Comparison of ECG and Novel Ultrasound Triggering with Spatially Resolved MR-compatible Doppler for Cardio-vascular MRI.
Lindsey Alexandra Crowe1, Gibran Manasseh1, Aneta Chmielewski2, Thomas de Perrot1, Hajo Müller3, Rares Salomir1, and Jean-Paul Vallée1

1Division of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland, 2University of Toronto, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Division of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Synopsis

A new cardiac MRI triggering method is sought for cases of ECG signal complications due to pathology, or for fetal imaging. We propose feasibility of triggering to carotid ultrasound using an MRI compatible probe using spatially resolved Doppler compared to gold standard ECG. Retrospective processing using Metric Optimized Gating (MOG), is also included for comparison. Imaging modalities were compatible and the positioning of the US probe stable and patient friendly. Phase contrast flow and cine images were successfully obtained in healthy volunteers with ECG, Doppler triggering and MOG. Image quality is highly comparable and accurate functional parameters accessible.

Background

Functional cardiac MRI scans use ECG signals for triggering acquisition but at higher fields and with demands from, e.g., fetal imaging, new triggering methods are sought1. We propose feasibility of triggering to carotid ultrasound using an MRI compatible probe, moving towards full ultrasound-controlled hybrid cardiovascular MRI, using directly the mechanical flow signal or tissue displacement, instead of electrical stimulation. Unlike previous studies2,3 we used spatially-resolved Doppler imaging. Retrospective processing using Metric Optimized Gating (MOG)4-6, is included for comparison.

Methods

ECG (gold-standard), Doppler and MOG triggering were compared in 5 healthy volunteers (age 26±5years, weight 75±11kg, 3 female 2 male). The 3T MRI protocol consisted of 2- and 4-chamber (2C, 4C) and short axis (SA) cines (TE/TR 1.4/39.2ms, resolution 1.63x1.63x6mm, retrospective gating, 25 phases) and aortic phase contrast (PC) flow (TE/TR 2.5/37.1ms, resolution 1.98x1.98x6mm, retrospective gating, 30 phases). Typical breath-hold duration was 9RR for cine and 24 for PC flow.

Intraoperatory real-time US imaging was performed simultaneously using an MRI compatible transducer (128 element, bandwidth 5-10MHz, pitch 0.15mm, frame rate 20-30fps, shielded external casing dimension 2x3.5cm) designed to minimize susceptibility artifact, RF- and gradient-switching interferences. Pulse-colour Doppler was analysed by an external computer, generating a trigger from a time adaptive threshold of cumulative signal inside a user-defined ROI ensuring robustness to motion. The transducer was positioned in bore using an Innomotion robotized arm or elastic belt, targeting the left common carotid artery. Figure 1 illustrates the US set up and images obtained.

‘Fake trigger’ images used simulated RR 20-30% longer than reality to compare as a poorly gated image and for correction using the MOG (retrospectively corrected k-space).

Images were assessed for quality and functional parameters. Edge gradient sharpness was quantified on septal regions throughout the cycle on Modulus/Laplacian/Median image transforms. Time-resolved flow curves were cross-compared between triggering methods. Left ventricular (LV) volume, ejection volume and flow velocity were calculated using semi-automatic segmentation and manual adjustment (Osirix).

Results

MR imaging was completely free of any potential interferences generated by US. Detectable but non-significant artifacts were observed on colour Doppler during MR acquisition but signal conversion was optimized to be unaffected. Maintaining placement of the probe was successful and ‘patient-friendly’ in all cases.

Figure 2a shows 4C and SA cine frames showing image quality. High-resolution cine was also possible and is shown along with normal resolution for Doppler- and ECG-triggered (figure 2b).

Figure 3a shows Modulus/Laplacian/Median filtered images. Quantification of the septum for SA and 4C for 5 subjects showed 5 cases had no significant difference ECG:Doppler (0.339<p<1), 3 with Doppler better (0<p<0.0015) and 2 with ECG better (0<p<0.005).

Plotting LV surface over the cycle (SA and 4C) gave no difference between ECG and Doppler (figure 3b). Fake-trigger gave incorrect function and MOG succeeded in recuperating LV quantification. Mean difference between surfaces derived from the different triggered acquisitions (all subjects and phases) was 1.67 ECG:Doppler, 3.73 Fake:ECG and 3.28 Fake:Doppler with ICC>0.85 for ECG, Doppler and MOG.

