Jin Qu1, Xinwei Lei1, Ying ZHAN1, Huixia Li1, and Yu Zhang2
1Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China, People's Republic of, 2Philips Healthcare, Beijin, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
The purpose of this study was to evaluate articular
cartilage degeneration in healthy subjects and patients with knee joint-pain as
the only clinical manifestation using T1ρ measurements and to examine the
interrelationship between cartilage abnormalities. Quantitative assessment of
cartilage was performed using T1ρ mapping technique in 5 healthy volunteers and
17 knee joint-pain patients. T1ρ values were significantly elevated among
patients with knee joint-pain compared to normal controls. Proteoglycan reduced
in patients with knee joint-pain as the only clinical manifestation. Comparing
to routine MR, T1ρ mapping could be more useful for these patientsPurpose:
T1ρ
mapping with quantitative biochemical measurements of proteoglycan provides non-invasive
means of detecting early composition changes in cartilage degeneration prior to
morphological or clinical changes.
1,2 T1ρ mapping have been used to
study cartilage changes of confirmed osteoarthritis (OA), but not any studies
of undiagnosed OA. The characteristics of cartilage degeneration in early OA patients
with knee-joint pain alone in vivo using T1ρ measurements not previously been evaluated.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of T1ρ relaxation
times of the knee with early degenerative cartilage changes, and detect subtle pathological
course related to early OA.
Methods:
We included 5 age-matched healthy volunteers and
17 patients (10 male, 7 female age
= 25.88 ±1.92 years)
who had knee-joint pain without evidence of OA according to their Kellgrene Lawrence
(KL) score of 0. Subjects were excluded if they had any performance of cartilage
degeneration judged by routine MRI including T1WI and T2WI sequences. The
control volunteers had no history of diagnosed OA, clinical OA symptoms, previous
knee injuries, or signs of OA on radiographs or/and
routine MRI. All images were acquired on a 3.0T MR scanner (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare,
Best, the Netherlands) using a 16-channel flexible wrap-around coil. The
T1ρ sequences had the following parameters: FOV=140×140,
matrix 352x350, slice thickness=4mm, number of slices: 20 slices, TSL=[0,10,20,30,40,ms],
spin lock frequency=1700Hz, TE=[0 0,3.4,6.8,10.3,20.5,34.2,47.8,61.5ms], TR/TE=7/3ms,
B1=11.5μT, TFE factor=64, Scantime=2:25/SL. The T1ρ map was generated on a
pixel-by-pixel basis on Philips Research Integrated Development Environment
(PRIDE) software written in Interactive Data Language using a mono-exponential
decay model: M (TSL) = M0*exp (-TSL/ T1ρ). Cartilage was segmented into the
following compartments: lateral/medial femoral condyle (LFC/MFC),
lateral/medial tibia (LT/MT), lateral/medial trochlea (LTRO/MTRO) and patella
(PAT), and subcompartments of femoral-tibial cartilage were defined as shown in
Figure 1. T1ρ values in different compartments were compared using one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA), and for T1ρ values differences between the two groups
in the same compartment were compared with t- test by
using IBM SPSS Statistics 20 .0 (Armonk, New York, USA) where P<0.05
indicated a significant difference.
Results:
There
were significant differences in T1ρ values among all the compartments in the
joint-pain group (F=2.572, P=0.001). No significant differences in T1ρ values
were observed among all the compartments in the control group (f=0.468, P=0.954).
In the joint-pain group, there were significant differences in T1ρ values among
medial femoral (MF) compartments, including MFC and MTRO (F=9.468, P=0.000),
but no significant differences among lateral femoral (LF) compartment were
found, including LFC and LTRO (F=2.193, P=0.77). T1r values were significantly
higher in the cMFc (weight-bearing cartilage) compartments compared to the
other compartments in MF (MTRO, cMFa, cMFp, pMF). There was no significant
differences among compartments in MT (F=0.525, P=0.595) and LT (F=1.007,
P=0.373). T1ρ values were significantly higher in all compartments except two compartments (cLFa and
LTa) in the joint-pain group compared to the control
group (table 1, Figure 2).
Discussion:
In our study, T1ρ values were significantly higher in most part of the cartilage in knee joint with
pain alone even before the morphological changes suggesting proteoglycan loss
in human articular cartilage occur in a very early stage. The knee joint-pain suggesting
early cartilage
degeneration has been occurred even without abnormality in routine MR. The significant differences in T1ρ values among all
the compartments in the joint-pain group indicated that the degree of cartilage degeneration in
different part of knee joint was uneven, and the control group without loss of
proteoglycans had no significant differences in T1ρ values in
the total knee joint. There were no significantly differences for T1ρ values in
cLFa and LTa between knee joint-pain and control group, this may result from less
weight-bearing in cLFa and LTa, and cMFc
the main weight-bearing cartilage in medial femoral shows
higher T1ρ values.
34Conclusion:
T1ρ relaxation times are significantly elevated among
patients with knee joint-pain compared to the one in normal controls. In this
study, we have demonstrated that proteoglycan was
reduced in patients with knee joint-pain as the only clinical manifestation. Comparing
to routine MR, T1rho mapping sequence may be more useful for the assessment of
cartilage degeneration in patients with knee joint-pain alone.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Jobke
B, Bolbos R, Saadat E,et al. Mechanism of disease in early osteoarthritis:
application of modern MR imaging techniques – a technical report. Magn Reson
Imaging. 2013 Jan;31(1):156-61.
2. Koff
MF, Potter HG. Noncontrast MR techniques and imaging of cartilage. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009 May;47(3):495-504.
3. Souza
RB, Kumar D, Calixto N, et al. Response of knee cartilage T1rho and T2
relaxation times to in vivo mechanical loading in individuals with and without
knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Oct;22(10):1367-76.
4. Goto
H, Iwama Y, Fujii M, et al. The natural
degeneration course in the T1rho values of normal knee cartilage. Kobe J Med Sci. 2012 Jun 7;57(4):E155-70.