Begona Lavin Plaza1, Alkystis Phinikaridou1, Marcelo Andia2, Silvia Lorrio Gonzalez1, and Rene Botnar1
1Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
Synopsis
Despite
the beneficial effect of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and
stent implantation, negative vascular remodeling remains as one of the most
important complications of interventional cardiology. These procedures may damage
the vessel wall, particularly the endothelium, leading to a dysfunctional state
characterized by impaired vasodilation, increased leukocyte adhesion and
permeability that constitute the initial steps of atherosclerosis. The arterial
tree can be divided in either “athero-susceptible” areas, e.g. arterial
branches and curvatures, where blood flow is turbulent and shear stress is
multidirectional or “athero-resistant” areas, e.g. abdominal aorta, where blood
flow is laminar and shear stress is low. In this study, we investigated (1)
whether an “atherosclerotic-resistant” segment of the vascular tree, like the
aorta, can be switched into an “atherosclerotic-susceptible” area following
endothelial injury and (2) whether such a switch in vessel wall remodeling is
associated with changes in vascular permeability that can be assessed in-vivo using the albumin binding MR
contrast agent, gadofosveset.INTRODUCTION
Despite
the beneficial effect of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and
stent implantation, these procedures may damage the vessel wall, particularly
the endothelium leading to a dysfunctional state characterized by impaired
vasodilation, increased vascular permeability and leukocyte infiltration that
initiate atherosclerosis. The arterial system can be divided in “athero-susceptible”
areas, e.g. arterial branches, where blood flow is turbulent and shear stress
is multidirectional and “athero-resistant” areas, e.g. abdominal aorta, where
blood flow is laminar and shear stress is low. Previous studies have shown that
contrast-enhanced MRI using gadofosveset, an albumin-binding contrast agent,
can detect endothelial damage, angiogenesis and vascular permeability in
different animal models of vascular disease1-3. In this study, we
sought to investigate the impact of endothelial injury in an “atherosclerotic-resistant”
area and whether imaging with gadofosveset could be used to evaluate focal
changes of vascular permeability and remodeling in-vivo.
METHODS
The
study design is summarized in Figure 1.
In-vivo
MRI: A clinically approved albumin-binging contrast agent
(gadofosveset) was used to assess focal changes in vascular permeability in
three different groups of ApoE-/- mice; (1) 8-weeks-old male ApoE-/- mice were switched
to high fat diet (containing 21% fat from lard and 0.15% (wt/wt) cholesterol),
as an established model of hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis (n=6); (2) in the vascular injury group mice
underwent endothelial denudation surgery3 and were switched to HFD
following surgery (n=9); (3) in the
treatment group, ApoE-/- mice underwent vascular injury followed by
HFD and pravastatin treatment (40mg/kg/day) administered in drinking water
(n=6). A subgroup of ApoE-/- mice (n=6) was imaged before
intervention and HFD diet and used as controls. A 3T Philips Achieva system and a 47mm single loop microscopy
surface coil were used. Images were acquired 30min after intravenous
administration of 0.03mmol/kg gadofosveset. Phase-contrast-angiography
images were acquired with a FOV=35x35x12mm, matrix=233x233, in-plane-resolution=0.15x0.15x0.5mm,
TR/TE=28/6ms and flip angle=40°. 3D
gradient-echo DE-MRI images were acquired with a FOV=35x35x12mm,
matrix=348x348, in-plane-resolution=0.1x0.1x1mm, TR/TE=27/8ms, TR between
subsequent IR pulses=1000ms, and flip angle=30°. T1 mapping was performed using
3D Look-Locker sequence that employs two non-selective inversion pulses with
inversion times ranging from 20ms to 2000ms, followed by eight segmented
readouts for eight individual images. The two imaging trains result in a set of
16 images per slice with increasing inversion times. The acquisition parameters
were: FOV=36x22x10mm, matrix=180x102, in-plane-resolution=0.2x0.2x0.5mm,
TR/TE=9/4.6ms, flip angle=10°. T1 values were computed on a pixel-by-pixel
basis using in-house software algorithm (Matlab). Histology: BCA
was stained with Masson’s trichrome to examine the vascular remodeling.
RESULTS
Longitudinal
DE-MRI using gadofosveset (Fig. 2)
showed a significant progressive enhancement of the abdominal aorta in the
injury group (Fig. 2E-G) compared to
the HFD group (Fig. 2B-D).
Importantly, there was decreased uptake in the treatment group, demonstrating
the improvement that statins exert on vascular permeability (Fig. 2H). Very little uptake was
detected in the baseline group (Fig. 2A).
Histological images revealed advanced atherosclerosis in the injury group (Fig. 2J), less advanced disease in the
treatment group (Fig. 2K) and no
atherosclerosis in the HFD group (Fig. 2I)
after 12 weeks. Quantitative analysis of vessel wall enhancement (Fig. 3A) and relaxation rate R1 (Fig. 3B) showed increased vascular
permeability in the injury group 12 weeks after denudation as compared to HFD
and treatment groups. No quantitative changes in the luminal area of the
abdominal aorta were detected between groups (Fig. 3C) suggesting that luminal area is preserved in spite of
increased vascular remodeling and plaque progression.
CONCLUSIONS
In
this study, we demonstrate that vascular injury together with dietary
hyperlipidemia causes the formation of atherosclerotic lesions in an otherwise “atherosclerosis-resistant”
segment of the aorta compared with hypercholesterolemia alone. The switch into
an “atherosclerotic-susceptible” area is associated with increased vascular
permeability that can be assessed in-vivo
using the albumin binding MR contrast agent, gadofosveset.
Acknowledgements
British Heart Foundation (RG/12/1/29262)References
(1)
Pedersen, S.F., et al. JCMR, 2011. (2) Phinikaridou, A., et al.
Circulation, 2012. (3) Lavin
B., et al. Circulation: Cardiovasc Imag. 2015.