9.4 Tesla 1H-MRS of Glutamate and GABA in a 3.6 cubic-mm volume using an optimized UTE-STEAM sequence
Nicola Bertolino1, Paul Polak1, Marilena Preda1,2, Robert Zivadinov1,2, and Ferdinand Schweser1,2

1Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology,Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States, 2MRI Molecular and Translational Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States

Synopsis

In-vivo 1H-MR spectroscopy is a non-invasive technique able to detect metabolites providing important information from investigated tissue. GABA and Glutamate are two metabolites altered in many neurological diseases, although challenging to quantify in vivo because of a number of technical issues: voxel localization, low concentration, short T2, overlapping peaks and spin-spin coupling. In this work we developed an optimized parameter set for an ultra-short TE STEAM.

Introduction

1H-MRS (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) is an MRI technique that particularly benefits from moving to higher magnetic field strength, because of SNR improvements that allow the use of smaller voxels, mitigating line-broadening due to magnetic field inhomogeneities. There is strong interest in quantifying GABA and Glutamate (Glu), because they are altered in many neurological pathologies. However, these metabolites are among the most difficult to detect, due to their low concentration, and overlapping peaks. Detection of GABA and Glu improves with a short echo-time (TE), because of short T2 times and J-coupling1. The purpose of this work was to develop an optimized 1H-MRS pulse sequence for quantifying GABA and Glu in selected anatomical sub-structures of the mouse brain as small as 3.6mm3 in less than 20 minutes.

Methods

Setup and sequence optimization: All MRS measurements were performed on a 9.4 T Bruker Biospec scanner with a horizontal bore of 20 cm diameter (Biospec 94/20 USR, Bruker Biospin, Germany). We decided to employ a dual-channel cryogenic surface transceiver RF coil (CP) for improved signal-to-noise ratio. However, a limitation of this coil is that its power-limitations are relatively low (max. 20W) rendering the 180o pulses of the widely used PRESS sequence relatively long. In particular, due to the inhomogeneous flip angle profile of the CP, more pulse power is required to create a desired flip angle physically farther away from the coil (ventral) than closer (dorsal). The STEAM sequence employs only 90o pulses, allowing a much shorter TE with the same pulse power, but suffers from a reduction of the SNR by a factor of 2 compared to PRESS (at the same TE). To compare the two sequences we optimized them with respect to minimum TE using a 3.6mm3 voxel placed in the basal ganglia (BG; ventral location) resulting in TE=2.6ms for STEAM and TE=11.5ms for PRESS. Other parameters were identical: VAPOR 250Hz; 4096 points; 6010Hz. The sequence TR was optimized to yield the highest GABA/Glu signal per time interval resulting in TR=2s for T1=1.5s.2 With 512 averages this resulted in a measurement time of 17:12 min:sec. The PRESS sequence had a maximal (fat-water) spatial displacement of 1.19mm, the STEAM sequence 0.38mm.

Data acquisition: Experiments were performed in a SJL/J mouse and were approved by our Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee. Animals were anesthetized using 1-3% isoflurane under monitoring of respiration rate and body temperature. We applied both optimized sequences in two different brain regions with exactly equal voxel prescriptions: frontal cortex and BG with voxel volumes of 3.8 and 3.6mm3, respectively. Localized iterative shimming was performed before each MRS acquisition. A water spectrum was acquired before each sequence for eddy-current correction. To understand the benefit of using CP, we repeated the experiment with a standard room temperature (RT) cross-coil configuration employing a quadrature volume coil for excitation and a four-channel surface array coil for signal detection.

Data analysis: All spectra were analyzed using LCModel(v6.3) using appropriate basis sets for the two sequences. SNR of spectra was evaluated using the following relation [cf. Eq. section 2.4 in Ref. 5]: $$\frac{\textrm{maximum peak height}-\textrm{baseline-fit}}{\textrm{analysis window} _{ppm}*2*\textrm{RMS}(\textrm{fit residual})}$$

Resuts

Excellent spectral quality was obtained with both sequences using the CP configuration (Fig.1). The PRESS spectrum had a lower noise level but the overlapping peaks of GABA and Glu were better discernible in the STEAM spectrum due to the lower TE3. SNR levels of STEAM and PRESS were 9 and 10, respectively. The LCModel quantification yielded similar Cramér–Rao bounds (CRB) for GABA and Glu with both sequences, between 2% and 8%.

Fig.2 shows a comparison of the CP setup with the RT setup. The SNR was significantly reduced compared to the CP, with 3 for STEAM and 4 for PRESS. Due to the low SNR quantification of GABA and Glu was not possible (CRB>20%).

Fig.3 and 4 show voxel prescriptions and exemplary LCModel fits of the CP-based STEAM data in the BG and cortex.

Discussion and Conclusion

We demonstrated the feasibility of GABA and Glu quantification in anatomical sub-structures of the mouse brain with very low CRBs in 17 minutes acquisition time. STEAM and PRESS sequences yielded similar CRBs, but the PRESS had rather poor voxel localization compared to the STEAM sequence4, with a maximum displacement as large as the voxel edge length. The quantification of GABA and Glu was ultimately enabled by using the CP, which yielded a three fold improved SNR. To achieve the same SNR with RT, the number of averages would have to be an order of magnitude higher, leading to an impractical acquisition time of 3 hours.

Acknowledgements

References

1.Puts NAJ and Edden RAE. In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy of GABA: A methodological Review. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Volume 60, January 2012, Pages 29–41

2. Cudalbu C, Mlynárik V, Xin L and Gruette R. Comparison of T1 Relaxation Times of the Neurochemical Profile in Rat Brain at 9.4 Tesla and 14.1 Tesla. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Volume 62, Issue 4, pages 862–867, October 2009

3. Prescot1 AP, Shi X, Choi C and Renshaw PF. In vivo T2 relaxation time measurements with echo-time averaging. NMR in Biomedicine, Volume 27, Issue 8, pages 863–869, August 2014

4. Zhu H and Barker B. MR Spectroscopy and Spectroscopic Imaging of the human Brain. Methods Mol Biol.,2011: 711: 203-226

5. Provencher S. LCModel & LCMgui User's Manual. 2014

Figures

Fig.3 The voxel position in the Basal Ganglia of mouse brain is shown in the upper part, below it is displayed the STEAM sequence fitted spectra acquired with cryogenic coil set-up and in the right the metabolite concentration table with CRB values.

Fig.4 The voxel position in the Cortex of mouse brain is shown in the upper part, below it is displayed the STEAM sequence fitted spectra acquired with cryogenic coil set-up and in the right the metabolite concentration table with CRB values.

Fig.2 A confrontation between the STEAM sequence acquired in the Cortex with cryogenic coil set-up (up) and room temperature set-up (bottom). The improvment in SNR (from 3 to 9) and FWHM is visible from spectra and residuals.

Fig.1 A confrontation of the spectra acquired with STEAM (up) sequence and PRESS (bottom) sequence in Basal Ganglia with cryogenic coil set-up. The blue line under the spectra shows the regions where GABA multiplets are situated. The arrows point at the peaks in these regions higher in STEAM than PRESS sequence.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2383