Synopsis
Despite
many reports of skin burns in the region of tattoos, there are few safety studies
concerning RF heating caused by tattoos. Manufacturers of tattoo ink are numerous
and use a range of dye ingredients, making it difficult to assess the
electromagnetic properties of each ink pigment. An anchor-shaped tattoo was modelled
1mm under the skin layer in the region of the cervical spine to predict a possible
skin burn generated by RF coil. A simulation model of RF heating in tattoo
pigment is proposed, which shows that certain tattoo pigments may lead to
severe skin burns when performing high field MRI.Purpose
In
this study, we investigated the RF heating effects of iron oxide, especially Fe3O4,
using electromagnetic and thermal simulation software.
Introduction
Electromagnetic
simulation of specific absorption rate (SAR) and temperature elevation in subjects
scanned with MRI have been studied for many years, with previous introduction
of a ‘cumulative equivalent minutes at 43°C’ (CEM
43) tissue damage threshold to
ensure MR safety
1. Despite many reports of skin burns in the region of
tattoos, there are few safety studies concerning RF heating caused by tattoos
2-4. Manufacturers of tattoo ink are numerous and all use
a range of dye ingredients, making it difficult to assess the electromagnetic properties
of each specific ink pigment. Nevertheless, the possible cause of a skin burn during
an MR scan has been reported to be related to iron oxide, which is potentially
magnetic and an electrical conductor
3. Iron oxide exists in different chemical states: Fe
3O
4
is a known ingredient of black ink pigment, along with Fe
2O
3
and FeO for red and yellow, respectively
5.
Methods
SEMCAD X (Speag, Switzerland) was used to calculate
SAR, CEM
43 values, and to solve the Arrhenius model for thermal
change. A single loop surface coil was modelled with four equally spaced
capacitors and with a diameter of 100 mm and a width of 10mm. The coil was positioned
5 cm away from the Duke human model
6 with a resolution of (1mm)
3
and tuned for 7 T (S
11 < -25 dB) (Fig. 1). An anchor-shaped tattoo was modelled
1mm under the skin layer in the region of the cervical spine using iSEG (ZMT, Switzerland)
with longitudinal and lateral lengths of 150 mm and 100 mm, respectively. The model
in the region of the tattoo shape was adjusted until a single layer of tattoo
pigment was located 1 mm under the outmost skin layer in the 3D slices. The maximum
local SAR for normal skin was calculated for a standard permitted thermal
simulation input power (10gSAR
max=9.8 W/kg at 43 W input power). The
dielectric properties of black tattoo ink pigment have not been reported, so the
concentration of Fe in black tattoo pigment
7 was used to estimate its dielectric
properties (σ: 1275.2
S/m, ε
r: 74.41 in Fig. 2). The thermal properties of tattoo
ink pigment were assigned from previous studies
8. To estimate the skin burn effect,
the Arrhenius model was used and its parameters for skin were assigned from
literature values
9 (A: 2.2x10
124 1/s, ΔE=187.1 kcal/mol).
Results
RF
heating was calculated during 20 min of simulated surface coil transmission with
43 W input power. Regional temperature elevation was predicted in the bottom of
the tattoo region, especially at its edges (Fig. 3). A CEM
43
simulation was performed and showed that the left side edge of the tattoo was
heated the most (CEM
43=209.8 for 10 min, CEM
43=409.5 for 20
min, respectively, see Fig. 4). It is expected that heating of between 480 and
960 CEM
43 would cause an immediate superficial burn
10. The Arrhenius tissue damage model was calculated to
estimate the potential severity of the skin burn, and showing an increase to 0.3
Ω and 0.51 Ω for 10 min heating and 20 min heating, respectively, in the case of a sharpened anchor shape (Fig. 5).
