Leah C Henze Bancroft1, Roberta M Strigel1,2,3, Gavin Hamilton4, Scott B Reeder1,2,5,6,7, and Diego Hernando2
1Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 2Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 3University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 4Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States, 5Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 6Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 7Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
Synopsis
The highly heterogeneous distribution of fat and
fibroglandular tissue in the breast makes obtaining accurate measures of T1 and
T2 relaxation times difficult. Here, a
rapid, multi echo, multi TR spectroscopy sequence is used to measure the T1 and
T2 relaxation times of fat and fibroglandular tissue in the breast at 3T. Partial voluming effects are accounted for
through accurate measurement of the proton density fat fraction.Purpose
As clinical breast MR increasingly moves from 1.5T to 3T, accurate
knowledge of T1 and T2 relaxation times of breast tissue is important for accurate
tissue characterization and MR sequence parameter optimization for both
clinical and research applications. Sources
reporting T1 and T2 relaxation times at 3T are limited
1. In addition, as breast tissue consists of a
highly heterogeneous distribution of fat and fibroglandular tissue, partial
volume effects are common and make it difficult to obtain independent
relaxation rates for the two tissues. In
this work, a previously developed, rapid, stimulated echo acquisition mode
(STEAM)-based MR spectroscopy (MRS) technique
2 is applied to measure T1 and
T2 relaxation times in breast fat and fibroglandular tissue in normal
volunteers.
Methods
Six normal volunteers were recruited for this HIPAA compliant,
IRB approved study. Volunteers underwent
3T breast MRI (Discovery 750w, GE Healthcare, Waukesha WI) using an 8-channel phased
array breast coil (GE Healthcare, Waukesha WI).
The rapid multi-TR, multi-TE STEAM-MRS
sequence developed by Hamilton et al.2 provides simultaneous,
accurate estimation of proton-density fat-fraction (PDFF), and T1 and T2
relaxation times of water and fat tissue within the acquisition voxel. MRS voxels were placed in each volunteer,
one in primarily fatty tissue and the other in primarily fibroglandular tissue as
shown in Figure
1. Voxel
sizes were adjusted manually for each volunteer to keep the voxel primarily in
one tissue type and ranged from approximately 10 x 10 x 10 mm to 20 x 20 x 20 mm.
Thirty-two spectra with varying TRs (150-2000ms) and varying TEs (10ms-110ms) as
described in Hamilton et al. were
acquired in a 21 second acquisition for each voxel. Spectroscopic
quantification was performed offline using an automated algorithm for joint
quantification of all acquired spectra for a given voxel, including measurement
of the T1 and T2 of fibroglandular tissue and fat, as well as voxel PDFF, based
on the method described in Hernando et
al.3
Results
The measured T1 and T2 relaxation times are given in Table
1. Fibroglandular results from one
volunteer were excluded as the breast was primarily fatty and the voxel
contained less than 15% fibroglandular tissue, based on the estimated PDFF
value.
Discussion
A previous study1 by Rakow-Penner et al based
on inversion recovery imaging and spin echo imaging (with and without fat-water
separation) had reported breast T1 and T2 values: T1fibroglandular= 1445±93ms,
T2fibroglandular= 54±9ms, T1fat= 367±8ms, and T2fat=
53±2ms. These previous measurements are discrepant with our measurements. Specifically,
Rakow-Penner et al reported that T2fat ≈ T2fibroglandular
whereas we observed T2fat >
T2fibroglandular. The source of this discrepancy may be related to
technical differences in the relaxometry methods such as J-coupling effects or
fat-water separation errors due to the lack of multi-peak spectral modeling of
fat4, but currently remains
unclear.
All voxels placed in the breast demonstrated the presence of
both fat and water species contributing to the overall signal despite efforts
to place voxels in areas appearing to consist of a single tissue type. This highlights the fact that fat and
fibroglandular tissue are highly intermingled in the breast, making partial
volume effects nearly impossible to avoid.
Rakow-Penner et al.1
utilized IDEAL with a single peak model of fat to provide fat-water separation,
which can lead to inaccurate water-fat separation4 and ultimately the calculated
T1 and T2 values.
Spectroscopy is generally considered to be the most accurate
noninvasive method to quantify the PDFF.
The spectroscopic STEAM sequence used here allows for accurate
separation of the fat and water components, enabling truly independent
determination of T1 and T2 values of fat and fibroglandular tissue even in the
presence of partial volume effects.
STEAM also better mitigates the effects of J-coupling than PRESS
spectroscopy methods5, allowing for more accurate
measurement of T2 relaxation time. Further, the short, ~20 second scan time of
the sequence allows it to easily be incorporated into clinical or research exams.
Conclusion
In this work, we used a rapid spectroscopic STEAM sequence for
measurement of T1 and T2 of both fat and fibroglandular breast tissue at 3T. The measurements provided by this approach
may enable improved tissue characterization and protocol optimization for a
variety of breast imaging applications.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support from
the NIH (UL1TR00427, R01 DK083380, R01 DK088925, R01 DK100651,
K24 DK102595, T32CA009206), the Radiological Society of North
America, and GE Healthcare.References
1. Rakow-Penner
R, Daniel B, Yu H, Sawyer-Glover A, Glover GH. Relaxation times of breast
tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL. J Magn Reson Imaging
2006;23(1):87-91.
2.Hamilton G, Middleton MS, Hooker JC,
Haufe WM, Forbang NI, Allison MA, Loomba R, Sirlin CB. In vivo breath-hold H
MRS simultaneous estimation of liver proton density fat fraction, and T and T
of water and fat, with a multi-TR, multi-TE sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging
2015.
3.Hernando D, Artz NS, Hamilton G,
Roldan A, Reeder SB. Fully automated processing of multi-echo spectroscopy data
for liver fat quantification. Proceedings of the 22nd ISMRM Scientific Meeting
2014. Milan, Italy 2014.
4.Kijowski R, Woods M, Lee K, Takimi
K, Yu H, Shimakawa A, Brittain J, Reeder S. Improved fat suppression using
multipeak reconstruction for IDEAL chemical shift fat-water separation:
application with fast spin echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging
2009;29(2):436-42.
5.Hamilton G, Middleton MS, Bydder M,
Yokoo T, Schwimmer JB, Kono Y, Patton HM, Lavine JE, Sirlin CB. Effect of PRESS
and STEAM sequences on magnetic resonance spectroscopic liver fat
quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30(1):145-52.