Marissa E. Fisher1, Brennen J. Dobberthien1, Anthony G. Tessier1,2, and Atiyah Yahya1,2
1Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Synopsis
The Cho peak at 3.2 ppm contains significant signal contamination from
the taurine (Tau) resonance in rat and mouse brain spectra, even at the high
field strength of 9.4 T. The purpose of this work it to
optimise TE1 and TE2 (echo times) of a Point RESolved
Spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence to minimize Tau signal in the Cho spectral region at 9.4 T by exploiting the J-coupling evolution of the Tau protons. The determined optimal {TE1,
TE2} combination was found to be {25 ms, 50
ms}. The efficacy of the timings was
verified on rat brain in vivo. INTRODUCTION
Levels of
choline containing compounds (Cho) have been shown to be relevant in the study
of brain disorders and brain development.
A number of studies have been conducted on rat or mouse models of
disease at high field strengths. The Cho
peak at about 3.22 ppm in rat and mouse brain spectra contains significant
signal contamination from the taurine (Tau) resonance at about 3.25 ppm, even
at the high field strength of 9.4 T (1,2). Quantification of Cho has been performed by
either relying on spectral fitting software such as LCModel (3,4) or by
subtracting the area of the other Tau resonance at ≈ 3.42 ppm from the combined Cho
and Tau peak (5,6).
The latter method may suffer from subtraction errors and uncertainties
from making the assumption that the two Tau resonances are identical in the
acquired spectrum. The choline protons are uncoupled; however,
those of Tau are involved in J-coupling interactions with each other. The purpose of this
work is to investigate the response of the J-coupled Tau protons to a PRESS (Point RESolved
Spectroscopy) sequence at 9.4 T as a function of the two echo times, TE
1
and TE
2, to find a TE combination that minimizes Tau signal in the
Cho spectral region in order to improve Cho quantification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experiments were performed with a 21.5 cm
diameter MRI 9.4 Tesla scanner. A
birdcage radiofrequency (RF) coil was used for phantom experiments and a
surface coil was employed for the animal scans.
Phantom spectra were acquired from a 10 mM creatine (Cr)/50 mM Tau
solution with the shortest TE combination achievable, namely, {TE
1,
TE
2} = {12 ms, 9 ms} and with TE
1 and TE
2
values ranging from 15 ms to 100 ms in steps of 5 ms. A TE combination which minimized the Tau
signal area in the 3.15 – 3.34 ppm region was selected as the optimal TE
combination. Spectra were also obtained from
a 10 mM Cr/ 50 mM Tau/ 5 mM Cho solution with the short-TE in addition to with
the determined optimal {TE
1, TE
2} combination. Spectra were acquired in 32 averages with a
repetition time, TR, of 5 s from 5 × 5 × 5 mm
3 voxels placed in the
centre of the phantom. A total of 8192 complex data points sampled at 10,000 Hz
were collected.
In-vivo spectra were acquired from the brains of three Sprague
Dawley rats from a 5 × 5 × 5 mm
3 voxel. A short-TE and an optimal TE spectrum were
obtained from each rat. Rat spectra were
measured as 2048 complex data points in 128 averages with a TR of 3 s and LCModel
software was used for analysis.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
An optimal TE combination that minimizes Tau signal
as a result of J-coupling evolution was found to be {TE
1, TE
2} = {25 ms, 50 ms}. Figure 1 shows short-TE and optimized-TE
spectra acquired from the Tau phantom. The area of the optimized-TE Tau peak is about
- 6.7 % of that obtained with the short-TE.
Figure 2 demonstrates the efficacy of the optimized sequence on the phantom
containing 5 mM Cho. The Tau signal is
significantly reduced revealing the complete Cho resonance. Figure 3 shows short-TE and optimized-TE
spectra obtained from one of the rats.
The Cho and Tau resonances are not resolved in the short-TE spectrum;
however, in the optimized-TE spectrum there is negligible Tau signal (low
signal to noise of Tau resulted in a concentration estimate of 0 with a CRLB of
999 %). Similar spectra and LCModel
results were obtained for all the three rats.
For each rat, the Cho CRLB was 3-4% for both the short-TE and
optimized-TE spectra. Assuming a T
2
of 178 ms for Cho (7), the T
2-corrected
Cho concentration obtained with the optimized-TE is about 78 % of that obtained
with the short-TE. The difference
indicates that the presence of Tau signal at short-TE affects Cho signal quantification.
CONCLUSION
It
has been demonstrated that a PRESS sequence with {TE
1, TE
2}
equal to {25 ms, 50 ms} is suitable for resolving the Cho signal (≈ 3.22 ppm)
from overlapping Tau signal
in vivo at
9.4 T. Further work will be conducted to
quantify the improvement in Cho quantification as a result of Tau signal
suppression.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Gruetter
R, Weisdorf SA, Rajanayagan V, et al. Resolution improvements in in vivo 1H NMR spectra with
increased magnetic field strength. J Magn Reson 1998;135:260-264.
2. Tkác
I, Henry P-G, Andersen O, Keene CD, Low WC, Gruetter R. Highly resolved in vivo
1H NMR spectroscopy of the mouse brain at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med
2004;52:478-484.
3. Morgan JJ, Kleven GA, Tulbert CD, Olson J, horita DA, Ronca
AE. Longitudinal 1H MRS of rat forebrain from infancy to adulthood
reveals adolescence as a distinctive phase of neurometabolite development. NMR
Biomed 2013;26:683-691.
4. Tkác
I, Rao R, Georgieff MK, Gruetter R. Developmental and regional changes in the
neurochemical profile of the rat brain determined by in vivo 1H NMR
spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:24-32.
5. Larvaron P, Bielicki G, Boespflug-Tanguy O, Renou J-P. Proton MRS of early post-natal mouse brain modifications in vivo. NMR Biomed 2006;19:180-187.
6. DeGraaf
RA, Brown PB, McIntyre S, Nixon TW, Behar KL, Rothman DL. High magnetic field
water and metabolite proton T1 and T2 relaxation in rat
brain in vivo. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:386-394.
7. Xin
L, Gambarota G, Mlynárik V, Gruetter R. Proton T2 relaxation time of
J-coupled cerebral metabolites in rat brain at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed
2008;21:396-401.