Shivaprasad Ashok Chikop1, Amaresha Shridhar Konar1, Nithin Vajuvalli1, Darshan Shivaram Keelara1, Ashwini Kumnoor1, Sairamesh raghuraman2, Ramesh Venkateshan2, and sairam Geethanath1
1Medical Imaging Research Centre, Dayananda Sagar Institutions, Bangalore, India, 2Wipro GE Healthcare, Bangalore, India
Synopsis
The goal of the work was to build a low cost
cardiac phantom that mimics cardiac motion and measure thermometric profile
based on applied B1+ fields during MR imaging. The cardiac motion inside the phantom was
simulated using the mechanical gear setup. To obtain the thermometric profile of the
cardiac phantom 12 probes were inserted into the phantom with required thermal insulation. The
phantom also provides an opportunity to correlate local SAR findings with
temperature measurements in the heart phantom. Purpose
The goal of the work was to build a low cost
cardiac phantom that mimics cardiac motion and measure thermometric profile
based on applied B
1+ fields during MR imaging. The phantom
could be used to validate novel acquisition and reconstruction strategies
specifically focusing on cardiac motion and Specific Absorption Rate (SAR).
Methods
The cardiac phantom consists of two square boxes
made out of acrylic material, sizes of which were 200´200´200mm3
and 350´350´350mm3. The smaller box housed the
heart that was prepared using Poly Vinyl Alcohol (PVA). The larger box housed
the mechanical gear system that produces the piston motion. 10% of PVA solution
was prepared as in ref. [1] and cardiac mold was prepared as per the
specification based on American Society of Echocardiography using polymer clay.
The cardiac motion inside the phantom was simulated using the mechanical gear
setup. The gear setup consisted of the one oblique shaped oval and small disc,
the rotational motion between the two was converted to horizontal piston motion.
The piston was connected to pumping system to pump in Copper Sulphate (CuSO4)
solution that mimic the blood contrast. The cardiac phantom setup is as shown
in the figure 1.
In-vivo data was
acquired on a 1.5T scanner using cardiac cine protocol in short axis and four
chamber views with the following acquisition parameters: TR/TE=66.8/1.42ms,
FA=80, number of measurements 10. Small acrylic box housed PVA cardiac phantom
was placed in the head coil and the mechanical setup housed in large acrylic
box was placed on the patient table for pumping the CuSO4 solution.
A thread was connected to the gear setup inside the large box, the thread was
pulled to get the piston motion. The piston would push the pumping system to
pump in the CuSO4 solution. PVA phantom had two valves connected to
pipes, one was for pumping-in CuSO4 solution and other one was kept
open to avoid air bubbles in the cardiac chamber during pump-in.
Thermometry:
The cardiac phantom was
positioned in the iso-center, supported with foam pads on the sides and paper
tapes. Tap water was filled in the heart phantom. To obtain the thermometric profile
of the cardiac phantom 12 probes were inserted into the phantom as shown in
figure 3(d,e), with required thermal insulation. One probe was placed inside
the bore and one probe inside the head coil to serve as controls. The above
thermometry experiments were carried out at 3T GE Signa scanner. The
scan protocol included a gradient echo sequence was part of a B1+
stress test for a single channel transmit head coil which produced a B1max
of 3.2µT. This experiment was repeated twice with RF being turned on and off
for half hour each.
Results
Four
chamber view and oblique short axis image of the phantom can be seen as shown
in Figure 2 and show cardiac motion. This depicts change in the cardiac wall (myocardium)
in the four chamber view and change in the left and right ventricle size in the
oblique short axis view at 10 different time points. Vertical dotted lines are
plotted to separate the left and right chamber and horizontal dotted line to
show the changes in the size of left and right ventricle during CuSO4
pump
in. Figure 3(a) shows the probe poked into the cardiac phantom prepared for
thermometric measurement. Figure 3(b)
shows the coil sensitivity of the image. Cardiac phantom was placed vertically
in the head coil and bottom part of the phantom was placed close to the coil
elements which resulted in hyperintensity in the bottom part of the cardiac
phantom image. Figure 3(c) shows the short axis view of the cardiac phantom. Temperature
increased with the application of RF and reduced when it was turned off. This
can be observed in Figure 4.
Discussion and Conclusion
We have achieved 40 to 50 beats per minute and currently
working on matching the normal human heart beat of approximately 70. The
phantom provides for a detailed study of thermometry with and without the effect
of perfusion. The phantom also provides
an opportunity to correlate local SAR findings with temperature measurements in
the heart phantom. This is critical as accelerated cardiac MRI is mostly
restricted by SAR constraints.
Acknowledgements
1.This work was supported by Vision Group on Science and Technology (VGST), Govt. of Karnataka and Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India under the program Technology Systems Development (TSD) for the project “Novel acquisition and reconstruction strategies to accelerate magnetic resonance imaging using compressed sensing”, No: DST/TSG/NTS/2013/100-G.
References
1. Tavakoli
et al “A Multimodal (MRI/Ultrasound) Cardiac Phantom for Imaging Experiments”
Medical Imaging 2013: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and
Functional Imaging, SPIE 2013