Matthew David Blackledge1, Nina Tunariu1,2, Zaki Ahmed2, Julie Hughes2, Raquel Perez-Lopez1,2, Dow Mu Koh1,2, David J Collins1,2, and Martin O Leach1,2
1CRUK Cancer Imaging Center, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, 2MRI, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Synopsis
We evaluate the potential utility of storing all imaging acquisitions from whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (WBDWI) studies. This provides the possibility of using weighted least-squares fitting to obtain maps of ADC uncertainty, invaluable to clinicians wishing to report confidence in ADC estimates. Furthermore, we describe for the first time a novel post-processing technique that combines ADC and ADC uncertainty information into a single computed image: noise-corrected exponential WBDWI. We demonstrate that this technique provides excellent contrast between bone metastases and background healthy tissue, but does not suffer from the same T2 shine-through and/or coil sensitivity artefact present in conventional DW-images.Background
Whole-body
magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (WBDWI) is rapidly gaining
popularity as a visual tool for diagnosis and monitoring of patients with
metastatic bone disease from a range of primary malignancies [1]. WBDWI images
acquired at two or more b-values provide quantification of disease status via
measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) at each voxel
location. Common radiological practice
simultaneously utilizes both high b-value images and ADC maps to perform diagnosis
and staging of disease. However, ADC
maps are typically noisy and the degree of confidence in measured values is
unknown during radiological review. Typical
WBDWI measurements consist of multiple excitations (3-6) at each b-value, each
of which are acquired in three orthogonal directions to account for diffusion
anisotropy. Vendors typically export
only the average of all acquired images at each b-value (9-18) to improve image
signal-to-noise ratio and remove the effects of diffusion anisotropy.
Purpose
In this abstract we investigate the utility of storing
all single acquisitions in WBDWI scans.
We demonstrate the potential for estimating maps of ADC uncertainty from these data and discuss a new post-processing methodology for WBDWI examinations, namely, noise-corrected exponential
diffusion-weighted imaging (nc-eDWI).
Methods
Patients: Three patients with metastatic disease from prostate cancer. The research study received local ethics approval.
Imaging: Images were acquired on a 1.5T MRI scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens AG, Healthcare Sector, Erlangen, Germany). Parameters for the DWI scans included: b-values = 50/900 or 50/600/900 s/mm2, orthogonal diffusion encoding directions, STIR fat suppression (TI = 180ms), Slice Thickness = 5mm, GRAPPA image acquisition (reduction factor = 2). Images were acquired on a moving table in 4 stations comprising of 40 slices each to cover the entire torso. Images at each station were acquired 3 times, each with 1 signal average (NeX), and data from the individual diffusion encoding directions were exported individually. The final data set therefore consisted of 9 images acquired at each slice location at each b-value.
Image analysis: ADC maps were generated using a weighted linear least-squares fit of the logarithm of the image intensity at each voxel location [2]. The weighting applied at each b-value was calculated as the reciprocal of the log-signal variance from repeat measurements at that b-value, that is (Fig. 1) $$w(b) = \frac{1}{\text{Var}[\ln \text{S}(b)]}$$ In such a regime the maximum-likelihood estimates for ADC and the logarithm of the signal at b = 0, $$$\ln \text{S}(0)$$$, are given by $$(\widehat{\text{ADC}}, \widehat{\ln\text{S}(0)}) = (\mathbf{b}^{T}\mathbf{W}\mathbf{b})^{-1}\mathbf{b}^{T}\mathbf{W}\mathbf{s}$$where $$$\mathbf{s}$$$ represents the N-vector of log signal intensities at each voxel location, $$$\mathbf{W} = \text{diag}(w_{1}, w_{2}, \dots, w_{N})$$$ and $$$\mathbf{b}$$$ represents a Nx2 matrix, the first column being filled with all b-values used to generate $$$\mathbf{s}$$$ and the second filled with 1’s. The 2x2 covariance matrix for these estimates is given by $$\mathbf{\Sigma} = (\mathbf{b}^{T}\mathbf{W}\mathbf{b})^{-1}$$ such that the variance in ADC estimates is obtained by $$$\sigma^{2}_{\text{ADC}} = \mathbf{\Sigma}_{11}$$$. Maps of $$$\sigma_{\text{ADC}}$$$ can be generated and viewed alongside whole-body ADC maps to inform on the confidence of estimates within certain regions. Furthermore, to combine both sources of information into a single image we define the noise-corrected exponential diffusion weighted image (nc-eDWI) as a computed image [2] with the following signal intensity (Fig. 2): $$\text{S}_{\text{nc}}(a, b_{c}) = \exp\left(-a\cdot\sigma_{\text{ADC}} \right)\exp\left(-b_{c}\cdot\widehat{\text{ADC}} \right)$$Note that the computed b-value, $$$b_{c}$$$ and ADC uncertainty weighting, $$$a$$$, are both user defined. Using in-house developed software, we provide an interactive environment such that the user may alter these parameters in real-time. We use a $$$3\times3$$$ median filter on $$$\sigma_{\text{ADC}}$$$ maps to reduce the presence of noisy outliers.
Results
Figures 3-5 demonstrate three clinical examples
of the utility of nc-eDWI in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. It is clear that it is able to remove the
spurious discontinuities in signal intensity present at the inter-station
interface in normal high b-value whole body DWI studies. Furthermore, it can improve the contrast
between normal/metastatic bone, and removes the presence of non-DWI contrast
including T2 shine-through, T1-weighting, proton density and coil sensitivity.
Discussion and Conclusions
Here we
have investigated the utility of collecting and analysing all excitations from
whole-body DWI and shown that, at the cost of additional data storage
requirements, we are able to infer maps of confidence in the values of
calculated ADC. Such maps enable
clinicians to determine confidence in clinical decisions made using
quantitative DWI. Furthermore, the use
of noise-corrected eDWI provides diffusion-weighted contrast that is unaffected
by T2 shine-through and coil sensitivity, thus enabling comparison of signal
intensity in pre/post-treatment studies.
These methods, when used alongside conventional DWI analysis, will
provide a great deal of additional information for clinical review of patients
with metastatic bone disease.
Acknowledgements
CRUK and EPSRC support to the Cancer Imaging Centre at ICR and RMH in association with MRC and Department of Health C1060/A10334, C1060/A16464 and NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and the Clinical Research Facility in Imaging.References
[1] Padhani
A. R. et al., “Whole-body
diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cancer: current status and research directions.”
Radiology 2011; 261(3): 700-18.
[2]
Salvador R. et al., “Formal
characterization and extension of the linearized diffusion tensor model.” Hum.
Brain Map. 2005; 24(2): 144-155.
[3] Blackledge MD et al., “Computed diffusion-weighted MR imaging may improve tumor
detection.” Radiology 2011; 261(2): 573-81.