End-Loaded Dipole Array for 10.5T Head Imaging
Russell Luke Lagore1, Lance DelaBarre1, Jinfeng Tian1, Gregor Adriany1, Yigitcan Eryaman1, and J. Thomas Vaughan1

1Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States

Synopsis

The feasibility of human head imaging at 10.5T is demonstrated by the successful acquisition of in vivo porcine head images. This is achieved with an 8-element end-loaded dipole array resonant at 10.5T (447MHz). This dipole array is compared in terms of transmit efficiency and signal-to-noise ratio to a high-pass birdcage coil and loop array at 3T, 7T, and 10.5T. All coils share identical dimensions and element count. While both transmit arrays have comparable SNR performance at 7T, the dipole array is inferior in terms of transmit efficiency compared to the loop array and birdcage coil at all field strengths examined.

Introduction

Our objective is to design, build, and test an RF head coil for demonstrating feasibility of human head imaging in vivo at 10.5T. To this end, we evaluate a number of RF coil designs, beginning with the dipole array reported here. Dipole elements have been used in a variety of transmit array applications1-3 and show promise in high field MRI. In this study, we present an end-loaded dipole array for 10.5T head imaging. An array of these elements is compared to the loop array and birdcage coil at 3T, 7T, and 10.5T.

Methods

Until IRB and IDE approval for 10.5T human studies is received, we demonstrate imaging feasibility with an approximately human-sized, anesthetized pig under an approved IACUC protocol.

For this experiment, a dipole element composed of a pair of radiating and end-loading segments was designed and simulated4 that would be self-resonant at 10.5T (447MHz). Dimensions for all coils were restricted to 16cm length, 25cm ID, and 31cm OD (Figure 1). The end-loading segments (located on the end rings) were parametrized in XFdtd 7.3 (Remcom, USA) to determine their optimal size for self-resonance at 10.5T. The radiating element was constructed from a pair of copper tubes 80mm(L)x6.35mm(OD). The end-loading segments are 20mm wide copper strips subtending an angle of 36° (Figure 2a). This element required minimal impedance matching at 10.5T, and was tuned to 3T and 7T with lumped inductors located between the radiating and end-loading segments (Figure 2b). This dipole design was inspired by the top-loaded monopole antennas used by non-directional beacons for aviation navigation. Top-loading increases the radiation efficiency of the antenna5.

For comparison purposes, a shielded 8-rung high-pass quadrature-driven birdcage coil and an 8-loop decoupled array were also constructed from the same materials to the same dimensions. A cylindrical phantom 32cm long and 16.8cm wide was used for testing the coils. The phantom solution (51.1% Sucrose, 47.6% H2O, 1.3% NaCl) has a εr = 49 and σ = 0.6 S/m6. The radial distance from coil elements to the phantom was 41mm.

For 3T and 7T, the dipole elements were matched on the bench via a pair of series inductors at the feed point and tuned via a pair of inductors located between the radiating segments and end-loading segments (Figure 2b). At 10.5T, the length of the end-loading segment was trimmed to fine tune the resonant frequency. When resonant at 10.5T, the parasitic inductance and capacitance at the feed point were enough to achieve an impedance match without lumped components.

The dipole array, loop array, and birdcage coil were all tested on a Siemens MAGNETOM Trio (3T) and 7T system. Fixed phases were used at 3T to produce circular polarization (CP). The coils were interfaced to the system via an 8-channel T/R switch box (Virtumed LLC, USA). At 7T and 10.5T the B1 field was shimmed for B1+ efficiency at the center of the phantom (coinciding with coil center)7-10. This produced a CP-like B1 field distribution. Two proton-density gradient-echo images (α=60°, 2α=120°) were collected and B1+ maps were calculated via the double-angle method11. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) maps were calculated from the α=60° image and a noise scan12.

Results

The dipole array was used to acquire the first 10.5T in vivo images of a porcine head (Figure 3). The experimentally obtained B1+ maps at 3T, 7T, and 10.5T are shown in Figure 4 with SNR and B1+ values at coil center plotted across field strength in Figure 5. The transmit efficiency of the dipole array sees marked improvement as field strength increases, but never out performs the comparison coils. The SNR is approximately equal for the dipole and loop arrays at 7T. The high-pass birdcage coil failed to resonate at 10.5T and was excluded. SNR results at 10.5T are currently unavailable.

Discussion

The dipole array presented is a very simple design because it is self-resonant and does not rely on lumped components. Unfortunately, while the dipole array performs well in terms of SNR, it is inferior to both the loop array and birdcage coil in terms of transmit efficiency. Although the high-pass birdcage coil failed to resonate at 10.5T, a band-pass birdcage coil can be made resonant at higher frequencies and may provide another point of comparison.

