Koji Sagiyama1, Yuji Watanabe2, Ryotaro Kamei1, Sungtak Hong3, Satoshi Kawanami2, Yoshihiro Matsumoto4, and Hiroshi Honda1
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan, 2Department of Molecular Imaging and Diagnosis, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan, 3Healthcare, Philips Electronics Japan, Fukuoka, Japan, 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Synopsis
A combination of single measurements would be
necessary to improve the efficacy of evaluating the treatment effect in heterogeneous
soft-tissue tumors. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of direct
voxel-by-voxel comparison of SUVs and ADCs with the PET/MR system in the
evaluation of the treatment effect in soft-tissue tumors. The ADCs and SUVs
were recorded on a voxel-by-voxel basis for all slices. The scatter plots clearly
demonstrated significant difference between pre- and post-treatment. Multiparametric
voxel-based analysis of SUVs and ADCs could be a promising tool for evaluating
the treatment effect in soft-tissue tumors.Purpose
The positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance
(PET/MR) system allows fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET and a diffusion-weighted
image (DWI) to be acquired simultaneously with precise image co-registration. Further,
this system enables direct voxel-by-voxel comparison of the standardized uptake
value (SUV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Our previous study showed
that this system performed better diagnostically than a single measurement such
as SUV max or ADC minimum
1. The purpose of the present study was to investigate
the feasibility of the voxel-by-voxel comparisons of SUVs and ADCs in the
evaluation of the treatment effect in soft-tissue tumors.
Methods
Six
patients with high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas (2 osteosarcomas, 2 pleomorphic
sarcomas, 1 synovial sarcoma, and 1 clear cell sarcoma) were included in this
study. Four patients underwent chemotherapy and 2 patients underwent heavy-particle
radiotherapy. The patients were scanned by using the Ingenuity TF PET/MR (Philips
Healthcare, Cleveland, OH) before and after the treatment. After the scout
image and a 3D T1-weighted image for attenuation correction were acquired, the participants
underwent PET imaging with 3D-ordered subset expectation maximization (3D-OSEM)
and time of flight (TOF). The sampling time was 5 minutes per station, and the images
were reconstructed with 23 mm voxels. After PET imaging, a series of
diagnostic MR images were obtained. Transverse 2D fat-suppressed T2-weighted
images (T2WI) and T1WI were obtained by using a turbo-spin echo sequence to
cover the entire tumor volume. A DWI with a spatially selective RF pulse2 (zoomed DWI, b = 0 and 800) was obtained after the anatomical images were acquired,
and an ADC map was generated. Additional diagnostic imaging was provided in the
clinic, as necessary. The total scan time was 50 to 60 min.
The
procedures for image processing are shown in Figure 1. First, image
registration with rigid transformation was performed between the T2WI, ADC map,
and PET image on an IntelliSpace Portal workstation (version 6.0, Philips
Healthcare). The T2WI and PET image were then resliced in accordance with the ADC
map (5 or 6 mm). Subsequent image processing was performed by using Image J
software (version 1.43, NIH, Bethesda, MD). On T2WI, regions of interest (ROIs)
were manually drawn along the border of the tumor in all slices. The ROIs were
then copied onto the ADC maps and PET images. After extracting the tumor area,
in-plane image resolution was interpolated to 42 mm from 22
mm. The ADCs and SUVs were recorded on a voxel-by-voxel basis for all slices,
and scatter plots were generated for each tumor.
The
tumor volume, SUV peak, and ADC minimum were recorded for each tumor as ‘conventional’
measurements. To quantify the heterogeneity of SUV/ADC, the 95% area of
bivariate normal distribution of the 2 parameters was calculated by using our in-house
program and a commercial software package (MATLAB 2015a, MathWorks, Natick,
MA). The reverse correlation between SUV and ADC was also analyzed by using Pearson’s
correlation.
Results and Discussion
A representative case of osteosarcoma before and
after chemotherapy is shown in Figure 2. A remarkable decrease of FDG uptake
was observed, but the change in tumor size was minimal. The significant
difference between pre- and post-treatment is clearly demonstrated in the
scatter plots shown in Figures 3 and 4. A comparison between each measurement for
pre- and post-treatment is shown in Figure 5. The correlation coefficient of the
SUV and ADC significantly increased after treatment in all 6 sarcomas (-0.52 ±
0.15 vs. -0.16 ± 0.18, P < 0.01 by paired t-test). On the other hand, tumor
volume, SUV peak, ADC minimum, and SUV/ADC heterogeneity did not show
significant differences between pre- and post-treatment. These results suggest that
a change in the correlation between the SUV and ADC could be an early indicator
of the treatment effect in soft-tissue sarcoma.
Conclusion
Multiparametric voxel-based analysis of SUVs and
ADCs with a PET/MR system could be a promising tool for the evaluation of the treatment
effect in soft-tissue tumors.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Sagiyama K, Watanabe Y, Kamei R, et al. Voxel-by-voxel analyses of SUVs and
ADCs of soft-tissue tumors with a PET/MR hybrid system: Preliminary results.
RSNA 2015
2.
Sagiyama K, Watanabe Y, Kamei R, et al. Comparison of positron emission
tomography diffusion-weighted imaging (PET/DWI) registration quality in a
PET/MR scanner: Zoomed DWI vs. Conventional DWI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015
(Epub ahead of print)