Yin Xi1, Qing Yuan1, Yue Zhang1, Ananth Madhuranthakam1,2, Jeffrey Cadeddu3, Vitaly Margulis3, James Brugarolas4,5, Payal Kapur3,6, and Ivan Pedrosa1,2
1Radiology, UTSouthwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 2Advanced Imaging Research Center, UTSouthwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 3Urology, UTSouthwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 4Internal Medicine, UTSouthwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 5Developmental Biology, UTSouthwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 6Pathology, UTSouthwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Synopsis
We propose a method that provides a simplified
visual representation of tumor vascular heterogeneity in clear cell renal cell
carcinoma (ccRCC) based on the combination of multiple parametric maps from quantitative
dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI analysis. Using this approach we observed an
association between the tumor grade and vascular heterogeneity, especially in
medium size tumors. A decision tree model was developed to predict high grade
and low grade histology in solid ccRCCs, which may help in management decisions
by providing additional information about the tumor biology beyond tumor size.INTRODUCTION
Grading of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can help in
the decision between surgery and active surveillance, and is an important
determinant of disease prognosis.[1] Current methods for
pre-surgical tumor grading rely on percutaneous biopsies, which are invasive
and prone to sampling errors in heterogeneous tumors. A magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI)-based non-invasive method for grading would be attractive because
it explores tumor heterogeneity in the whole tumor. Clear cell RCC (ccRCC), the
most common renal malignancy, is well suited to approaches that assess tumor
vascularity due to its known dependency on angiogenesis. A comprehensive
quantitative analysis of tumor vascularity can be achieved using dynamic
contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI with high temporal resolution and subsequent
analysis of these imaging datasets using pharmacokinetic models such as the one
proposed by Tofts et al. (1). While some studies have analyzed the ability of
DCE-derived parametric maps for grading RCC[2], to our knowledge the
value of combining the information provided by these maps into a single,
composite representation of tumor vascular heterogeneity has not been reported.
This study has two purposes. First, we employ a statistical clustering method
to partition each tumor into different areas associated with their level of
enhancement on DCE MRI. Second, we use a decision tree model to predict low and
high grade histology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients and MRI Protocol: This was a prospective, IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study. After
signing an informed consent, 42 patients scheduled for surgical resection of a
known solid renal mass later proven to represent a ccRCC underwent 3T MRI with
a phased array Torso coil (Achieva or Ingenia, Philips Medical System,
Cleveland, OH). DCE MRI was performed using a coronal 3D spoiled gradient echo acquisition with a temporal
resolution of 5 sec. To minimize respiratory motion, three consecutive dynamic
phases were obtained within each 15-sec breath-hold. A 15-sec period of
free-breathing was allowed between consecutive acquisition periods. Three
baseline dynamic phases were acquired, followed by a bolus of 0.1 mmol/kg of
gadobutrol (Gadavist; Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Wayne, NJ) using a
power injector at a rate of 2 cc/sec followed by a 20 cc saline flush at 2
cc/sec. Image Analysis: DCE images were analyzed using commercial
software VersaVue Enterprise (iCAD Inc., Nashua, NH). Pixel-by-pixel fitting
with Tofts model was performed after motion correction to generate quantitative
maps of Ktrans and Kep. The initial area under
the concentration curve (iAUC) was also calculated. All
DCE-derived maps were then analyzed with a DICOM viewer (OsiriX). Regions of
interest (ROI) of entire tumor were drawn on the DCE-derived maps Ktrans, Kep, and iAUC. Histopathology: The histopathological analysis
of the tumor after surgical resection served as the gold-standard. All tumors
were classified as: (a) low-grade (LG)
ccRCC for Fuhrman grades 1 and 2; (b) high-grade
(HG) ccRCC for Fuhrman grades 3 and 4. Statistics: First, pixel maps for all tumors were obtained. The length of the
tumor (cm) was calculated based on the tumor area assuming a spherical shape. Based
on the DCE values, fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering method was used to cluster
all pixels into three categories, namely low-active area (LAA), median-active
area (MAA) and high-active area (HAA). The percentages of the areas within the
tumor were also computed. Next, these percentages together with the length of
the tumor were considered as predictors for a decision tree model. In order to
reduce the impact of overfitting, leave-one-out cross validation was
implemented while calculating accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive
predictive value and negative predictive value.
RESULTS
Seventeen
high grade and 25 low grade ccRCCs were included in this study. Mean tumor size
was 20.4 cm2 ± 17.9 cm2 which corresponds to a mean largest diameter of 3.3 cm
± 1.4 cm. DCE maps from all patients were successfully obtained. FCM method was
able to distinguish different tumor areas according to their DCE enhancement.
High grade histology was associated with larger %HAA in medium size tumors
(n=21, p = 0.023, Figure 1). Images from two representatives tumors are shown
in Figure 2. An optimal decision tree model was constructed and is plotted in
Figure 3. After adjusting by cross validation, the optimal tree reached
an accuracy of 74%, with 88% sensitivity, 64% specificity, 63% PPV, and 89% NPV for the diagnosis of high grade ccRCC.
CONCLUSION
The FCM offers an
opportunity to summarize multiple DCE-derived pharmacokinetic maps and identify
unique tumor regions with different enhancement characteristics. Using this
approach we were able to construct a decision tree model using criteria beyond
size to predict tumor grade, especially in medium length tumors.
Acknowledgements
Supported by Grant NIH/NCI 1R01CA154475References
1.
P. S. Tofts, et al., JMRI 10-3: 223–232,
1999.
2.
Sun, et al.
Radiology 250, 3, 2009.