Daehyun Yoon1, Sandip Biswal1, Brian Rutt1, Amelie Lutz1, and Brian Hargreaves1
1Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
Synopsis
For the
past few decades, MRI has been increasingly used for identifying peripheral
nerve injury, causing chronic and neuropathic pain. Unfortunately, a
substantial number of MRI examinations fails to find the causative nerve
damage, possibly because it is too subtle or small. Recent developments of
PET-MRI demonstrated improved detection capability of the nerve damage, but the
precise anatomic characterization of the detected lesion still remains
challenging. We introduce high-resolution 3D steady-state imaging sequences at
7T that enable examination of microstructures of peripheral nerves in
extremities. We believe our methods have great potential for improving diagnosis
of various pain syndromes.Purpose
To
introduce high-resolution 3D steady-state imaging for examining microstructural
nerve injury with 7T MRI.
Introduction
In
chronic and neuropathic pain management, MRI examination is frequently ordered
to search the nerve injury causing pain. Unfortunately, anatomical information
captured with conventional MR imaging approaches has had limited efficacy in
the accurate identification of nerve injury
1. Recently, simultaneous
[18F] FDG PET-MRI has shown great promise for enhanced detection of the nerve
injury by combining [18F] FDG PET’s sensitivity to inflammation with MRI’s
high-resolution anatomic information of the nerve injury
2. However,
our experience with simultaneous PET-MRI so far suggests that there still remains
a lack of anatomic visualization and characterization of the actual nerve injury
or exact appearance of neuroinflammation since the causative nerve injury might
be too subtle or small. Here, we present ultra-high-resolution 3D steady-state
imaging sequences at 7T that can visualize microstructures of peripheral nerves
in the extremities to enable advanced diagnosis for subtle structural nerve
damage causing pain.
Methods
We
performed 3D steady-state imaging with FISP and PSIF3,4 sequences. In
FISP, the image contrast is dominated by FID while that of PSIF is dominated by
echo pathways, resulting in (roughly) T1 weighting for FISP and T2/diffusion weighting
for PSIF. FISP images capture much greater anatomic details with higher
resolution than PSIF due to their SNR advantage, but limited contrast between
nerves and blood vessels can cause confusion. This ambiguity can be resolved
with PSIF images because the diffusion weighting of PSIF can be set in a
direction parallel to the blood vessel to suppress the signal from flowing
blood. Also, the SNR boost from 3D imaging, 7T, and use of a surface coil for
signal reception enable the in-plane resolution in the range of 100um.
We conducted
an initial survey to compare anatomic nerve details between 3T and 7T FISP images
to demonstrate the advantage of 7T MRI for imaging micro nerve structures. We
also performed FISP and PSIF imaging on different human extremities including
foot, ankle, and finger. For high resolution FISP imaging, the in-plane image
resolution was about 0.12 x 0.12mm2 over 8.0 x 6.4 cm FOV while the slice
thickness was 1.5-2mm. For PSIF imaging, the in-plane resolution was 0.25 x
0.25mm2 over 8.0 x 6.4 cm FOV with 2mm slice thickness. The imaging
experiments were conducted on a GE 7T Discovery MR950 scanner and a GE 3T Discovery MR750 scanner
(GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, U.S.). A single channel receive surface coil was
used at 7T and a 16 channel GEM flex coil was used in 3T. All images except Fig.
2A are water images obtained by 2-point Dixon fat-water separation.
Results and Discussion
Simplified
pulse sequence diagrams of FISP and PSIF sequences are plotted in Fig. 1. In FISP,
signal acquisition occurs before the spoiler, while In PSIF, signal acquisition
takes place after the spoiler, and this acquisition timing difference leads to
the aforementioned contrast difference. Fig. 2 compares axial FISP images of a
human ankle collected at different field strengths with different resolution. Red
arrows in Fig. 2A point to tibial nerves, which are magnified in Fig. 2B. Fig. 2B
demonstrates that more details of the fascicular pattern of the tibial nerve
can be captured as resolution improves (0.4mm x 0.4mm to 0.12mm x 0.12mm) and
7T enables more clear delineation of the fascicular pattern. Fig. 3 compares
axial FISP and PSIF images of a human ankle. The red arrows point to blood
vessels and the green arrow points to a tibial nerve. While it is very
difficult to differentiate between blood vessels and the tibial nerve in the
FISP image, blood-flow nulling with diffusion weighting in PSIF led to clear
distinction between them. Fig. 4 shows an axial FISP image of human second and
third fingers. The third finger shows normal course of the vessels (red arrows)
and nerves (yellow arrows) at the level of the DIP joint whereas the second
finger demonstrates distortion of the subcutaneous tissue by scar (short green
arrow) and edema formation (orange asterisk) with associated altered course of
the vessels (red arrows) and nerves (yellow arrows) along the radial aspect of
the distal phalanx. Fig. 5 shows an axial FISP image of a human foot, and nerve
swelling from Morton’s neuroma (red arrow) is clearly distinguished from normal
interplantar neurovascular bundles (green arrows).
Conclusion
We presented
ultra-high-resolution 3D steady-state imaging at 7T to enable in-vivo examination of microstructures
in peripheral nerves. We believe our approach has great promise for enhancing
diagnosis and treatment planning for peripheral nerve injury and pain
management.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by NIH P41-EB015891 and GE Healthcare.References
[1] Neuropathy, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, http://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases_conditions/hic-neuropathy.
[2] Behera D et al. [18F]FDG PET/MRI of patients with chronic pain alters
management: Early Experience. WMIC 2015.
[3] Gyngell ML. The application of steady-state free precession in rapid
2DFT NMR imaging: FAST and CE-FAST sequences. MRI. 1988;6:415–419.
[4] Sekihara
K. Steady-state magnetizations in rapid NMR imaging using small flip angles and
short repetition intervals. TMI. 1987;6:157–164