Conclusion

Feasibility of successful in vivo head imaging has been demonstrated for the first time at 10.5T. The end-loaded dipole array provides a viable alternative to traditional transmit arrays at 10.5T, while remaining inferior in terms of transmit efficiency. Future work will compare the dipole array to the band-pass birdcage coil and other line element arrays.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH NIBIB P41-EB015894, NIH NIBIB S10 RR026783, NIH NIBIB S10RR029672, NIH NIBIB R01-EB006835, NIH NIBIB R21-EB009133, and WM KECK Foundation.

References

1. 1. Raaijmakers AJE, Italiaander M, Voogt IJ, Luijten PR, Hoogduin JM, Klomp DWJ, van den Berg CAT. The fractionated dipole antenna: A new antenna for body imaging at 7 Tesla. Magn. Reson. Med. [Internet] 2015. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25596.

2. Hong S, Park JH, Woo M, Kim Y, Cho Z. New Design Concept of Monopole Antenna Array for UHF 7T MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. [Internet] 2014;71:1944–1952. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24844.

3. Chen G, Cloos M, Sodickson D, Wiggins G. A 7T 8 channel transmit-receive dipole array for head imaging: dipole element and coil evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. ; 2014. p. 621.

4. Tian J, Lagore R, Vaughan JT. Dipole Arrays for MR Head Imaging: 7T vs. 10.5T. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. ; 2015. p. 3116.

5. Johnson RC, Jasik H. Low Frequency Antennas. In: Crawford HB, editor. Antenna Engineering Handbook. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1984. pp. 24–5 – 24–10.

6. Beck BL, Jenkins KA, Rocca JR, Fitzsimmons JR. Tissue-equivalent phantoms for high frequencies. Concepts Magn. Reson. [Internet] 2004;20B:30–33. doi: 10.1002/cmr.b.20002.

7. Van de Moortele P-F, Akgun C, Adriany G, Moeller S, Ritter J, Collins CM, Smith MB, Vaughan JT, Ugurbil K. B1 destructive interferences and spatial phase patterns at 7 T with a head transceiver array coil. Magn. Reson. Med. [Internet] 2005;54:1503–18. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20708.

8. Metzger GJ, Snyder C, Akgun C, Vaughan T, Ugurbil K, Van de Moortele P-F. Local B1+ shimming for prostate imaging with transceiver arrays at 7T based on subject-dependent transmit phase measurements. Magn. Reson. Med. [Internet] 2008;59:396–409. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21476.

9. Metzger GJ, Auerbach EJ, Akgun C, Simonson J, Bi X, Ugurbil K, Van de Moortele P-F. Dynamically applied B1+ shimming solutions for non-contrast enhanced renal angiography at 7.0 Tesla. Magn. Reson. Med. [Internet] 2013;69:114–26. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24237.

10. Schmitter S, Wu X, DelaBarre L, Ugurbil K, Van de Moortele P-F. Predistorted B1 shimming: a new concept based on mutual enhancement between static B1 shim and 1D spoke RF pulse design. Application for cardiac imaging at 7 Tesla. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. ; 2012. p. 83.

11. Insko E, Bolinger L. Mapping of the radiofrequency field. J. Magn. Reson. A [Internet] 1993;102:82.

12. Roemer PB, Edelstein W a, Hayes CE, Souza SP, Mueller OM. The NMR phased array. Magn. Reson. Med. [Internet] 1990;16:192–225.

Figures

Figure 1: Model of the end-loaded dipole array with physical dimensions (which are identical for all coil designs) as shown.

Figure 2: (a) Photo of the end-loaded dipole array tuned to 447 MHz (10.5T) with the end-loading and radiating segments labeled. (b) Detail photo showing the inductors used to tune and match the coil to 297.2 MHz (7T).

Figure 3: In vivo image of a porcine head acquired with the end-loaded dipole array at 10.5T (TSE: TR/TE=5000/60ms, ETL=7, matrix=256x256, 0.77x0.77x3 mm3).

Figure 4: Comparison of experimentally obtained axial B1+ maps, in terms of transmit efficiency, of the birdcage coil (left), loop array (center), and dipole array (right) at 3T (top), 7T (middle), and 10.5T (bottom). A phantom with a center hole was used at 3T causing the void in those maps.

Figure 5: Transmit (B1+) efficiency (solid lines) and SNR (dashed lines) at coil/phantom center for the dipole array, loop array, and birdcage coil at 3T, 7T, and 10.5T.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2138