Biodegradable glycoged-based nanoprobe as a multimodal tumor-targeting contrast agent
Andrea Galisova1, Daniel Jirak1, Marketa Jiratova1, Martin Hruby2, Maria Rabyk2, Aneta Pospisilova2, and Milan Hajek1

1MR Unit, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic, 2Academy of Sciences, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Prague, Czech Republic

Synopsis

An effective cancer diagnostic and therapeutic contrast agent with suitable properties including high specificity and safety is on high demand. In this study, accumulation of a biocompatible and biodegradable glycogen-based nanoprobe (GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy) was tested and compared to a commercially available contrast agent (gadoterate meglumine). Relaxivity and MR imaging of the probe was performed on the phantoms. The uptake of the agents was measured on the tumor-bearing rats at several time points after the contrast agent administration by MRI and fluorescence imaging. We found out that the novel probe is superior to a commercially available contrast agent regarding the relaxivity and accumulation in the tumor tissue.

Purpose

An effective cancer diagnostic and therapeutic contrast agent with suitable properties including high specificity, safety and cost is on high demand. Biocompatible and biodegradable glycogen-based nanoprobe has been already proposed as a promising tumor-targeting contrast agent1. Glycogen (GG) core was modified by a gadolinium and a fluorescent (cyanin) dye Dy-615 (GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy) for multimodal imaging. In this study, we examined biodistribution and accumulation of the probe in the tumor-bearing rats by MR and fluorescence imaging and we compared the efficiency of GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy with a commercially available contrast agent (gadoterate meglumine – Gd-DOTA-GM).

Material and Methods

The properties of the probes were assessed by r1 relaxometry (0.5T, saturation recovery sequence, recycle delay 12s or 5s) and MR imaging (4.7T, T1-weighted images, RARE sequence, TR=333ms, TE=12ms, turbo factor TF=3, number of acquisition NA=16). Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for each probe concentration. The toxicity of glycogen-based probes was assessed in vitro on the HepG2 tumor cell line by MTT assay. The tumors were induced in four RNU nude rats by injection of 5 mil. of tumor cells (HepG2 or Huh7) into the subcutaneous area above the hind leg. Three weeks after tumor induction, T1-weighted images (4.7T, RARE sequence, TR=630 ms, TE=14ms, TF=2, NA=8, resolution 0.19x0.19x1.5 mm3) were acquired before and after intravenous administration of GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy (0.006 mmol/kg) and Gd-DOTA-GM (0.006; 0.012; 0.024 mmol/kg). Relative CNR values normalized to muscle tissue were calculated from the manually outlined region of interest containing tumor or kidney. Fluorescence was measured on IVIS Lumina imager (excitation at 605 nm, blue shifted background excitation at 550 nm, emission filter 695-770 nm).

Results

Relaxivity and corresponding CNR values of GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy compound were markedly higher compared to Gd-DOTA-GM (Fig. 1). In vitro experiments confirmed non-toxicity of glycogen-based probes on the cells. After intravenous administration in the animals, both GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy and Gd-DOTA-GM were accumulated in the tumor and kidneys (Fig. 2). The signal enhancement in both organs was higher using GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy; even the administration of lower concentration of GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy (0.006 mmol/kg) compared to Gd-DOTA-GM (0.024 mmol/kg) led to a higher CNR increase (Fig. 2E,F). Moreover, the signal enhancement by GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy persisted in the tumor for a long time (up to 24 hours). After injection, fluorescent signal increases in the internal organs (kidneys, liver, gastro-intestinal tract (GIT), bladder) as well as in the tumor tissue (Fig. 3).

Discussion

We confirmed superior MR properties of our novel GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy compound including relaxivity and CNR compared to the commercially available contrast agent gadoterate meglumine. The glycogen-based nanoprobe was effectively accumulated in the tumor tissue confirming its tumor-targeting property and the contrast increase was higher compared to gadoterate meglumine. The contrast enhancement was long-lasting (24 hours) suggesting continuous accumulation into the tumor tissue by EPR (enhanced permeability and retention) effect.

Conclusion

In this study, the tumor-targeting properties of a biocompatible and non-toxic glycogen-based nanoprobe were assessed by in vivo multimodal imaging. The novel probe was superior to a commercially available contrast agent.

Acknowledgements

Supported by MH CR-DRO (Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine IKEM, IN00023001) and the Ministry of Health, Czech Republic (grant #15-25781A).

References

References: 1. Aasen, Int. J. Mol. Sci 2015

Figures

Fig.1 A T1-weighted image of various concentration of GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy (A). The numbers represent concentration in mM, w-water reference. Comparison of CNR values (B) and r1- relaxivities (C) of GG and GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy probe with a commercially available contrast agent (gadoterate meglumine-GM).

Fig.2 Representative T1-weighted MR images of the rat tumor and kidney before (A, C) and after (C, D) GG-Gd-DOTA-Dy probe administration. Comparison of the relative CNR values calculated from tumor (E) and kidney (F) area after injection of contrast agents of various concentration (100% represents CNR before contrast agent administration).

Fig.3 Fluorescent images of the rat after GG-DOTA-Gd-Dy injection. Spectral unmixed image shows distribution of contrast agent in the animal (A). Difference images of the tumor (blue-shifted emmision light subtracted) after 0.5 hour (B) and 24 hours (C) after contrast application.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2309