Simon Reiss1, Axel Joachim Krafft1,2,3, Marius Menza1, Lisa Caroline Besch4, Timo Heidt4, Christoph Bode4, Constantin von zur Mühlen4, and Michael Bock1
1Dept. of Radiology - Medical Physics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 2German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Medical Center Freiburg, Heidelberg, Germany, 3German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 4Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center, Freiburg, Germany
Synopsis
The implantation of bioresorbable
Vascular Scaffolds (BVS) is a rapidly evolving technique in the treatment of
coronary artery disease. BVS consist of a polylactate-based backbone which is
completely dissolved after 2-3 years. Due to the organic material, coronary MRI
can be used as a non-invasive technique for post-interventional imaging of
arteries treated with BVS, which is not possible for metal stents. In this
study, we evaluated the use of 3T MRI in assessing luminal patency after
implantation of the BVS, as well as flow measurements for myocardial blood flow quantification as a possible
indicator of post-interventional angina.Introduction
The implantation of bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS) is a rapidly
evolving technique in the treatment of coronary artery disease. BVS consist of
a polylactate-based backbone which is completely dissolved after 2-3 years. Potential
advantages over bare metal stents in the mid- or long term include restoration
of the vessel function, reduction in angina, and avoiding very late stent
thrombosis as the vessel is free of any metal caging after resorption of the
BVS.
Furthermore,
due to the organic backbone, coronary MRI can be used as a non-invasive
technique for post-interventional imaging of arteries treated with BVS, which
is not possible for metal stents [1]. Artifact-free imaging has been shown in a
small number of cases at 1.5T [2,3]. In this study, we further evaluated the
use of 3T MRI in assessing patency of coronary arteries treated with BVS, as
well as flow measurements for myocardial blood flow quantification as a possible indicator
of post-interventional angina.
Methods
Coronary MR-imaging was performed in 10 patients at
a 3T system (Siemens Prisma) within two days post intervention. The patients
included in this study received one or more BVS in proximal segments of the
left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX) or right coronary artery
(RCA). The complete MR protocol was acquired using ECG triggering. The measurements
started with localization of the scaffolded artery using a low-resolution 3D
navigator-gated bSSFP sequence with fat-saturation covering the whole heart.
The gating acceptance window was set to the end-expiratory phase for all measurements.
For the assessment of
coronary patency a 3D bright-blood navigator-gated FLASH sequence with 1.08 mm
isotropic resolution, fat saturation and T2 preparation (TE/TR: 1.9/3.1 ms,
FoV: 28x277x295 mm³, TET2prep: 40 ms, R = 2) was acquired along the
course of the vessel. This was followed by a 3D navigator-gated T2-weighted
variable flip angle TSE sequence with 1.15 mm isotropic resolution,
dual-inversion recovery black-blood preparation and elliptical k-space coverage
(TEeff: 93 ms, TR: 2*(average duration of cardiac cycle), FoV:
16x234x294 mm³).
In a subgroup of 6
patients, time-resolved blood flow velocity quantification was done via
phase-contrast MRI, using a cross-sectional 2D single slice with through-plane
velocity-encoding positioned proximal to the scaffolded vessel area. Images
were acquired with spiral sampling, prospective ECG-triggering and respiratory navigator-gating
as well as a 1-2-1 binomial water selective RF excitation pulse for fat signal
suppression (TE/TR: 4.8/15.2 ms, 16 interleaves, SL: 8 mm, FoV: 200x200 mm³, VENC:
35 cm/s). As an additional functional parameter, the ejection fraction was
measured with a multi-slice cine-bSSFP sequence in short-axis view.
Results
Reformatted 3D bright-blood images show prominent and wide open luminal
areas in all patients (cf. fig. 1). Luminal characteristics corresponded well to
digital subtraction angiography images obtained during the coronary intervention.
As previously shown at 1.5T, no susceptibility or RF-shielding artifacts arising
from the BVS are seen in both gradient-echo and spin-echo images. 3D TSE
imaging was successful in only 5 patients. This could be explained by high and
unstable heart rates seen in some patients which can lead to severe image
artifacts in TSE acquisitions due to their high susceptibility to motion.
Average acquisition durations of the 3D sequences were: 8:47 ± 3:00 min (FLASH)
and 6:56 ± 3:21 min (TSE).
Figure 2 shows an
example of the coronary flow measurements in a patient treated with a BVS in
the RCA as well as a patient treated with a BVS in the LAD. Flow velocities are
averaged over the cross-section of the artery and plotted against the time
after the R-wave. In general, the measured flow velocity curves agree with
previously published coronary flow MRI [4] showing higher peak velocities in
the LAD compared to the RCA that occur also later in the cardiac cycle,
indicating that blood flow through the left coronary artery occurs mainly
during diastole.
Conclusion
In this study, we show that artifact-free 3T coronary
MRI for the judgement of luminal patency of scaffolded coronary arteries is feasible
and safe in patients treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
Furthermore, measurement of blood flow and blood flow velocity could be performed
in segments proximal to BVS implantation. In a follow-up, patients will be
examined with the same MR protocol, so that potential changes in patency and
blood flow pattern of the treated artery as well as the ejection fraction could
be assessed. This might help to explain clinical findings such as
post-interventional reduction of angina.
Acknowledgements
Grant support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(DFG) under grant number BO 3025/2-2 is gratefully acknowledged.References
[1] Klemm T, et al. JMRI 2000;
12:606-15
[2] Baron-Rochette G, et
al. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16:229
[3] Reiss S, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8:e002388
[4]
Keegan J, et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015; 17:85