Yuki Ohmoto-Sekine1, Junji Takahashi2, Takashi Yoshida2, Makiko Ishihara3, Hiroshi Tsuji1, Yasuji Arase1, and Mitsue Miyazaki4
1Health Management Center, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, 2Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, 3Imaging Cenetr, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, 4Toshiba Medical Resarch Institute, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
Noncontrast renal 3D MRA using time-spatial labeling
inversion pulse (Time-SLIP) with respiratory triggering (Time-SLIP renal MRA) is proven to be valuable for
non-invasive assessment of renal arteries. However, to our knowledge, there are no studies demonstrating the
reproducibility of Time-SLIP renal MRA. Thus, we examined the reproducibility of
Time-SLIP renal MRA and the result showed acceptable inter-scan agreement
between the original and repeated scans.Purpose
A noncontrast renal MRA is a
very useful and safe diagnostic tool for screening of renal artery stenosis and
for following up of renal transplantation. Because a substantial population of
these patients who require the examination is renal insufficiency was existed. Noncontrast
renal 3D MRA using time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (Time-SLIP) with
respiratory triggering (Time-SLIP renal MRA) was applied to visualize
dedicated renal arteries without contrast medium (1-3). To our knowledge, there
are no studies demonstrating the reproducibility of Time-SLIP renal MRA. Thus, the purpose of this study is to ascertain the
reproducibility of Time-SLIP renal MRA in
clinical setting on health checkup screenings.
Methods
All studies were performed using a commercial 1.5-T scanner
(Toshiba Medical Systems Corp., Tochigi, Japan) with parallel imaging ATLAS body coil. The coronal imaging parameters were:
TR/TE/FA=4.3ms/2.2ms/120°, spatial resolution=0.7×0.7×1.25mm
3 (after interpolation), respiratory
triggering, STIR with TI= 190 ms, parallel imaging
reduction factor=2.0, Time-SLIP tag slice thickness=240 mm, and 2
segmentations. Image quality was evaluated by using source and MIP images for
renal arteries.
A total of 36 cases of renal artery screening was performed twice
with a mean interval of 2.3 years; we compared the image quality, motion degradation and visible
number of branches of each renal artery.
The image was evaluated in image quality, motion degradation,
contrast ratio and countable number of each renal arterial branches by an
experienced observer using randomized image pairs. The image quality was rated
on a 4-point scale (0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, and 3 = excellent), and scores
2 and 3 were defined as an acceptable image quality. The motion degradation was also assessed on a 4-point
scale at renal arteries and branches: 1 indicates no visible motion degradation,
2 minimal motion degradation, 3 moderate motion degradation with blurring of
the vessel border but diagnostic, and 4 severe motion degradation and non-diagnostic.
Relative signal contrast ratio between artery (S
A) and background (S
B,
renal cortex and renal medulla) signals was measured
from the source images using CR
A-B = (S
A-S
B)/S
A.
Wilcoxon signed rank test was used on the image quality,
motion degradation and countable number of each renal arterial branches and
paired-t test was used contrast ratio. A
p
value of less than <0.05 was considered to indicate a significant
difference. Reproducibility of the contrast ratio was analyzed using Bland-Altman
analysis.
Results
All 36
cases were successfully scanned and reproduced in the original and the repeated
Time-SLIP renal MRA scans. Table 1 shows the visual
evaluation of source and MIP image of renal arteries. Excluding the image quality of right renal artery MIP (1st: 2.97±0.17,
2nd: 2.79±0.41, p =0.03) and visible number of branches of right
renal artery MIP (1st: 4.00±0.85, 2nd: 4.32±0.98,
p =0.04), the
image quality score, the score of motion degradation, and visible number of branches were
not significantly difference between the two scans. The image quality score of all was more than 2, the number of
difference score between the original and the repeated scans was 7
in right renal artery MIP. The contrast ratio between the original and the repeated scans was also
similar, and the inter-scan agreement for both arteries was reliable using
Bland -Altman analysis.
Discussion
The reproducibility of the original and the repeated scans was
consistent and some cases had a slight difference in image score, which may be caused
by respiratory condition difference
between the original and repeated scans as well as setting difference of the
Time-SLIP tag position by different operators. The reason for the difference of the image quality between the right
and left renal arteries in MIP was the anatomical location of right kidney,
which was located near the infra vena cava and it is easy to be affected by breathing condition. The reproducibility
of Time-SLIP renal MRA was acceptable over all.
Conclusion
Time-SLIP renal MRA
allows acceptable visualization of renal arteries in repeated scans and appears
to be highly reproducible for assessment of renal arteries.Thus, Time-SLIP renal MRA is a safe and useful technique
for renal artery screening.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1) Takahashi J, et al, ISMRM
16th, Toronto, p2903, 2008. 2) Parienty I, et al, Radiology 259:592-601, 2011. 3) Albert T, et al, AJR 205:204; 182-188.