David J Kahn1, Daniel Mittelstaedt1, and Yang Xia1
1Physics and Center for Biomedical Research, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, United States
Synopsis
High-resolution T2 imaging
of AC is able to quantitatively measure depth-dependent features of articular
cartilage (AC). When the cartilage articular surface (AS) is oriented normal
(0°) to the external magnetic field, healthy AC takes on a laminar appearance
that indicates the superficial zone (SZ), transitional zone (TZ), and radial
zone (RZ), where collagen fibers are oriented parallel, random, and
perpendicular to the AS [1]. When the AS is oriented at the magic angle (55°),
the nuclear dipolar interaction is minimized and the tissue appears
homogeneous. Compression of AC has effects that change many zonal properties [2,3],
and hypertrophy may alter the biomechanical function and depth-dependent
collagen ultra-structure of AC.Target
Audience
Researchers
and clinicians in the orthopedic fields will benefit from this study.
Purpose
A
preliminary observational study to correlate quantitative T2, zonal, and
biomechanical changes of hypertrophied articular cartilage using
high-resolution microscopic magnetic resonance imaging (μMRI).
Methods
Three
canines underwent anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) in one knee,
and sacrificed 25 weeks post-operatively. ACLT medial tibiae were sectioned to
obtain three blocks approximately 2.6mm x 5mm, then sealed in 5mm glass MR
tubes with a 154mM saline solution containing 1% protease inhibitor and 1mM gadolinium contrast agent.
Magnetization-prepared T2-weighted imaging was performed on a Bruker Ascend
300WB 7T/89mm vertical bore magnet with an attached Bruker imaging accessory.
T2 imaging was performed with the cartilage articular surface oriented normal
(0°) and at the magic angle (55°) with respect to the external magnetic field
(B
o). T2-weighting was performed using five contrast echo times (TE
c)
of 2, 10, 20, 40, and 80ms for 55° and 2, 8, 20, 40, and 70ms for 0°, and an imaging
echo time (TE
i) of 7.2ms. The field of view was 4.5mm with an
acquisition matrix of 256 x 128 (reconstructed to 256 x 256), which yielded a
pixel resolution of 17.6μm. The samples were removed from the glass tubes and compressed to a
strain of 18.5±4.6% in a homemade loading device, then resealed in the glass MR tubes and
scanned using the identical protocol. Slice selection was taken as close as
possible to the uncompressed slice selection (near the center of the tissue
block). The T2 images were calculated using Matlab from the five weighted
images by fitting an exponential curve for each pixel. T2 profiles were
obtained by averaging 10 columns from the calculated T2 images, and plotted on
a relative scale from 0 to 1, indicating the articular surface and bone,
respectively. After μMRI, the blocks were cut in half at the slice location; one half
was then compressed and one half remained uncompressed. The two halves were fixated in a
cetylpyridinium chloride and 10% formol solution overnight, then frozen in ice
and cryotomed to 6μm sections using a Leica CM1950 cryostat. The sections were laid on a
glass slide and covered with a glass coverslide and fixed using Permount.
Polarized light microscopy (PLM) was performed at 10x objective magnification
on a Leica DMRX microscope with attached CRI Abrio imaging accessories. The
retardation images were used in comparing μMRI and histological features.
Results
T2@0°
(Fig. 3b,c) images qualitatively show the zonal changes in hypertrophied
cartilage. PLM images (Fig. 3c,f) show the uncompressed hypertrophied cartilage
(Fig. 3b) SZ is markedly increased in thickness compared to normal cartilage
(Fig. 1a). After compression (Fig. 3e,f), the SZ was markedly reduced with
minimal effect on the TZ, and nearly no effect on the RZ. T2@0° profiles (Fig.
4b) exhibit a double-peak shape for uncompressed, and a single-peak with near
bell-shape curvature for compressed. The uncompressed PLM images (Fig. 3c)
confirm the first peak is a hypertrophied region. The
T2@55° (Fig. 3a,d) images show the SZ is the main part to be affected by
compression. A significant drop in T2 (Fig. 4b) (compressed) was seen through
approximately 0.4 relative depth (uncompressed), matching well with the
hypertrophied zones, and little or no change for deeper tissue.
Discussion
The T2@55° is highly
sensitive to water content within the tissue since the nuclear dipolar
interaction is minimized, effectively eliminating a factor that influences T2
relaxation. Therefore, we can more accurately measure the regions affected by
compression, since loading reduces the local concentration of water in the
tissue. The only significant T2 change occurred in the upper hypertrophied
regions, in contrast to healthy cartilage (Fig 2a), which exhibits whole-tissue
reduction [3]. The increase in cell volume and number decreased the
biomechanical stiffness of the hypertrophied region since cells have a
much lower modulus than the extracellular matrix [4], which caused the sharp T2@55° change in the
upper regions after compression. In contrast, healthy tissue (Fig. 2a) exhibits
a decrease in all regions of the tissue [3]. The significant decrease in SZ
thickness indicates a highly compliant hypertrophied upper region, in contrast
to healthy AC, which changes less in the SZ due to compression.
Conclusion
μMRI allows for studying the
remarkable structural and biomechanical properties of hypertrophied articular
cartilage. High-resolution T2-weighted imaging, in conjunction with standard
optical imaging techniques, can link structural defects of cartilage with T2
images under uncompressed and compressed conditions. We found the biomechanical
properties to be significantly altered due to hypertrophy. These types of
studies can lead to advancements in diagnostics and the detection of early
onset OA, and may even lead to studies for alternative treatment utilizing
altered metabolic reactions.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the NIH
for the RO1 grant (AR52353), and Dr. John Matyas (Calgary) for providing the
samples.References
[1]
Xia Y, et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997; 7:887-894. [2]
Alhadlaq H, et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004; 12:887-894. [3]
Lee JH, et al. Connect Tissue Res. 2014; 55(3): 205-216. [4] Guilak F, et al. Osteoarthritis
Cartilage. 1999; 7:59-70.