Zidan Yu1,2, Bei Zhang1, Jerzy Walczyk1, Gang Chen1,2, and Graham Wiggins1
1The Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2The Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
The cervical spine presents a challenging target for 7T RF coils. In
this work, we describe a 6 channel transmit-receive cervical spine coil
constructed like a cervical collar, wrapping around the back of the neck.
In-vivo experiments demonstrate higher transmit efficiency, better B1+ uniformity in the transverse plane and equivalent SNR compared to a RAPID
Biomedical cervical spine coil.Introduction
The cervical spine presents a challenging target
for 7T RF coils. Previous designs have used transmit elements primarily to the
posterior of the neck [1,2], or have wrapped elements all the way around the
neck [3]. Previous simulations by one of us have shown that by transmitting with
only 6 out of 8 elements of a wrap around array a relatively uniform excitation
can be achieved in the posterior-most 3/4 of a neck sized phantom [4]. We
present here a 6 channel transmit-receive cervical spine coil constructed like
a cervical collar, wrapping around the back of the neck. Phantom and in vivo
data are presented, and the coil is compared to a commercially available 7T 4-channel cervical spine coil
(RAPID Biomedical. Rimpar, Germany)
Methods
The 6-channel array was etched on pyralux flexible
circuit board. The dimension of each element was about 7cm × 7cm. Each element
incorporates 5 fixed and one trimmer capacitor (Fig 1a). Neighboring elements
were capacitively decoupled. On each element, a lattice balun was designed for
impedance match, with a cable trap on each cable to minimize common mode
currents (Fig.1b). Preamp
decoupling was achieved by adjusting the coax cable length. The coil was covered
with foam and can be wrapped
on the patient’s neck like a cervical collar (Fig. 2). There is a gap between coils
1 and 6 which is bridged with a Velcro strap. A minimum distance of 1 cm between
the coil surface and the patient was maintained by a layer of foam for
safety.
The coil was interfaced to a 7T scanner with 8
channel parallel transmit (Siemens, Erlangen Germany) using an in-house built
transmit-receive interface. Safe power limits were determined for in vivo
scanning on the parallel transmit system using a sequential heating technique [5]
on a tissue-equivalent gel phantom (εr=52, σ=0.56) using MR thermometry.
All volunteer measurements were conducted according to our institution’s IRB. Phases
to the elements were chosen to create constructive interference at the center
of the object. In vivo B1+ maps were obtained with a
turbo-FLASH sequence with preparation pulse [6], and SNR maps were generated
based on GRE measurements obtained with RF excitation and without (TR/TE/BW=200/4.1/300,
FOV/Matrix/Slice=220mm/256/3 mm) using the Kellman method [7]. The 6 channel
TxRx cervical spine array was also compared to the Rapid Biomedical cervical spine
array which has a form-fitting housing around the back of the neck with 4
transmit-receive elements and was used in single transmit mode [1].
Results
For the constructed 6 channel cervical spine
array, the unloaded & loaded Q values were 121
& 20 respectively and the average coupling
between adjacent elements was -25 dB. S
11 of -20 dB or better was
achieved on all elements. A power limit of 3 Watts was applied based on the MR
thermometry measurements. With the 6-channel array, a 90-degree flip angle
could be achieved in the center of the object with a single-channel equivalent 123
volt 500 μs hard pulse (50 volt pulse per channel). For comparison, with the same volunteer
in the Rapid cervical spine coil a 200 volt 500 μs hard pulse was
required. B
1+ maps
obtained
from the in-vivo experiment
are shown in Figure 3. SNR plots for root sum of squares reconstruction in the
volunteer are shown in Figure 4. The average off-diagonal noise correlation was
22.2%. High resolution images of the cervical spinal cord were obtained with a
2D gradient echo sequence (TR/TE/BW=500/5.5/261, FOV/Matrix/Slice=189mm/832/5 mm,
5 slices, acquisition=5:12) (Fig. 5).
Discussion
Compared with the Rapid cervical spine coil, the B
1+ efficiency and B
1+ uniformity in the transverse plane was
improved by the 6 channel coil, especially at the posterior-most 3/4 of the
neck. The SNR in the spinal cord was similar for the 6 channel array and the Rapid
Biomedical coil. Grey and white matter regions in the spinal cord are clearly
depicted. The Rapid Biomedical coil has slightly better coverage in the
head-foot direction. Although the 6 channel coil was used here with a parallel
transmit system for initial tests, it could in principle be driven with a power
splitter and fixed phases to the coil elements to enable use on a single
channel system. For clinical applications, extended coverage in the head-foot
direction would be desirable, which might be possible with a more complicated
coil former and longer coil elements.
Conclusions
A 6 element wrap-around transmit receive array provides a practical and
high performing solution for cervical spine imaging at 7T. The small channel
count may limit accelerated imaging applications, but it performs well for
standard anatomical imaging.
Acknowledgements
The Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and
Research (CAI2R, www.cai2r.net) at New York University School of Medicine is
supported by NIH/NIBIB grant number P41 EB017183.References
[1]
Sigmund E E, Suero G A, Hu C, et al. High-resolution human cervical spinal cord imaging at
7 T[J]. NMR in biomedicine, 2012, 25(7): 891-899.
[2] Zhao W, Cohen-Adad
J, Polimeni J R, et al. Nineteen-channel receive array and
four-channel transmit array coil for cervical spinal cord imaging
at 7T[J]. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2014, 72(1): 291-300.
[3]Zhang
B et al., 7T 22ch Wrap-around Coil
Array for Cervical Spinal Cord Imaging. Proc ISMRM 23, p626 (2015).
[4] Wiggins GC
et al., 7 Tesla Transmit-Receive Array
for Carotid Imaging: Simulation and Experiment. Proc ISMRM 17, p393 (2009) (http://cds.ismrm.org/protected/09Presentations/393/)
[5] Cloos MA et al., Rapid RF Safety
Evaluation for Transmit-Array Coils. Proc ISMRM 21, p286 (2013)
[6] Klose U. Mapping of the radio
frequency magnetic field with a MR snapshot FLASH technique[J]. Medical
physics, 1992, 19(4): 1099-1104.
[7] Kellman P, McVeigh E R. Image
reconstruction in SNR units: A general method for SNR measurement†[J]. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, 2005, 54(6): 1439-1447.