Synopsis
A new cardiac MRI triggering method is
sought for cases of ECG signal complications due to pathology, or for fetal imaging.
We propose feasibility of triggering to carotid ultrasound using an MRI
compatible probe using spatially resolved Doppler compared to gold standard
ECG. Retrospective processing using Metric Optimized Gating (MOG), is also
included for comparison. Imaging modalities were compatible and the positioning
of the US probe stable and patient friendly. Phase contrast flow
and cine images were successfully obtained in healthy volunteers with ECG,
Doppler triggering and MOG. Image
quality is highly comparable and accurate functional parameters accessible.Background
Functional cardiac MRI scans use ECG signals for
triggering acquisition but at higher fields and with demands from, e.g., fetal
imaging, new triggering methods are sought
1. We propose feasibility of triggering to
carotid ultrasound using an MRI compatible probe, moving towards full
ultrasound-controlled hybrid cardiovascular MRI, using directly the mechanical flow
signal or tissue displacement, instead of electrical stimulation. Unlike previous studies
2,3 we used
spatially-resolved Doppler imaging. Retrospective processing using Metric
Optimized Gating (MOG)
4-6, is included for comparison.
Methods
ECG (gold-standard), Doppler and MOG triggering were
compared in 5 healthy volunteers (age 26±5years, weight 75±11kg, 3 female 2 male). The 3T MRI
protocol consisted of 2- and 4-chamber (2C, 4C) and short axis (SA) cines
(TE/TR 1.4/39.2ms, resolution 1.63x1.63x6mm, retrospective gating, 25 phases)
and aortic phase contrast (PC) flow (TE/TR 2.5/37.1ms, resolution
1.98x1.98x6mm, retrospective gating, 30 phases). Typical breath-hold duration was
9RR for cine and 24 for PC flow.
Intraoperatory real-time US imaging was performed
simultaneously using an MRI compatible transducer (128 element, bandwidth 5-10MHz, pitch
0.15mm, frame rate 20-30fps, shielded external casing dimension 2x3.5cm) designed
to minimize susceptibility artifact, RF- and gradient-switching interferences. Pulse-colour Doppler was analysed by an external computer, generating a trigger from a
time adaptive threshold of cumulative signal inside a user-defined ROI ensuring
robustness to motion. The transducer was positioned in bore using an Innomotion
robotized arm or elastic belt, targeting the left common carotid artery. Figure
1 illustrates the US set up and images obtained.
‘Fake trigger’ images used simulated RR 20-30% longer
than reality to compare as a poorly gated image and for correction using the
MOG (retrospectively corrected k-space).
Images were assessed for quality and functional
parameters. Edge gradient sharpness was quantified on septal regions throughout
the cycle on Modulus/Laplacian/Median image transforms. Time-resolved flow
curves were cross-compared between triggering methods. Left ventricular (LV) volume, ejection volume
and flow velocity were calculated using semi-automatic segmentation and manual
adjustment (Osirix).
Results
MR imaging was completely
free of any potential interferences generated by US. Detectable but non-significant
artifacts were observed on colour Doppler during MR acquisition but signal
conversion was optimized to be unaffected. Maintaining placement of the probe
was successful and ‘patient-friendly’ in all cases.
Figure 2a shows 4C
and SA cine frames showing image quality. High-resolution cine was also
possible and is shown along with normal resolution for Doppler- and ECG-triggered
(figure 2b).
Figure 3a shows Modulus/Laplacian/Median
filtered images. Quantification of the septum for SA and 4C for 5 subjects
showed 5 cases had no significant difference ECG:Doppler (0.339<p<1), 3
with Doppler better (0<p<0.0015) and 2 with ECG better (0<p<0.005).
Plotting LV surface
over the cycle (SA and 4C) gave no difference between ECG and Doppler (figure
3b). Fake-trigger gave incorrect function and MOG succeeded in recuperating LV quantification.
Mean difference between surfaces derived from the different triggered
acquisitions (all subjects and phases) was 1.67 ECG:Doppler, 3.73 Fake:ECG and 3.28
Fake:Doppler with ICC>0.85 for ECG, Doppler and MOG.
Ejection volumes (4C,
figure 3c) were not different between methods, but showed larger dispersion for
Fake (in 2 cases Fake images not significantly degraded). ECG and Doppler were
significantly different to Fake (p<0.04 without uncompromised Fake).
ECG and Doppler
triggered flow showed a higher peak velocity than Fake triggered images and in
some cases fake showed several peaks per cycle (figure 4a). The normalised peak
flow in the ascending and descending aorta was not different between ECG and
Doppler (p=0.475). The time displacement showed, for example, Doppler trigger 600ms
later than ECG in an RR of 900ms.
Discussion
Doppler triggering is based on
hydrodynamic phenomena, which are related to the PC flow-encoding mechanism unlike
cardiac electrical stimulation.
We observe directly major arteries (common
carotid) with similar functional properties to the aorta, not small peripheral
vessels with different properties used for PPU.
Cross correlation between velocity
measurements by US Doppler and PC MR become feasible under conditions of
sufficient acoustic window to the respective blood vessel.
Our method does not require direct US
imaging of the heart itself which is a complicated acoustic problem inside a
closed bore MRI.
Conclusions
PC flow and cine images were successfully
obtained in healthy volunteers with ECG-, Doppler- triggering and MOG. Image quality is highly comparable and
accurate functional parameters accessible. Quantitative images are obtained in
the absence of an ECG signal with Doppler fast enough to trigger cardiac
function images.
The hardware platform is designed to further
enable advanced cardiac imaging using real-time slice tracking locking imaging
planes to respiratory and/or cardiac motion under free breathing, allowing
increased patient comfort and longer scantimes.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1Feinberg DA, Giese D, Bongers DA, Ramanna S, Zaitsev M, Markl M, Günther
M. Hybrid ultrasound MRI for improved cardiac imaging and real-time respiration
control. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010;63:290–296.
2Günther M, Feinberg DA. Ultrasound-guided MRI: preliminary results using
a motion phantom. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004;52:27–32.
3de Senneville BD, Regard Y, Moonen CTW, Ries M. Combined ultrasound
echography and magnetic resonance imaging guidance for direct and indirect
target tracking. In: 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical
Imaging (ISBI). ; 2014. pp. 1176–1179.
4Jansz MS, Seed M, van Amerom JFP, Wong D, Grosse-Wortmann L, Yoo S-J,
Macgowan CK. Metric optimized gating for fetal cardiac MRI. Magn. Reson. Med.
2010;64:1304–1314.
5Roy CW, Seed M, van Amerom JFP, Al Nafisi B, Grosse-Wortmann L, Yoo S-J,
Macgowan CK. Dynamic imaging of the fetal heart using metric optimized gating.
Magn. Reson. Med. 2013;70:1598–1607.
6Seed M, van Amerom JFP, Yoo S-J, Al Nafisi B, Grosse-Wortmann L, Jaeggi
E, Jansz MS, Macgowan CK. Feasibility of quantification of the distribution of
blood flow in the normal human fetal circulation using CMR: a cross-sectional
study. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. Off. J. Soc. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.
2012;14:79.