Design and construction of a triple-tuned RF probe for 23Na/31P/1H using traps
Arthur W. Magill1, Chang-Hoon Choi1, Yonghyun Ha1, and N. Jon Shah1,2

1Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Juelich, Germany, 2Department of Neurology, JARA, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

Synopsis

Traps may be used to dual-tune an RF probe, either by splitting the resonance of a single tuned circuit, or by blocking coupling at the higher frequency when using a pair of resonant circuits. This work combines both methods to construct a triple-tuned probe consisting of a nested pair of loops. The inner loop incorporates two traps, one to prevent coupling to the outer loop, which is tuned to 1H, and a second to simultaneously tune the loop to 23Na and 31P. The probe is designed for use at 4T, with resonances at 45MHz (23Na), 69MHz (31P) and 170MHz (1H).

Purpose

Multi-tuned RF probes enables near-simultaneous interrogation of different nuclei within a single experiment.1 This work describes the design and construction of a triple-tuned RF probe for detection of 23Na, 31P and 1H using traps. Traps may be used to dual-tune an RF probe, either by splitting the resonance of a single tuned circuit,2 or by blocking coupling at the higher frequency when using a pair of resonant circuits.3 This work combines both methods to construct a triple-tuned probe consisting of a nested pair of loops (fig. 1). The probe is designed for use at 4T, with resonances at 45MHz (23Na), 69MHz (31P) and 170MHz (1H). The inner loop incorporates two traps, one to prevent coupling to the outer loop, which is tuned to 1H, and a second to simultaneously tune the loop to 23Na and 31P.

Methods

Circuit simulations were used to find trap component values that give strong blocking at the 1H frequency and low loss at the 23Na and 31P frequencies. The inner loop inductance and loaded Q-factor were 153nH and 30, respectively; trap inductors were assumed to have a Q-factor of 100. Two parameters were swept: the pass-frequency of the blocking trap (f1), and the parallel resonance frequency of the splitting trap (f2). Component values for the blocking trap were calculated first, with the blocking trap inductor (Ltr1) chosen to be twice the minimum possible value at each f1. Splitting trap component values were then calculated, taking account of the frequency-dependent reactance of the blocking trap.

A pair of concentric square loops were then built using 6mm copper tape (inner loop 60×60mm2, outer loop 100×100mm2, inner dimensions). The loop response was measured using a network analyser (ZNB, Rohde & Schwarz) either directly connected to the loops or via a pair of loosely coupled sniffer loops. The inductor in the blocking trap was adjusted to minimise coupling to the outer loop at 170MHz. The splitting trap was then adjusted to correctly tune the 45MHz and 69MHz resonances. Q-factors were then measured while the probe was loaded with a phosphate-buffered saline phantom, and compared to those of isolated single-tuned loops of the same dimensions.

Results

Figure 2 shows the circuit simulation results: (a,b,c) show calculated inductor and capacitor values for the splitting trap; (c,d) show Q-factors of the loaded trapped coil, relative loaded single-resonant loops of the same size, calculated as Qrel = 1/(1+Rtr/Rloop), where Rtr and Rloop are the resistances of the trap and loaded loop, respectively; (e) shows the difference in trap resistance, relative to the loop resistance, at 45 and 69MHz. The circle indicates the operating point (f1=31MHz, f2=57MHz) chosen for the constructed probe, giving Ltr1=21nH, Cs1=238pF, Cp1=50pF, Ltr2=28nH, Cp2=270pF and Cs2=64pF. The resistance of the blocking trap is 0.04/0.08Ω at 45/69 MHz; for the splitting trap it is 0.48/0.73Ω, giving relative loaded Q-factors of 0.77 at both frequencies.

Measured S-parameters for the constructed probe (fig. 3) show the two resonant modes of the inner loop, the 1H resonance of the outer loop, and low coupling between loops at the 1H frequency. The table in fig. 4 presents the measured Q-factors of the triple-resonant probe, and those of the equivalent single-tuned loops at the three frequencies of interest.

Discussion

Design of the blocking trap is straightforward, provided that the trap-mode frequency is placed well above the blocking frequency.4 There is a small reduction in trap resistance at the 23Na and 31P frequencies as f1 is reduced, accompanied by a small reduction in blocking efficiency at the 1H frequency. Design of the splitting trap requires more attention; the trap resistance at the two resonance frequencies depends strongly on f2, varying in opposite sense at the 23Na and 31P frequencies. For the constructed probe, f2 was chosen to balance the trap resistance at both frequencies.

The design approach demonstrated here, in which a dual-tuned X/Y resonator is decoupled from a separate 1H resonator using a blocking trap, is well suited for use at UHF where the 1H probe often uses a different design (dipoles, patches, etc.) to the non-proton resonator, which can use a more traditional approach such as a birdcage.

Conclusion

We have demonstrated a triple-tuned probe using a dual-tuned 23Na/31P coil nested inside a 1H resonator. While the blocking trap introduces very low loss at the lower frequencies, designing the splitting trap for low loss at both frequencies is difficult as these frequencies are relatively close together (γ23Na31P=0.65). The design was demonstrated using 23Na, 31P and 1H, but is equally applicable to other combinations of nuclei.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Meyerspeer M, Magill AW, Kuehne A, Gruetter R, Moser E, Schmid AI, Simultaneous and Interleaved Acquisition of NMR Signals from Different Nuclei with a Clinical MRI Scanner. Magn Reson. Med. DOI 10.1002/mrm.26056.

2. Schnall M, Probes tuned to multiple frequencies for in vivo NMR, NMR Basic Principles and Progress. 1992;26:33–63.

3. Alecci M, Romanzetti S, Kaffanke J, Celik A, Wegener HP, Shah NJ. Practical design of a 4 Tesla double-tuned RF surface coil for interleaved 1H and 23Na MRI of rat brain. J Magn Reson 2006;181:203–211.

4. Meyerspeer M, Roig ES, Gruetter R, Magill AW. An improved trap design for decoupling multinuclear RF coils. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72(2):584-590.

Figures

The probe consists of two concentric loops. The outer loop is tuned to 1H. The inner loop includes a trap (B) to block coupling at the 1H frequency, and a second trap (S) to split the resonance, allowing simultaneous tuning to 23Na and 31P.

Circuit simulation results: (a) inductor and (b,c) capacitor values for the splitting-trap as a function of blocking-trap pass frequency (f1) and splitting-trap parallel resonance frequency (f2); ratio of trapped to single-tuned coil Q-factors (both loaded) at (d) 45MHz and (e) 69MHz; (e) difference between trap resistance at 45MHz and 69MHz.

Measured S11 (blue), S22 (red) and S21 (green), showing the 23Na and 31P peaks of the inner loop, the 1H resonance of the outer loop, low coupling between loops at the 1H frequency and stronger coupling at the trap-mode (TM) resonance.

Measured Q-factors (unloaded/loaded/ratio) for the triple-tuned probe, and the equivalent single-tuned loops.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2135