Kevin M Koch1, Matthew F Koff2, Parina Shah2, S S Kaushik1, Andrew Nencka1, and Hollis G Potter2
1Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 2Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
The failure of hip arthroplasty may be attributed to
metallic or polyethylene debris generated from implant components. The metallic components, and their associated
debris are composed of cobalt-chromium alloys, which have a strong paramagnetic
magnetic susceptibility relative to biological materials. Previously, we demonstrated a mechanism to
utilize MRI data to qualitatively highlight cobalt-chromium debris deposits in
vivo. In the current study, we extend
this work to provide a quantifiable regional metallosis metric. In addition, this regional quantitative
metric is shown to statistically correlate with local histology metallosis
scores in subjects undergoing total hip revision surgery.
Introduction
In 2013, over 340,000
total hip replacements (THA) were installed in the US [1]. THA
has a failure rate of 6% and 13% at 5 and 10-year benchmarks [2], which often may be related to metallic and polyethylene debris deposition from implant
components. Implanted cobalt chromium metallic components and their associated debris particles have a strong paramagnetic magnetic susceptibility
relative to biological materials. In
cases of symptomatic THA, it is sometimes possible to identify debris from
magnitude MRI data. However, in such
cases it is also clinically advantageous to differentiate metallic debris from
polymeric debris given the more serious tissue necrosis associated with
metallic debris. Previously, we
demonstrated a mechanism to utilize magnetic field maps produced with
intermediate data provided by 3D-MSI artifact-reduction sequences [3] to
qualitatively highlight cobalt-chromium debris deposits
in vivo [4]. Here, we extend this work to provide a
quantifiable regional metallosis metric, reported here as the 'mScore'. In a cohort of 15 subjects undergoing total
hip revision surgery, regional mScores were computed using pre-operative 3D-MSI
imaging data and then correlated with histological metallosis scores from local
tissue samples retrieved during surgery.
Methods
The algorithm utilized to compute mScores from MRI data is
provided in Figure 1. Briefly, a region
of interest is identified in the 3D-MSI MRI. Intermediate 3D-MSI
spectral data is then used to identify tissue (i.e., non-implant or noise
voxels) and construct magnetic field maps across these voxels (which are
spectral-bin intensity-based field map estimates). These maps are regionally processed using a
background field removal technique, which exposes the local tissue-specific
magnetic field [5]. Clusters of field offsets are then identified at N levels of Larmor frequency offsets (300 350 400 450
500) Hz and M cluster volume
thresholds (60,120,240,360,480) mm3.
The volume of identified clusters at these settings forms an NxM
matrix. After applying an exponential
weighting to the matrix elements (which can be used to tighten mScores for a
wide spectrum of metallosis severity), the elements are summed to form the
mScore.
Following IRB approval with informed written consent, 15
patients were enrolled in our study and tissue samples (~1cm3) were
extracted during revision THA surgery from regions of suspected particulate
debris based on pre-operative MRI. Histological scoring was performed on these
samples using the Fujishiro metal particle score, which ranges from 0 (no metal
particles) to 4 (significant metal particles).
Due to the uncertainty of precise sample locations extracted during
surgery, a relatively large volume (120 cm3) surrounding the
indented extraction point was utilized for mScore analysis.
Results
Figure 2 presents a magnitude 3D-MSI (MAVRIC SL) image around a THA. The arrow indicates the region where a tissue
sample was extracted. A 3D-MSI based
field map is also shown in Figure 2, which is dominated by a dipolar field
signature from the cobalt-chromium femoral head component. Figure 3 depicts a zoomed image of this map
in the identified region of interest, along with a background field-suppressed
residual tissue off-resonance map.
Figure 4 presents the residual tissue off-resonance map, along with a
sample identified cluster at the 300 Hz / 250 mm
3 threshold
setting. The white arrows in the
magnitude image and tissue field indicate a hypointense region in the magnitude
image which is suspected of being a central focus of the metallic debris. A volumetric surface rendering of the implant
region (blue) and the metallosis cluster is also shown. The case presented in Figures 2-4 resulted
in a computed mScore of 21 and had a Fujishiro metallosis histology score of
4/4.
Figure
5 displays mScore vs histology analysis for Fujishiro grades 0 and 4. A
significant difference of mScore was found between the two groups (p<0.025,
Wilcox-Rank-Sum test) . tight clustering
of low mScores, while the Fushishiro 4/4 show a much broader spread of scores,
with a much higher mean.
Discussion
A limitation of the study is the challenge of registering a
small tissue sample from surgery to its precise location on the MRI images,
which is a potential reason for the broad distribution of mScores within the
Fujishiro groups. It is possible that metallosis pockets were detected in the
larger mScore analysis volumes and were not biopsied at revision surgery. In addition, the mScores will inherently show
more variance than the tissue samples due to the more quantitative and
widespread analyses that are feasible using the full MRI dataset. This strong statistical correlation (r=0.55, p=0.035, Spearman
non-parametric) demonstrates that the presented methods offer
a promising potential MRI-based biomarker for metallosis assessment near total
hip arthroplasty.
Acknowledgements
Research reported in this publication was
supported by NIAMS/NIH (R01-AR064840). The content is solely the responsibility
of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the
National Institutes of Health. References
[1]
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
HCUPnet, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov.
Accessed 10 Nov, 2015.
[2] G Labek., M Thaler, and W Janda. Revision rates after total joint replacement
cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. Journal of Bone and
Joint Surgery 93-B(3):293-297,
2011
[3] K. M. Koch, A. C. Brau, W. Chen, and G. E.
Gold. Imaging near metal with a MAVRIC-SEMAC hybrid. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine, 65:71–82, 2011.
[4]K.M. Koch, M. Koff, P. Shah, H.G. Potter, A Mechanism for
Quantifiable MRI-Based Detection of Cobalt-Chromium Particulate Deposits Near
Total Hip Replacements, Proc. ISMRM,
2015, #310
[5] T Liu, I Khalidov , L.
de Rochefort, P Spincemaille, J Liu, A.J. Tsiouris, and Y Wang. A novel
background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields
(PDF). NMR in Biomedicine, 24(9), 1129–1136, 2011