Ejection volumes (4C, figure 3c) were not different between methods, but showed larger dispersion for Fake (in 2 cases Fake images not significantly degraded). ECG and Doppler were significantly different to Fake (p<0.04 without uncompromised Fake).

ECG and Doppler triggered flow showed a higher peak velocity than Fake triggered images and in some cases fake showed several peaks per cycle (figure 4a). The normalised peak flow in the ascending and descending aorta was not different between ECG and Doppler (p=0.475). The time displacement showed, for example, Doppler trigger 600ms later than ECG in an RR of 900ms.

Discussion

Doppler triggering is based on hydrodynamic phenomena, which are related to the PC flow-encoding mechanism unlike cardiac electrical stimulation.

We observe directly major arteries (common carotid) with similar functional properties to the aorta, not small peripheral vessels with different properties used for PPU.

Cross correlation between velocity measurements by US Doppler and PC MR become feasible under conditions of sufficient acoustic window to the respective blood vessel.

Our method does not require direct US imaging of the heart itself which is a complicated acoustic problem inside a closed bore MRI.

Conclusions

PC flow and cine images were successfully obtained in healthy volunteers with ECG-, Doppler- triggering and MOG. Image quality is highly comparable and accurate functional parameters accessible. Quantitative images are obtained in the absence of an ECG signal with Doppler fast enough to trigger cardiac function images.

The hardware platform is designed to further enable advanced cardiac imaging using real-time slice tracking locking imaging planes to respiratory and/or cardiac motion under free breathing, allowing increased patient comfort and longer scantimes.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1Feinberg DA, Giese D, Bongers DA, Ramanna S, Zaitsev M, Markl M, Günther M. Hybrid ultrasound MRI for improved cardiac imaging and real-time respiration control. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010;63:290–296.

2Günther M, Feinberg DA. Ultrasound-guided MRI: preliminary results using a motion phantom. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004;52:27–32.

3de Senneville BD, Regard Y, Moonen CTW, Ries M. Combined ultrasound echography and magnetic resonance imaging guidance for direct and indirect target tracking. In: 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). ; 2014. pp. 1176–1179.

4Jansz MS, Seed M, van Amerom JFP, Wong D, Grosse-Wortmann L, Yoo S-J, Macgowan CK. Metric optimized gating for fetal cardiac MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010;64:1304–1314.

5Roy CW, Seed M, van Amerom JFP, Al Nafisi B, Grosse-Wortmann L, Yoo S-J, Macgowan CK. Dynamic imaging of the fetal heart using metric optimized gating. Magn. Reson. Med. 2013;70:1598–1607.

6Seed M, van Amerom JFP, Yoo S-J, Al Nafisi B, Grosse-Wortmann L, Jaeggi E, Jansz MS, Macgowan CK. Feasibility of quantification of the distribution of blood flow in the normal human fetal circulation using CMR: a cross-sectional study. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. Off. J. Soc. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2012;14:79.

Figures

Figure 1. Ultrasound probe and robot setup and Illustration of colour pulsed Doppler image and time resolved curve of Doppler signal in the common left carotid artery, as used to generate the triggers signals instead of classic ECG triggering during breath-hold cine acquisition.

Figure 2.

(A) Breathhold 4-chamber and short axis MRI images of the heart (single frame from 25/RR). Doppler-, ECG-, Fake- trigger and MOG. Septum blurring evident under poor gating and comparable sharpness in other methods.

(B) Normal (1.63x1.63mm) and High resolution (0.97x0.97mm) Doppler- and ECG- triggered.


Figure 3. a. Median and Laplacian transformation of images showing edge sharpness with tones cyan->yellow->red. b. 4C and SA area example for ECG (blue), Doppler (red), Fake (green) triggering and MOG reconstruction (orange). Fake RR up to 30% > real. c. Box plot of ejection volume from each trigger method.

Figure 4. Flow profiles in ascending and descending aorta. (A) Example of equivalent ECG and MOG and a lower peak flow even when the Fake signal is not artifacted. (B) Example where Fake is poor, ECG=DOP and MOG recovers single peak in cycle.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2190