AKIYOSHI YAMAMOTO1, KATSUMI NAKAMURA1,2, HIROKI MATOBA1, YUJI SHINTANI1, DAIJI UCHIYAMA1, SEIGO YOSHIDA1, and MITSUE MIYAZAKI3
1Radiolgy, Tobata Kyoritsu Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan, 2Nexus Image Lab, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 3Toshiba Medical Research Institute USA, Vernon Hills, IL, United States
Synopsis
A
non-gated single 20-sec breath-hold non-contrast-enhanced 3D-MRA technique
using bSSFP was developed and the feasibility of the proposed method for the
visualization of renal artery was compared using respiratory gated non-contrast-enhanced
time-SLIP 3D-MRA with several minutes of scan time. The single breath-hold
bSSFP-MRA technique was optimized in flip angle and the number of segmentations
to obtain excellent renal blood signal with maintaining about 20 sec breath-holding.
The proposed bSSFP-MRA technique gave equal to time-SLIP MRA in the
visualization of renal artery.INTRODUCTION
Three-dimensional balanced SSFP
(bSSFP) can provide high blood signal of arteries and veins by intrinsic T2/T1
effect; however, it would usually be difficult to depict a certain artery
selectively. Time-spatial
labeling inversion pulse (time-SLIP) is a non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography
(MRA) technique, which provides selectively good quality MRA images from the
aorta to the renal artery branches,1 and showed as a promising
technique for assessing the renal arterial stenosis.2,3 However, an insufficient respiratory gating
may degrade the image quality, and the depiction of inferior vena cava (IVC) would
interfere an interpretation of renal arteries.
The purpose of this study is to develop a
non-gated single breath-hold (about 20 sec) renal MRA using inflow bSSFP with a
simple technique of signal suppression of IVC, and to evaluate the diagnostic
ability of the proposed method compared with renal MRA using respiratory gated
time-SLIP.
MATERIALS and METHODS
Institutional review board approval and
informed consent were obtained. All MR examinations were performed using at a
1.5-T clinical imager (EXCELART VantageTM XGV PPP powered by Atlas,
Toshiba, Japan), equipped with using an Atlas SPEEDER body and an Atlas SPEEDER
spine coil. Thirteen healthy volunteers (11 male, 2 female, mean age: 27.6+/-6
y.o.) participated in this study.
TECHNIQUES
Figure 1 shows a typical example of slice
slab plan. The slice slab of head side was tilted backward not to include the
abdominal aorta above renal arteries in order to obtain higher signal of
inflowing arterial blood. On the other hand, the slice slab of foot side was placed
to include IVC as much as possible for the suppression of blood signal within
IVC.
Flip angle of bSSFP was optimized to 100 degree
(maximum due to SAR), which gave higher signal of blood over renal parenchyma. The
number of segmentation was optimized to 4, which gave high blood signal of
inflowing abdominal aortic artery and renal artery with reduced IVC blood
signal. Breath-hold MRA with 3D bSSFP was used with parameters as follows:
TR=4.3 msec, TE =2.2 msec, section thickness of 2 mm (with ZIP interpolation),
field of view=35 x 30 cm, matrix=256 x 208, parallel imaging factor=2.5,
segment=4, flip angle=100 deg, and a total
scan time of about 20 sec.
Respiratory-gated time-SLIP with 3D
bSSFP was used with parameters as follows: TR=5 msec, TE =2.5 msec, section
thickness of 2 mm (with ZIP interpolation), field of view=35 x 30 cm,
matrix=256 x 256, parallel imaging factor=2.5, segment=2, flip
angle=120 deg, and a total scan time of about 5 min.
CNR values of renal
artery obtained by non-gated bSSFP and respiratory-gated time-SLIP were
calculated with the CNR=(SIA–SIP)/SD formula (SIA: signal intensity of renal
artery; SIP: signal intensity of renal parenchyma; SD: standard deviation of
renal artery). The visualization of bilateral renal arteries and renal
hilar arteries of bSSFP using MIP image was compared with those of time-SLIP
using the 4-point scale as follows; grade 4, bSSFP is clearly superior to
time-SLIP; grade 3, bSSFP is slightly superior to time-SLIP; grade 2, bSSFP is
equal to time-SLIP; and grade 1, bSSFP is inferior to time-SLIP.
RESULTS
Figure 2 shows CNR
of bilateral renal arteries with bSSFP and time-SLIP. CNR of bSSFP was 2.8 almost equal to that of
time-SLIP-MRA in 2.9. Figure 3 shows the comparison of the visualization of
renal arteries and hilar arteries using these two methods. bSSFP showed almost equal
visualization to that of time-SLIP in left renal artery and bilateral hilar
arteries. However, the visualization right renal artery with bSSFP was superior
to that of time-SLIP, because of considerable signal suppression of IVC in
bSSFP. Figure 3 shows a typical case of MRA images of bSSFP and time-SLIP.
DISCUSSIONS
The reason of IVC
signal suppression in bSSFP is thought to be less IVC signal due to the slab
tilting, as well as a greater number of segmentations and large flip angle in
bSSFP parameters might decrease the signal of inflowing blood within IVC, which
would contribute the improved visualization of right renal artery. In two
cases, the image quality of distal hilar arteries in bSSFP was inferior because
of less inflow blood flow during short data acquisition time of four
segmentations. In one case the visualization of renal artery was inferior
because of the breath-hold failure, which indicates that further reduction of
the breath-hold acquisition time is required in clinical study.
CONCLUSION
The single 20-second breath-hold renal MRA with 3D
bSSFP provides good quality renal MRA with high SNR and sufficient suppression
of IVC blood signal. The technique is simple, easy to apply to the renal artery
examination in clinical practice.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Takahashi J, Tsuji Y, Hamada Y, et al.
Non-Contrast-Enhanced Renal MRA using time-spatial labeling pulse (t-SLIP) with
3D balanced SSFP. Proc. ISMRM 2007:179.
2. Parienty I, Rostoker G, Jouniaux F, et al. Renal artery
stenosis evaluation in chronic kidney disease patients: nonenhanced
time-spatial labeling inversion-pulse three-dimensional MR angiography with
regulated breathing versus DSA. Radiology. 2011;259(2):592-601.
3. Albert TSE, Akahane M, Parienty I, et al. An
international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and
contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal
artery contrast-free trial l. AJR. 2015;204(1):182-188.