AnithaPriya Krishnan1, Carrie R. McDonald1, Nikdokht Farid2, Anders M. Dale1,3, and Nathan S. White1,3
1MMIL, Radiology, University of San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States, 2Division of Neuroradiology, University of San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States, 3Center for Translational Imaging and Precision Medicine, University of San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
Synopsis
Contrast
enhancing (CE) volumes are unreliable in the pseudo-progression
window post radiotherapy and ADC based estimate of tumor cellularity
is significantly affected by edema. Here, we provide preliminary
evidence that Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) based tumor
cellularity performs better than ADC, supplements structural volumes
and is significantly predictive of overall survival (OS). The study
also highlights the need for higher b values as the association of
ADC (in CE) with outcomes was observed only when high b values were
used for ADC estimation and with b=1500s/mm2, ADC in edema
ROI was not independent of edema volume (r=0.7)Purpose
Apparent
diffusion coefficient (ADC),
derived from diffusion imaging is considered a surrogate for tumor
cellularity and is routinely used in combination with tumor
volumetrics for assessing early treatment response in patients with
glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). However, ADC is heavily influenced by
treatment-related edema, especially in the context of radiotherapy
(RT). The objective of this study was to test the predictive value of
Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) based tumor cellularity in
relation to clinical outcomes and to assess if it provides
information complementary to conventional imaging. Our hypothesis is
that RSI (due to its multi-b-shell acquisition and ability to
decouple tumor cellularity from edema) provides a reliable estimate
of tumor cellularity independent of volume changes in patients with
GBM.
Materials
and methods
We
analyzed the diffusion and structural images of twenty nine patients
with newly diagnosed GBM treated with external beam RT
(average dose of 60Gy in 30 fractions) and standard chemo and/or
tumor vaccines and receptor inhibitors. The baseline scans were
obtained post-surgery (16-STR, 13-GTR) and prior to chemo-radiation
(median 10 days pre-RT) and post scans were acquired within 50 days
post end of RT. Only imaging obtained prior to start of
anti-angiogenic therapy was included. Progression free survival (PFS
based on imaging and/or clinical deterioration) and overall survival
(OS) were defined w.r.to baseline. All scans were acquired and
corrected for geometric distortions and motion as described
previously
1.
Briefly, for RSI, a single-shot pulsed-field gradient spin-echo EPI
sequence was used (TE/TR = 96 ms/17 seconds; FOV = 24 cm) with 4
b-values (b
= 0, 500, 1500, and 4000 s/mm
2),
and 6, 6, and 15 unique diffusion directions for each nonzero
b-value, respectively. We used an RSI model with: a spherically
restricted component for tumor cells, a cylindrically restricted
component for the neurite fraction, a cylindrically hindered
component for extracellular space and a free water component for
CSF-filled compartments. The RSI model was fit to the unnormalized
diffusion signal using least-squares estimation with Tikhonov
regularization. Cellularity
2
values were computed by combining the parameter estimates from the
isotropic restricted component and the isotropic component of the
neurite fraction. ADC values were calculated from a tensor fit to the
full dataset. Contrast enhancing (CE
vol)
and FLAIR hyper-intensity (FLAIR
vol)
volume were defined semi-automatically in co-registered T1 and FLAIR
images at various time-points excluding necrotic core, blood products
and resection cavity.
The
ADC histogram in the CE and FLAIR
volumes were characterized using the 10th
and 50th
percentiles
3
and
RSI-cell using the 90th
and 80th
percentiles as ADC is inversely
3
and RSI-cell is directly
2
related to tumor cellularity. Cox Proportional Hazards (CoxPH) were
employed to describe PFS and OS on basis of clinical metrics (age,
gender and extent of resection) combined with diffusion metrics and
structural volumes. Significant diffusion metrics were co-varied with
the corresponding structural volumes to assess if they provided any
additional value. Due to the exploratory nature,
no formal adjustment of type I error was performed (R3.2.2).
Results
Median
OS was 617 days (8 censored) and median PFS was 313 days (3
censored). Of the baseline clinical factors, only extent of resection
was significantly associated with OS. Serial RSI cellularity and ADC
maps of two patients with comparable structural volumes at baseline
are shown in Figures 1 and 2. One patient (Patient1) progressed and
died early (PFS-216 and OS-275 days) compared to the other (Patient2)
who is still alive (PFS-458, OS – 508 days). CEvol
and FLAIRvol
increased
for both patients with Patient2 showing pseudo-progression. RSI
cellularity was higher in Patient1 than Patient 2 at both baseline
(RSI-FLAIR80%)
and post-RT (RSI-CE90%).
Despite the ADC-CE10%
being
larger in Patient1 than Patient 2, it is harder to track changes in
the images longitudinally.
The
summary of multivariate CoxPH analysis are summarized in table 1. For
OS, CEvol
and RSI-FLAIR80%
were the strongest predictors at baseline and FLAIRvol
and RSI-CE90%
were
the strongest predictors post-RT, with an increase in the metrics
being associated with worse survival. ADC-CE10%
and ADC-FLAIR10% were
predictive of PFS only post-RT. Correlation analysis revealed that
RSI-FLAIR80%,
RSI-CE90%
and ADC-CE10%
were independent of the structural volumes (r<0.3 for RSI and
r<0.45 for ADC). For ADC, this independence held true only when
high b values were used for its estimation compared to b=1500s/mm2
(r~0.7).
Conclusions
RSI
provides a better estimate of tumor cellularity, which may translate
to a more reliable measure of treatment response relative to ADC.
Specifically, it may provide a robust estimate of response to RT
compared to conventional imaging, notably in patients who underwent
STRs.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by NSF's EAGER grant: Restriction Spectrum Imaging for Evaluating Glioma Treatment Response (PI: Nathan S. White. Award 1430082)References
1.
White NS et. al.
Improved conspicuity and delineation of primary and metastatic
brain tumors using “restriction spectrum imaging”: Quantitative
comparison with high b-value DWI
and ADC. Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34(5): 958-64.
2.
Kothari PD, et.
al.
Longitudinal
Restriction Spectrum Imaging Is Resistant to Pseudoresponse
in Patients with High-Grade Gliomas Treated with Bevacizumab. AJNR Am
J Neuroradiol 2013;
34(9): 1752-7.
3.
Wen
Q, et.
al.
Comparison of ADC metrics and their association with outcome for
patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma being treated with
radiation therapy, temozolomide, erlotinib and bevacizumab. J
Neurooncol (2015) 121:331–339