Yutaka Natsuaki1, Robert Grimm2, Xiaoming Bi1, David Grodzki2, Peter Schmitt2, and Gerhard Laub1
1Siemens Healthcare, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
Previously, Ultra-Short TE sequences and their
subtraction-based non-contrast MR angiography (e.g. PETRA qMRA) have shown
promising results in intracranial applications, in particular with tortuous carotid
arteries that has been problematic for the current clinical gold standard 3D
Time Of Flight (TOF). As with any
subtraction based MRA techniques, PETRA qMRA is also sensitive to motion occurred in
subsequent acquisitions. The current
work demonstrates that the proposed 3D elastic cross-registration can solve this
limitation for the PETRA qMRA, and it takes to the next level in motion robustness
and in the highest attainable isotropic resolution. Purpose
For non-contrast intracranial MR angiography (MRA),
the Ultra-short TE (UTE) sequences (e.g. PETRA
1) and their
subtraction-based MRA techniques (e.g. PETRA qMRA
2-3) have shown
great promises of being a viable alternative to the current gold standard in 3D
Time-of-Flight (TOF)
4 with well-known flow dephasing issues. However, as with any subtraction based MRA
techniques, PETRA qMRA too is limited by how well two data sets from subsequent
measurements are aligned. The current
work demonstrates that the 3D elastic cross-registration can potentially solve
this limitation, and enables PETRA qMRA to reach new level in motion robustness
and in the highest attainable isotropic resolution.
Methods
With the PETRA
qMRA, two imaging volumes (i.e. labeled and control data) are acquired (Fig.1).
The labeled data set applies the
slice-selective saturation pulse at the upstream of the carotid artery,
effectively darkening the arterial inflow.
The subsequent control data features the same saturation pulse, only
prescribed outside of the imaging volume for retaining the MT effects while not
interfering with the imaging volume. Two data sets are then subtracted to
generate desired Arterial MRA with back ground tissue and venous flow
suppressed.
As with any
subtraction-based MRA techniques, the two subsequent measurement data need to be aligned. Otherwise, mis-registered data
subtraction generates undesired background residual artifacts and interferes
with the intended arteries. The
individual PETRA measurement, on the other hand, is robust to motion thanks to
the 3D radial acquisition. Combining
these two motion properties, we hypothesize that if the two PETRA data sets are
properly registered via post-processing, their subtraction will result in the optimal
angiography data. In addition, with such post-processing, the
longer scan time with improved resolution is now attainable. The current work utilizes 3D elastic
registration originally proposed by Chefd’Hotel et al 5-6. Since this post-processing has an overall smoothing
effect on the registered images, both labeled and control data are
cross-registered prior to the subtraction (Fig.2).
The sequence
prototype was implemented on 3T scanners (MAGNETOM Skyra and Prisma, Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The
technique was validated with healthy volunteers (n=5) under a local IRB approved protocol. PETRA qMRA data was acquired
with the following high resolution protocol: FOV 220mm3, 75000
radial spokes; isotropic 0.57mm3; flip angle = 6°; TR/TE 4.25/0.07msec; BW 1860
Hz/pixel; slice selective Saturation pulse applied once per 25 TRs; total scan
time 2 x 6:01min. The acquired DICOM
data were then post-processed offline on a standard laptop PC for the proposed
cross-registration (syngo via Frontier MR Elastic Registration Toolbox prototype,
Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The
resulting MRA data sets (without vs with elastic cross-registration) were
compared for overall image quality, delineation of vessel details, and
presence/absence of artifacts.
Results
All scans, reconstructions, and post-processing
were performed successfully. To our surprise, each 3D elastic registration of PETRA
isotropic data (384x384x384 matrix size) only took few seconds on a standard non-GPU
laptop PC. Fig.3 shows a representative
volunteer data acquired with the high resolution protocol. While smoothing effects from the post processing
were apparent in subtracted data, it did not smooth out the target arteries
including small distal branches. As expected, the 3D elastic registration has
shown clear improvements over the unregistered data in residual background
artifacts and noises (e.g., spurious arteries (red arrows),
residual brain tissue (green oval) and distal arteries interference (blue oval)).
Discussion
For an intracranial MRA with rigid brain, 3D elastic
registration is probably overkill.
However, it still provides the best possible registration with such high
efficiency, and as the image resolution gets higher, the data are more prone to the registration error. In the current work, we intentionally
increased the resolution (0.57mm
3) and the total scan time (12 min). Because
of this, the resulting data without registration appears far noisier
than the previously reported 0.86mm
3 isotropic resolution images
with a total scan time of 8 minutes. Nevertheless,
a total scan time of 12 min is too long to be clinically relevant and
further acceleration (e.g. radial SENSE
7) must be considered.
Conclusion
The 3D elastic cross-registration helps improving the
robustness of the PETRA qMRA, especially for high-resolution scan protocols. Further work includes clinical validation of
the method on intracranial MRA patients and technical developments in PETRA acquisition to be more efficient.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Grodzki DM, et al. MRM 67:510–518 (2012)
2. Grodzki DM, et al. Proc. MRA Club (2014)
3. Natsuaki Y, et al. Proc. ISMRM (2015)
4. Parker DL et al. MRM 17:434-451(1991)
5. Chefd’hotel C, et al. Proc. IEEE Biomed lma. (2002)
6. Chefd’hotel C, et al. Proc. ICCV (2001)
7. Pang J, et al. MRM 71:67-74 (2013)