Tyler Joseph Spear1, Tori Stromp1, Steve Leung2, and Moriel Vandsburger1
1Saha Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States, 2Gill Heart Imaging Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
Synopsis
This project uses cardiac magnetic resonance to compare cine
balance steady state free precession signals between 2D and 3D acquisitions in
order to better understand how through-plane motion of tissues impacts the change
in signal through the cardiac cycle. As
quantitative techniques become more prevalent and refined, it is imperative to
be able understand the evolution of these signals to eliminate results due to
physical motion of the heart that would skew the results of otherwise diagnostic
tests.Purpose
Due to the
excellent contrast between blood and tissue, bSSFP is the current clinical
standard for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Recently,
several studies
1,2 have noted that changes in tissue structure such
as edema and fibrosis can change steady state characteristics of myocardial
signal intensity. It has also been shown
that bSSFP is capable of quantifying myocardian edema
3, though this
has only been examined using 2D acquisitions.
However, through-plane motion during the
cardiac cycle can influence the signal evolution in
steady state approaches. In
this study, we examined the impact of through-plane motion on preservation of
steady state magnetization in standard 2D balanced steady state free precession
(bSSFP) compared to 3D volume (slab) cine bSSFP.
Methods
In this
study, nine healthy adult males between 20-30 years of age completed CMR on a
1.5T Seimens Aera scanner (Erlangen, Germany).
Prospectively gated cine bSSFP images were acquired with excitation flip
angle of 50° in five slabs, each consisting of six slices, and acquired from
left ventricular base to apex. [TR/TE=
54.24/1.46 ms, FOV= 260x260 mm2, slice thickness 8mm, Matrix=
256x256, phases set to fill the cardiac interval]. 2D images were taken at the same location as
the center two images in each slab, while maintaining all parameters except
TR/TE= 35.64/1.36 ms. The percent change
from the initial signal ΔS was calculated as ΔS = S/S
0, where S
0
is the average signal intensity at the first cardiac phase in each slice. This ratio was plotted against position in the cardiac cycle for each slice
(see fig 2). The regions of interest
were defined using a custom program used for feature tracking, and were
manually adjusted for precision as described by Jing
4. A MATLAB
(Mathworks, Nattick, MA) script was used
to analyze the signal intensity in these contoured images and
calculate changes in the average signal.
Results
The
averaged peak systolic ΔS was significantly higher in 2D bSSFP compared to the
corresponding peak value in an identical slice acquired at the center of a 3D
bSSFP slab. Data analyzed at
mid-ventricular locations (center slices of the center slab) shows the maximum
change in signal from S
0 in 2D is 40 ±21% and 16 ±7% (p<0.01) for
3D. The percent of phases in which the
signal was within 10% of the S0 value is 48 ±11%
for 2D and 83 ±16% (p<0.001) for 3D images at
the same location (see fig 3). The peak
ΔS of outer slice pairs 2,5 and 1,6 are greater than the center slices, though
less than the 2D images.
Discussion
Previously,
studies had compared 2D and 3D imaging, but only to demonstrate agreement in
calculated cardiac function
5 and diagnostic capabilities
6. The authors concluded that the loss in
spatial resolution did not significantly impact diagnoses, and that they had
the clinical benefit of taking less take time and fewer breath holds to
complete. However, with an emerging
understanding of how changes in tissue structure alter steady state
magnetization in bSSFP acquisitions, it is important to understand the
mechanisms altering steady state conditions.
Our results indicate that while steady state magnetization is only
transiently maintained in 2D cine bSSFP, the final 30% of the cardiac cycle
shows a return to initial magnetization values, and becomes similar to 3D
acquisitions. In addition to having a
much lower maximum change in signal, the variability of 3D images is much lower
than those of 2D. Further analysis of 3D
bSSFP revealed a position dependent steady state behavior, with steady state
maintained only at the center of the 3D slab.
The next step for this study is to look at motion and function through the
cardiac cycle. 4-chamber images will be
analyzed in the same custom program to determine strain and strain rate in the
same time axis as signal intensity.
Since the ΔS curves seem to reach local maxima around systole and the
post-systolic kick, this change in signal could be indicative of certain
cardiac functions.
Conclusion
A more
consistent signal can be measured in bSSFP by looking at the center images of a
volumetric excitation as opposed to the standard 2D bSSFP. For studies that extract data via
quantification of signal throughout the cardiac cycle, it is necessary to
understand how the signal changes due to through-plane motion.
Acknowledgements
This work is funded by NHLBI (NIH 1R01HL28592-01). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.References
1.
Stromp T, Leung S, Andres K, et al. JCMR. 2015.
2.
Kumar A, Beohar N, Arumana J, et al. JACC 2011
3.
Giri S, Chung YC, Merchant A, et al. JCMR 2009
4.
Jing L, Haggerty C, Suever J, et al. European
Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging 2014
5.
Mascarenhas N, Muthupillai R, Cheong B, et al.
AJR 2006
6.
Peters D, Ennis D, Rohatgi P et al. JMRI 2004