Peng Sun1, Kim J. Griffin1, Hung-Wen Kao2,3, Chien-Yuan Eddy Lin4,5, Ching-Po Lin3,6, and Sheng-Kwei Song1
1Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, 3Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, 4GE Healthcare, Taipei, Taiwan, 5GE Healthcare MR Research China, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 6Institute of Neuroscience, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
Synopsis
Patients with brain tumors usually exhibit heterogeneous tissue features. Our results suggest DBSI-derived
indices can quantify each individual feature. In addition, DBSI-derived
tractography can visualized white matter tracts through confounding tumor and
peritumoral edema.Backgrounds
Because
of the complexity
of tissue features associated with brain tumors, such as varying
grades of active tumor, peritumoral edema, and tissue necrosis, characterizing
tumors and presurgical planning is challenging with T1-weighted and T2-weighted
MR images. Diffusion-MRI derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been
used to reflect tumor cellularity but significantly confounded by surrounding
edema or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Surgical resection is the mainstay of
glioma treatment but the effectiveness of Diffusion tensor
imaging (DTI) tractography was significantly hampered by the
complex pathologies in pre-surgical planning. The separation of pathologies and
fibers can help address above issues. We have recently developed a new
diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) by modeling diffusion-weighted MR
signals as a linear combination of multiple discrete anisotropic (representing
multiple crossing fiber tracts) and a spectrum of isotropic (representing
cellularity, edema, and necrosis) diffusion tensors
1–4. The
purpose of this work is to evaluate the capabilities of assessing complex tumor
pathologies and the potentials of DBSI to improve tracking for tumor with
confounding peritumoral edema.
Methods
Patients with brain tumors were diagnosed and imaged at National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan. Diffusion-weighted
images (DWIs) were collected with a multi–b-value 99 direction diffusion scheme
at 3T (DISCOVERY MR750; GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS) with following parameters: TR = 6 s,
TE = 88 ms, maximal b-value = 2000 s/mm
2, in-plane resolution = 1×1
mm
2, slice thickness = 2.5 mm, FOV (field of view) = 256 × 256 mm
2,
one average and total acquisition time around 10 minutes. Both DTI and DBSI
were computed using in-house software developed by Matlab. DTI and DBSI
tractography were performed by DSI-Studio. DTI tracking was done using whole brain seeding with
FA threshold 0.1, angular threshold as 60 degree, and step size as 0.5mm.
DBSI tracking was also done using whole brain seeding with fiber fraction
threshold as 0.1, angular threshold as 60 degree and step size as 0.5mm. Tumor
and edema volumes were manually outlined on T2W and FLAIR were used to visually
enhance tracking difference between two methods.
Results
Complex tissue structures of patient with meningioma were characterized using DBSI (Fig. 1). Complex
tissue structures associated with the presence metastatic
lung adenocarcinoma and the associated significant brain edema were
characterized using DBSI (Fig. 2). The white matter tracts invisible to DTI
tractography clearly seen using DBSI with the extent of edema quantified and
labeled on individual tracts (Fig. 3).
Conclusions
Our
results suggest DBSI derived isotropic fractions can quantitatively assess tumor
cellularity, edema and necrosis. By separating fibers from confounding
pathologies, DBSI was able to detect white matter tracts through peritumoral edema
where DTI tractography failed. The quantitative measurements of heterogeneous tumor
pathologies and enhanced tracking capability can serve as useful tools to
assist tumor treatment and pre-surgery planning.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Wang,
Y. et al. Brain, 138, 1223 (2015); 2. Wang, X. et al. NMR Biomed, 3219 (2014); 3. Chiang, C. W. et al. Neuroimage 101,
310 (2014); 4. Wang, Y. et al. Brain, 134, 3590 (2011).