J. Rock Hadley1, Emilee Minalga1, and Dennis L. Parker1
1Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Synopsis
This
work tests how much loop conductivity and SNR is improved with copper plating
of the silver ink trace. Coils made with
a silver ink base and different amounts of copper plating were compared against
solid copper. This work demonstrates that copper plating of silver ink coils is
possible and it indicates that significant improvements in coil trace
conductivity can be achieved.
Consequently, the SNR performance of silver ink coils that have been
plated with copper improves over silver ink coils without plating.Purpose
Achieving
maximum Signal-to-Noise Ratio with a radio frequency MRI coil depends highly on
the geometry and position of the coil with respect to the imaging volume of
interest. Although the greatest SNR is
achieved when the coil is form fitting and close to the surface of the imaging
volume, some shapes may be difficult to fit.
One technique to expand the types and shapes of surfaces on which coils
can be constructed is the use of conductive silver ink for creating the coil
traces [1-5]. However, despite the high
conductivity of silver itself, silver ink coils have reduced conductivity. We hypothesize that loop conductivity can be
increased while retaining the ability to build coils on unconventional surfaces
by copper plating the silver ink trace once it has been created on a surface. If so, then these coils may be constructed
while maintaining similar coil performance as standard wire or foil trace
coils. Copper plating of ink traces does
have the potential of reducing the flexibility of the silver ink trace. This work tests how much loop conductivity and
SNR is improved with copper plating of the silver ink coil trace. Future work will address the effects of
copper plating on the loop flexibility.
Methods
Six coils were evaluated in this work (coils A-F), as shown
in Figure 1, with all imaging done on a Siemens Tim Trio 3T MRI Scanner. All coils were constructed on fiberglass
formers as 52/62 mm inner/outer diameter coils with a single gap. The
comparison standard (Coil-A, see Table1 for characteristics) was solid copper. Coils B and C were thick and thin silver ink traces (Creative
Materials Inc., 120-07), respectively, without plating. Coils D-F were thin silver ink traces that
were copper plated for 5, 10 and 15 minutes, respectively. All loops were
coated with varnish to keep the thin copper layers from oxidizing. 18-gauge tinned-copper wire leads and a
tune/match circuit were positioned at the gap (Figure 1). Leads were connected to Coil-A with solder
and with silver ink for all other loops. Silver ink traces were cured at 150° C for 5 minutes.
Electrode copper plating was performed for coils D-F after an acid wash at 0.5 volts.
The DC resistance was measured for each loop before circuitry was added. Each loop was tuned and matched at 123 MHz
with an insertion loss better than -35 dB.
Active and preamp detuning were better than -35 dB and -20 dB,
respectively. SNR measurements were made
using standard GRE sequences (TR/TE/flip/FOV =500ms/4ms/90°/280mm, 128x128
matrix). SNR plots were constructed by
averaging 5 image pixels through the axis of the coil, over 5 different scans
for each coil.
Results
Results from this study show that the silver ink used can be
electroplated with copper and, although the plating only occurs on one side of
the silver trace, the electrical conductivity of the loop does increase. Silver
ink thickness, plated copper thickness and DC resistance measurements are
presented in Table 1. In addition, Table
1 shows example relative SNR measurements from ROIs near the coil. Figure 2 shows the relative SNR results for
the 6-coil comparison. As expected,
these plots show the significant difference in SNR between the solid copper
loop and the ink loops. They also demonstrate
how conductivity is increased with copper plating. Results for Coil-E were not
expected since its copper thickness would indicate a resulting SNR between
those of Coil-D and Coil-F. Although
every effort was made to keep the coil tune and match properties consistent,
the loops were very sensitive and there may have been some unresolved problem
with the silver ink wire attachments for Coil-E during the SNR measurements.
Discussion
This technique worked well for the fiberglass substrate used
in this study. For this process to work,
the substrate is required to withstand the >120° C ink curing temperature as
well as the acidic, turbulent-bath electroplating process. Uniformity of the plated copper thickness was
highly dependent on the anode/cathode geometry within the plating bath. Copper oxidized quickly at these thicknesses
and measures need to be taken to prevent this process quickly after plating. Future
work will investigate plating on flexible substrates and determine how much
copper can be plated on the ink while maintaining complete substrate
flexibility.
Conclusions
This work demonstrates that copper plating of silver ink
coils is possible and it indicates that significant improvements in coil trace
conductivity can be achieved.
Consequently, the SNR performance of silver ink coils that have been
plated with copper improves over silver ink coils without plating.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH/NCI 5
R03CA195453-02. We give
special thanks to Ron and Chris Chamberlain at Circuit Graphics, Inc. of Salt
Lake City, Utah for their expertise and insights with silver ink coating and
copper plating.References
1. D Mager
et al., IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 29(2):482-7, Feb. 2010.
2. BP
Lechene et al., 23rd ISMRM, Toronto, Canada,
3. JR
Corea et al., 22nd ISMRM, Milan, Italy, May, 2014.
4. JR
Corea et al., 21st ISMRM, Salt Lake City, Utah, April, 2013.
5. JR
Corea et al., 20th ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, May, 2012.