Yuqi Yang1, Shizhen Chen1, Sha Li1, Lianhua Liu1, and Xin Zhou1
1Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
Two
types of water-insoluble texphyrins (TP), anticancer drug Gd-TP and photosensitizer
Lu-TP, were synthesized and loaded onto RGD-functionalized graphene quantum
dots (GQDs) via π-π stacking. The obtained complex could be used as a MRI-fluorecent
imaging multi-model probe for cancer therapy. Compared with conventional photodynamic
therapy (PDT), our method demonstrated better therapy efficiency for deeper
tissue, because a laser with longer wavelength was applied to active the
photosensitizer Lu-TP. Furthermore, reactive oxygen species resulted from the
reaction between redox active drug Gd-TP and cellular reducing metabolites and
photothermal effect from GQDs led cancer cells more impressionable to PDT from
Lu-TP. Introduction
In
the recent years, combining advantages of different types of therapy has gained
great attention to inhibit tumor growth. For example, codelivery of anti-cancer
drug doxorubicin and siRNA by mesoporous silica nanoparticle could overcome
drug resistance [1], the efficiency of photodynamic anticancer
treatment by photosensitizer hypocrellin was dramatically enhanced because of
the photothermal effect by
its carrier gold nanocage[2], the combination of doxorubicin and PEGylated
grapheme oxide showed a synergistic effect and lower systematic toxicity than
doxorubicin alone[3]. In this study, we have developed a new type of
molecular-targeted cancer therapy, biological redox enhanced photodynamic
therapy (PDT) and photothermal therapy (PTT), which used graphene quantum dots
(GQDs) as vehicle to simultaneously deliver anti-cancer drug gadolinium
texaphyrin (Gd-TP) and photosensitizer lutetium texaphyrin (Lu-TP) to human
lung cancer cells. The presence of paramagnetic Gd(Ⅲ) and the fluorescent
from vehicle and drugs could be used to estimate the therapeutic efficiency by
MRI and fluorescence imaging.
Methods
Two
water insoluble drugs, Gd-TP and Lu-TP, were loaded onto c(RGDyk) (a targeted
peptide) modified orange emission graphene quantum dots via π-conjugative
interaction. With the photothermal effect by GQDs and biological redox
enhancement by Gd-TP, the PDT efficiency has been increased dramatically, which
induced cancer cell death immediately by using very low doses of PDT (Fig. 1). Moreover,
with the increased hydrophilicity and solubility of TP in cancer cells,
Lu-TP&Gd-TP released from GQDs and exhibit a strong deep-red recovered
fluorescence imaging and an enhanced T1 MRI in vivo.
Results and
Discussion
After
a 765 nm irradiation at a power density of 50 mW/cm2 for 2 min, apoptosis
(white arrows) arose when human lung cancer cells were treated with Gd-TP/GQDs-RGD
or Lu-TP/GQDs-RGD. Meanwhile, most of the irradiated cells treated with Lu-TP&Gd-TP/GQDs-RGD
were necrotic (yellow
arrows, Fig. 2). These
evidences corroborated the point that the addition of redox active drug Gd-TP
strongly promoted apoptosis and/or necrosis in PDT.
It has been widely reported that graphene oxide
in reduced form could absorb NIR light and produce heat.[4] In this
study, one of the graphene derivative, GQDs, were obtained by two steps: carbon
nanotubes were oxidized in acid, and then reduced and cut into small pieces of
GQDs by microwave-assisted hydrothermal method. In vivo results showed the surface temperature of tumors site on GQDs
injected mice arose from 34.6 °C to 39.4°C after irradiation, in contrast to 1.3 °C temperature rise for
irradiated tumors on uninjected mice (Fig. 3).
Conclusion
The
designed probe combined PDT, PTT with biological redox reaction in a new
synergistic treatment modalitie, not only fulfills the solubility and
selectivity but also constitutes a promising new tumor-targeted theranostics
agent that can enhance significantly the efficacy of PDT and real-time
dual-modality imaging during targeted therapy.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]
Meng H, Mai W X, Zhang H, et al. ACS Nano, 2013, 7(2): 994-1005.
[2] Gao
L, Fei J, Zhao J, et al. ACS Nano,
2012, 6(9): 8030-8040.
[3]
Zhang W, Guo Z, Huang D, et al. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(33):
8555-8561.
[4]
Robinson J T, Tabakman S M, Liang Y, et al. . Journal of the
American Chemical Society, 2011, 133(17): 6825-6831.