Parnian Zarghamravanbakhsh1, John M Pauly1, and Greig Scott1
1Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
Synopsis
The radiofrequency (RF) transmit field can induce
current in implanted devices; therefore, it is essential to detect
and minimize coupling to stimulator leads and guide-wire structures. Reverse
polarization has been proposed as low-RF-power method to safely detect current
in the implanted devices using birdcage coil. The purpose of this study is to
demonstrate feasibility of combining knowledge of coil current and location
with reverse polarization method using parallel transmit array to detect and
localize implanted wires. Introduction
A key
goal in RF safety in MRI is to identify and minimize coupling to stimulator
leads and guide-wire structures. The reverse polarization method has been introduced
as a low power method to visualize implanted wires
1. Moreover, the contrast
of a reverse polarized signal can be improved by using pre-spoiler gradients
2.
Conceptually, wire structures act as polarization transformers through
generation of linear polarized scattering fields. Reverse polarization was
originally intended for birdcage coils, which produce approximately uniform RF
fields. In contrast, multichannel transmitters have non-uniform transmit sensitivities, and obtaining ideal forward or reverse polarization is a challenging issue. Prior
knowledge of B
1+ maps is required to determine complex weights of each
transmit element to synthesize forward or reverse transmission in any volume of
interest. In this study, we propose transmit coil locators
3,4 and RF coil
current sensing
5 to enable reverse polarized transmission synthesis for
transceiver arrays, and demonstrate localization of coupled structures inside
the excitation volume.
Methods
The study was performed on GE 1.5 T scanner with a
cylindrical four-channel transmit/receive
array controlled by a 4-ch Medusa console. Each coil had an RF current sensor
to measure circulating currents. Each sensor modulated a high speed LED that
was coupled to plastic optical fiber, and demodulated by photonic
receivers. Furthermore, bidirectional
couplers sensed forward and reverse power on each channel. A switch matrix
selected one of current, forward V or reverse V on each channel for digitization during
transmit. Three fluorine fiducial
markers were placed on conductor edges of one of the coils to localize the
transmit array3, and then the simulated relative complex B1+ maps for each coil
was estimated using FDTD-based analysis as part of our previously proposed method4. The B1+ estimates
determined the relative complex weights
for each transmit channel to obtain forward or reverse polarized transmit
fields in the selected volume of interest.Next, the transmit array system was calibrated to ensure the calculated
voltages were applied to each transmit coil using a two-part process: 1) Making a
lookup-table for correcting amplitude and phase non-linearity of each amplifier
using forward power data measured by bidirectional couplers.
2) Calculating the transmit coil decoupling matrix using current sensor 6 .
All experiments were performed on a saline phantom
containing an insulated wire. Projection imaging was performed using a GRE
sequence with non-selective slice gradient. Separate images were acquired for
forward and reverse polarized transmit fields. The reverse polarization
experiment was also tested with pre-spoiler gradients to further suppress the
background signal near the wire. Moreover, taking advantage of the high spatial
frequency in the unspoiled reverse polarization image, a Canny edge detection
filter was applied to this image in MATLAB to detect and localize the wire
within the excitation volume.
Results
Figure 1 shows sagittal projection
images of the wire phantom for forward, unspoiled reverse, and spoiled reverse
transmit mode. As is shown in Figure 1b, the unspoiled reverse polarized transmit
mode reduces background signal in selected regions near the wire. Using a
gradient pre-spoiler with the reversed polarization further reduces background
signal, and the wire signal is clearly distinguished in Figure 1c. Figure 2 shows sagittal and coronal
projection images of the wire phantom along with the edge detection images. The
location of the wire within the excitation volume is completely detected in the
edge images (Figure 2c and d).
Discussion and Conclusion
In this work, the feasibility of
extending forward and reverse polarization to transceiver array localization
and detection of implanted wires is demonstrated. Complete coil locators and
sensors are essential for rapid synthesis of the reverse polarized array
modes. Pre-spoiler gradients combined
with reverse polarization can significantly suppress the background signal even
more. Edge detection filters can then extract a wire-line model from each
projection to form a 3 dimensional model. This opens the possibility for
automated computer detection, and the next stage of quantifying the level of
coupling at specific wire locations, with the ultimate goal to then minimize
general RF coupling by transmit array null-mode imaging
7.
Acknowledgements
Grant support: R01EB019241,
R01EB008108, P01CA159992, NIH T32 HL007846, and GE research supportReferences
1. Overall WR, Pauly JM, Stang PP, Scott GC. Ensuring safety
of implanted devices under MRI using reversed RF polarization. Magn Reson Med
2010;64:823–833.
2. Overall WR, Stang PP, Pauly JM, Scott GC.
Safely
Detecting Device Coupling using Reversed RF Polarization and Pre-Spoiled EPI. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual
Meeting of ISMRM, Stockholm, Sweden, 2010. p. 775.
3. Zarghamravanbakhsh P, Ellenor C, Pauly
J, Scott G. Toward mapping
using coil locators. In
Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Milan, Italy, 2014. p.1457.
4. Zarghamravanbakhsh P,
Pauly J, Scott G. Fast 3D Algorithm for
Coil Localization as an Aid in
Estimation of Distribution.
In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of ISMRM,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2015. p. 2378.
5. Stang P, Zanchi M, Grissom W, Kerr A, Pauly J, Scott G. RF
sensor considerations for input predistortion correction of transmit arrays. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Stockholm,
Sweden, 2010. p. 44.
6. Scott GC, Stang P,
Overall W, Kerr A, Pauly J. General
Signal Vector Decoupling for Transmit Arrays. In
Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,
2008. p. 146.
7. Etezadi-Amoli M, Stang P, Kerr A, Pauly J, Scott G. Controlling
radiofrequency-induced currents in guidewires using parallel transmit. Magn Reson Med 2014.