Conclusions
The RF heating safety of tattoo ink pigment was
investigated. A possible source of skin burn could be caused by a specific form
of iron oxide, Fe
3O
4, which is known to have 10
6
times higher electrical conductivity than Fe
2O
3 due to electron
exchange between the Fe
II and Fe
III centers
11,12. Fe
3O
4 is
also known as CI pigment black 11, which is insoluble in water and may have impurities,
so caution should be used in estimating the dielectric properties of tattoo ink
pigment without direct measurement. RF modelling predicted a possible skin burn in an area
close to the RF coil copper strip, observed as locally generated heating at the
edge of the tattoo shape. For the Arrhenius model, 0.53 Ω is
known equate to a 1
st degree burn, and 1 Ω is reported to equate as
a 2
nd degree burn
13, so more heating could lead to
the subject suffering a severe skin burn. Future studies are needed to evaluate
different tattoo pigment shapes and more realistic dielectric properties of the
ingredients. In summary, a simulation model of RF heating in tattoo pigment is proposed,
which shows that certain tattoo pigments may lead to severe skin burns when
performing high field MRI.
Acknowledgements
Oxford-Radcliffe Graduate Scholarship (University
College Oxford) and Clarendon Fund.References
1.Murbach M, Neufeld E, Pruessmann KP, Kuster N. Safe MR scan times based on CEM43 tissue damage thresholds, using electromagnetic and thermal simulations with anatomically correct human models and considering local thermoregulation. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med . 2012.
2.Kreidstein M, Giguere D, Freiberg A. Case Report: MRI Interaction with Tattoo Pigments: Case Report, Pathophysiology, and Management.; 1995.
3.Wagle W, Smith M. Tattoo-Induced Skin Burn During MR Imaging. 2000.
4.Aissani S, Missoffe A, Pasquier C, Felblinger J. Tattoo (decorative or cosmetic) in MRI: a numerical simulation of the interface between the tattoo and the radio frequency magnetic field. ESMRMB.; 2015.
5.Serup J, Kluger N, Baumler W. Tattooed Skin and Health.; 2015.
6.Christ A, Kainz W, Hahn EG, et al. The Virtual Family—development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:23-38.
7.Morales-Callaghan AM, Aguilar-Bernier M, Martínez-García G, Miranda-Romero A, Valladolid S. Sarcoid granuloma on black tattoo. J Am Acd Dermatol. 2006;55(5).
8.Humphries A, Lister TS, Wright PA, Hughes MP. Determination of the thermal and physical properties of black tattoo ink using compound analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2013.
9.He X, John B. Quantification of Temperature and Injury Response in Thermal Therapy and Cryosurgery. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2003;31(5-6):355-422.
10.Yarmolenko PS, Moon EJ, Landon C, et al. Thresholds for thermal damage to normal tissues: An update. Int J Hyperth. 2013;27(4).
11.Ross J, Matava M. Case report: Tattoo-Induced Skin “Burn” During Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Professional Football Player. Sports Health. 2011;3(5):431-434.
12.Greenwood N, Earnshaw A. Chemistry of the Elements. 2nd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997.
13.Van De Sompel D, Kong TY, Ventikos Y. Modelling of experimentally created partial-thickness human skin burns and subsequent therapeutic cooling: A new measure for cooling effectiveness. Med Eng Phys. 2009;31:624-631.
14. Hasgall PA, Di Gennaro F, Baumgartner C, Neufeld E, Gosselin MC, Payne D, Klingenböck A, Kuster N, “IT’IS Database for thermal and electromagnetic parameters of biological tissues,” Version 3.0, September 01st, 2015.
15.Qaddoumi N, Handjojo L, Bigelow T, Easter J, Bray A, Zoughi R. Microwave corrosion detection using open-ended rectangular waveguide sensors. Mater Eval. 2000;58(2):178-184.
16.Yang T-I, Brown RNC, Kempel LC, Kofinas P. Magneto-dielectric properties of polymer– Fe3O4 nanocomposites. J Magn Magn Mater. 2008;320:2714-2720.
17.Tsuda N, Nasu K, Fujimori A, Siratori K. Electronic Conductivity in Oxide. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2000.