Ioanna Chronaiou1,2, Ruth Stoklund Thomsen 3, Else-Marie Huuse-Røneid 2,3, and Beathe Sitter1
1Department of Radiography, Sør-Trøndelag University College, Trondheim, Norway, 2Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 3St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
Synopsis
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a highly heterogeneous inflammatory disease that manifests with inflammation in sacroiliac (SI) joints and spine among other symptoms. PsA patients (N=12) underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations to assess the extent of SI joint inflammation. A pixel-based morphometric method for accurate quantification of bone marrow inflammatory edema was compared to SPARCC assessment in MR images of psoriatic arthritis patients with low or very low inflammatory activity. A significant correlation was found, suggesting pixel-based morphometry as a reliable and sensitive quantitative method for measuring inflammation in bone marrow. Purpose
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory
joint disease that develops in patients with psoriasis and manifests by highly heterogeneous
clinical symptoms (1). Inflammation in the sacroiliac (SI) joints and spine
are common. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows direct visualization of
inflammation and is the most sensitive imaging modality for assessment of
structures critical in evolution of inflammatory disease. Image scoring
according to the spondyloarthritis research consortium of Canada (SPARCC) (2)
gives a semi-quantitative measure of the manifestation of the disease in SI
joints and spine, which is reliable and sensitive to change, but also labor intensive. This study aims to compare
a pixel-based morphometric method for accurate quantification of bone marrow inflammatory
edema to SPARCC assessment in MR images of SI joints of PsA patients with low
or very low inflammatory activity.
METHODS
Patients diagnosed with PsA were included in the study (N=41). Clinical evaluation, patient global
assessment (PGA), disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28), Bath ankylosing
spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI), quality of life questionnaire, and
high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HS-CRP) provided patient health status.
All patients
underwent
MRI examinations of the
sacroiliac joints and the spine based
on standardized protocols (2, 3). Examinations were performed on two 1.5T scanners (Avanto, Siemens Healthcare, Germany). A T2-weighted sequence with fat suppression (STIR; time to
recovery [TR] 3700 msec, time to echo [TE] 52 msec, time to
inversion 145 msec) and a T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence (TR 423 msec, TE 11 msec) were used for the examination of the
SI joints. Data from the SI joints of 12 patients (ages 24-63 years) have been
analyzed so far. A rheumathologist scored the T2-weighted STIR images,
according to the SPARCC criteria (2).
Pixel-based
morphometric image analysis included manual outlining of the
sacrum and the iliac bones, excluding vascular and neural structures (3D
slicer, MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab). Signal intensity was normalized to
signals from muscle in the same slice (MATLAB, Mathworks). For each set of
images, a circular region of interest (ROI) was placed in the first sacral
vertebra in one slice.
A threshold was
defined as $$$μ+2σ$$$,
where μ is
the mean and σ the standard deviation of signal
intensity in that ROI. All voxels with higher signal
intensity than the threshold, consistent with inflammation (4), were masked (Figure 1). The volume of
subchondral sacroiliac STIR hyperintensity (volumehyper) and the
average signal intensity of subchondral sacroiliac STIR hyperintensity (SIRelHyper)
were calculated for all patients.
RESULTS
The patients have low SPARCC scores, ranging from 0 to
5, with 7 patients having 0 and the maximum possible SPARCC score being 72. Patients
also have low calculated volume
with a mean of 0,13 cm
3,
ranging from 0 to 0,74 cm
3. SI
RelHyper had a mean of 1.07,
ranging from 0 to 5.06. SPARCC scores correlate with statistical significance
with volume
hyper (p<0.001) and SI
RelHyper (p<0.001) (Figure 2). Pixel-based morphometric analysis and
SPARCC agree in 72 out of 77 (93,5%) of the scored slices.
DISCUSSION
MR
image inflammation scoring (SPARCC MRI Index for scoring inflammation) validates
the use of pixel-based morphometry as a way to accurately quantify active bone
marrow inflammatory edema in PsA patients with very low inflammation. In a
previous study (4), this method was used to measure inflammatory changes in the SI joints
of patients with lower back pain. Those patients had larger inflammatory edema
(volumehyper ranging from 0 to 23,1 cm3)
than the patients included in this study (volumehyper
ranging from 0 to 0,74 cm3
).
The
number of patients included in the analysis is relatively small, and analysis
of the remaining data can further validate the use of pixel-based morphometry.
Another limitation is that the sacrum and iliac bone ROIs of the patients were
drawn manually. For further data analysis, automated or semi-automated methods will
be explored.
CONCLUSION
Pixel-based
morphometry correlates well with SPARCC scores. This method allows accurate
quantification of active bone marrow inflammatory edema in PsA patients with
low or very low inflammation. The significant correlation for low inflammatory
scores suggests pixel-based morphometry as a reliable and sensitive quantitative
method for measuring the presence and change of inflammation in bone marrow.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Sankowski AJ, Lebkowska UM, Cwikla J,
Walecka I, Walecki J. The comparison of efficacy of different imaging
techniques (conventional radiography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance) in
assessment of wrist joints and metacarpophalangeal joints in patients with
psoriatic arthritis. Polish Journal of Radiology. 2013;78(1):18-29
2. Maksymowych WP, Inman RD, Salonen D,
Dhillon SS, Krishnananthan R, Stone M, et al. Spondyloarthritis Research
Consortium of Canada magnetic resonance imaging index for assessment of spinal
inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Care & Research.
2005;53(4):502-9
3. Maksymowych WP, Inman RD, Salonen D,
Dhillon SS, Williams M, Stone M, et al. Spondyloarthritis research Consortium
of Canada magnetic resonance imaging index for assessment of sacroiliac joint
inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Care & Research.
2005;53(5):703-9
4. Fritz J, Henes JC, Thomas C, Clasen S,
Fenchel M, Claussen CD, et al. Diagnostic and interventional MRI of the
sacroiliac joints using a 1.5-T open-bore magnet: a one-stop-shopping approach.
AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2008;191(6):1717-24