STEREO-MC for Connected Spatiotemporal Excitation
Mohan Lal Jayatilake1, Christoph Juchem 2, Michael Mullen1, Gregor Adriany1, Robin de Graaf2, and Michael Garwood1

1Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, MN, United States, 2Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States

Synopsis

A highly uniform magnetic field (B0) is typically required to generate MR images. In the original STEREO (for STEering REsonance over the Object) method, spatial variations in B0 are compensated by adjusting pulse amplitudes and frequencies in a temporal manner. Here we present a novel design of a limited set of well-defined multi-coil (MC) arrays that can optimize magnetic field distortions across the object of interest.

Introduction

Standard approaches to generating MR images require a highly uniform magnetic field (B0) and thus necessitate the use of magnets that are physically large relative to the object to be imaged, leading to the high cost of magnet construction and siting. Previously we proposed an approach called STEREO (for STEering REsonance over the Object) as a means to generate images using magnets with drastically reduced B0 uniformity [1]. Unlike standard Fourier imaging techniques, STEREO exploits full spatiotemporal encoding, and images are reconstructed by a non-standard approach (e.g., by solving the inverse problem). In the original STEREO method, spatial variations in B0 and radiofrequency field (B1) are compensated by adjusting pulse amplitudes and frequencies in a temporal manner. In the present study, we investigated whether it is possible to use the dynamic multi-coil technique (DYNAMITE) [2] as a means to create spatiotemporal excitation for STEREO. We aimed to design a limited set of well-defined MC arrays able to strongly reduce the magnetic field distortions across the object of interest

Materials and Methods

After selection of center positions (x0C, y0C, z0C) of the current carrying circular coils on the cylindrical surface (Fig 1), the z-component of the magnetic field generated by the circular coils (BZ) per unit current was then derived analytically by use of the Biot-Savart law, which is adopted from Juchem’s work [3].

$$B_{Z}(x,y,z)= \frac{\mu_0.n}{2\pi}.\sum_c\left(\frac{(y-y_{0C})}{\sqrt{((x-x_{0C})^2 + (z-z_{0C})^2 )[(r + \sqrt{(x-x_{0C})^2 + (z-z_{0C})^2})^2 +(y - y_{0C})^2)}} \right)$$

$$\times \left((-K(\kappa^2) +\frac{(r^2 + (x-x_{0C})^2 + (y-y_{0C})^2 + (z-z_{0C})^2)}{[(r - \sqrt{(x-x_{0C})^2 + (z-z_{0C})^2})^2 +(y - y_{0C})^2)]}.E(\kappa^2)\right)$$ (1)

Here μ0 is the magnetic field constant, n is the number of turns, r is the radius of the coil, c is the coil number, and x, y, and z are the Cartesian coordinates describing three-dimensional space [4]. K(κ2) and E(κ2) refer to the complete elliptical integrals of the first and second kind, respectively. Equivalent values in Hertz were derived using the Larmor equation for protons (1H). A simulated, uncorrected magnetic induction field, ΔHZ, was generated within the 256x256x256mm FOV and 64x64x64 matrix. Assuming constant coil currents, ΔHZ was then projected into the magnetic field basis, BZ, to obtain the corresponding current values, IC, in each individual coil to compensate ΔHZ, within a spherical region of interest (ROI) with a 10-mm radius. The estimation of IC (see Eq.(2)) was based on the Least-squares fitting based on the Levenberg-Marquardt method. The current values in each coil is,

$$I_{C} = [B_{Z}(x,y,z)^{T}. B_{Z}(x,y,z)]^{-1}. B_{Z}(x,y,z)^{T}. \triangle H_{Z}(x,y,z)$$ (2)

The compensation of field homogeneity was extended by moving a ROI along the spiral trajectory (Fig 2A), in clock-wise direction at 4000 different time points during the period of 16 ms in synchrony with traversing shimmed region. A uniform B1 pulse of 5.9 μT was introduced simultaneously with modulated coil currents for duration of 16 ms. The Bloch equations were carried out to predict the spatiotemporal excitation profile of the B1 pulse. The maximum transverse magnetization (Figure 2B) and maximum flip angle were evaluated during the whole B1 pulse for each pixel. Further, by introducing a linearly varying B1 pulse (Figure 2D), the Bloch simulations were carried out to evaluate the maximum transverse magnetization, MXY (Figure 2C) [5]. Potential relaxation effects were not considered in the simulations.

Results

Fig 2(A) shows selected spherical ROIs along the spiral trajectory. Fig 2(B) illustrates the maximum MXY produced in the 64x64 matrix in the presence of a uniform 5.9 uT B1 field. It can be seen that uniform excitation along the traversed spiral trajectory is achieved. Above a threshold B1 amplitude, the method is insensitive to B1 field inhomogeneity, as demonstrated in Fig 2(C) which shows the MXY produced by the linearly varying B1 shown in Fig2(D).

Discussion

In this work, simulations have provided proof-of-concept for a unique way of exciting spins uniformly by dynamically driving the coil currents in a multi-coil array with DYNAMITE while applying RF irradiation. The next step will involve experimental validation of this spatiotemporal excitation as a means to accomplish MR imaging in extreme field inhomogeneity.

Acknowledgements

NIH grant R24 MH105998.

References

[1] Snyder et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 72,49–58 (2014).; [2] Juchem et al., J Magn Reson.204:281-9 (2010).; [3] Juchem et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 63,171–180 (2010).; [4] Schill et al., IEEE Trans Magn; 39:961–967 (2003).; [5] Jang et al., Magn. Reson. Med. (2015).

Figures

Figure 1. Multi-coil shim setup. A total of 24 coils (in red) were arranged in four rows with six coils each on a cylindrical surface (radius 112 mm). The coil optimization revealed optimum radii of 30.6 mm, with 100 turns. The optimum wire radius was 0.2 mm.

Figure 2. (A) Motion of a spherical ROI on a spiral trajectory. (B) The maximum MXY produce during the presence of (B) uniform and (C) linearly varying B1 field distribution. (D) The linearly varying B1 field used for the simulation in C.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2198