Synopsis
Traps may be used
to dual-tune an RF probe, either by splitting the resonance of a single tuned
circuit, or by blocking coupling at the higher frequency when using a pair of
resonant circuits. This work combines both methods to construct a triple-tuned
probe consisting of a nested pair of loops. The inner loop incorporates two
traps, one to prevent coupling to the outer loop, which is tuned to 1H,
and a second to simultaneously tune the loop to 23Na and 31P.
The probe is designed for use at 4T, with resonances at 45MHz (23Na),
69MHz (31P) and 170MHz (1H).Purpose
Multi-tuned RF probes enables near-simultaneous
interrogation of different nuclei within a single experiment.
1 This work describes the design and construction of a
triple-tuned RF probe for detection of
23Na,
31P and
1H
using traps. Traps may be used to dual-tune an RF probe, either by splitting
the resonance of a single tuned circuit,
2 or by blocking coupling at
the higher frequency when using a pair of resonant circuits.
3 This
work combines both methods to construct a triple-tuned probe consisting of a
nested pair of loops (fig. 1). The probe is designed for use at 4T, with
resonances at 45MHz (
23Na), 69MHz (
31P) and 170MHz (
1H).
The inner loop incorporates two traps, one to prevent coupling to the outer
loop, which is tuned to
1H, and a second to simultaneously tune the
loop to
23Na and
31P.
Methods
Circuit simulations were used to find trap component
values that give strong blocking at the 1H frequency and low loss at
the 23Na and 31P frequencies. The inner loop inductance and
loaded Q-factor were 153nH and 30, respectively; trap inductors were assumed to
have a Q-factor of 100. Two parameters were swept: the pass-frequency of the
blocking trap (f1), and the parallel resonance frequency of the
splitting trap (f2). Component values for the blocking trap were
calculated first, with the blocking trap inductor (Ltr1) chosen to
be twice the minimum possible value at each f1. Splitting trap component values were then calculated, taking account of the
frequency-dependent reactance of the blocking trap.
A pair of concentric square loops were then built
using 6mm copper tape (inner loop 60×60mm2, outer loop 100×100mm2, inner dimensions). The
loop response was measured using a network analyser (ZNB, Rohde & Schwarz) either
directly connected to the loops or via a pair of loosely coupled sniffer loops.
The inductor in the blocking trap was adjusted to minimise coupling to the outer
loop at 170MHz. The splitting trap was then adjusted to correctly tune the 45MHz
and 69MHz resonances. Q-factors were then measured while the probe was loaded
with a phosphate-buffered saline phantom, and compared to those of isolated single-tuned loops of
the same dimensions.
Results
Figure 2 shows the circuit simulation results: (a,b,c)
show calculated inductor and capacitor values for the splitting trap; (c,d)
show Q-factors of the loaded trapped coil, relative loaded single-resonant loops of the same size, calculated as Qrel
= 1/(1+Rtr/Rloop), where Rtr and Rloop are the resistances of the trap and loaded loop, respectively; (e) shows the
difference in trap resistance, relative to the loop resistance, at 45 and 69MHz.
The circle indicates the operating point (f1=31MHz, f2=57MHz)
chosen for the constructed probe, giving Ltr1=21nH, Cs1=238pF,
Cp1=50pF, Ltr2=28nH, Cp2=270pF and Cs2=64pF.
The resistance of the blocking trap is 0.04/0.08Ω at 45/69 MHz; for the splitting trap it is
0.48/0.73Ω, giving relative loaded Q-factors of 0.77
at both frequencies.
Measured S-parameters for the constructed probe (fig.
3) show the two resonant modes of the inner loop, the 1H resonance
of the outer loop, and low coupling between loops at the 1H
frequency. The table in fig. 4 presents the measured Q-factors of the
triple-resonant probe, and those of the equivalent single-tuned loops at the
three frequencies of interest.
Discussion
Design of the blocking trap is straightforward,
provided that the trap-mode frequency is placed well above the blocking
frequency.4 There is a small reduction in trap resistance at the 23Na
and 31P frequencies as f1 is
reduced, accompanied by a small reduction in blocking efficiency at the 1H
frequency. Design of the splitting trap requires more attention; the trap
resistance at the two resonance frequencies depends strongly on f2,
varying in opposite sense at the 23Na and 31P frequencies.
For the constructed probe, f2 was chosen to balance the trap
resistance at both frequencies.
The design approach demonstrated here, in which a
dual-tuned X/Y resonator is decoupled from a separate 1H resonator using
a blocking trap, is well suited for use at UHF where the 1H probe
often uses a different design (dipoles, patches, etc.) to the non-proton resonator,
which can use a more traditional approach such as a birdcage.
Conclusion
We have demonstrated a triple-tuned probe using a
dual-tuned
23Na/
31P coil nested inside a
1H resonator. While the blocking trap introduces very low loss at
the lower frequencies, designing the splitting trap for low loss at both
frequencies is difficult as these frequencies are relatively close together (γ
23Na /γ
31P=0.65). The design was demonstrated using
23Na,
31P
and
1H, but is equally applicable to other combinations of nuclei.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Meyerspeer M, Magill AW, Kuehne A, Gruetter R,
Moser E, Schmid AI, Simultaneous and Interleaved Acquisition of NMR Signals from Different
Nuclei with a Clinical MRI Scanner. Magn Reson. Med. DOI 10.1002/mrm.26056.
2. Schnall M, Probes tuned to multiple frequencies for in vivo NMR, NMR Basic
Principles and Progress. 1992;26:33–63.
3. Alecci M, Romanzetti S, Kaffanke J, Celik A, Wegener HP, Shah NJ.
Practical design of a 4 Tesla double-tuned RF surface coil for interleaved 1H
and 23Na MRI of rat brain. J Magn Reson 2006;181:203–211.
4. Meyerspeer M, Roig ES, Gruetter R, Magill AW. An improved trap design
for decoupling multinuclear RF coils. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72(2):584-590.