Jan Paska1,2, Martijn Cloos1,2, Gillian Haemer1,2,3, Bei Zhang1,2, and Graham C Wiggins1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, Newyork, NY, United States, 2Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), NYU School of Medicine, Newyork, NY, United States, 3The Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, NYU School of Medicine, Newyork, NY, United States
Synopsis
A body array at 7T was optimized in simulation for potential hybrid
elements, including dipoles, loops, and birdcage arrays. The optimal coil,
consisting of 8 transmit/receive dipoles and an 8ch birdcage receive coil, was
built and tested as proof of principle.Introduction
Body
imaging at 7T is challenging due to wavelength effects, power constraints, and
SAR sensitivity, especially in deep tissue such as the prostate [1]. Hybrid
coil arrays, consisting of both radiative antennas and classical resonators, have
been shown to increase imaging performance at 7T [2,3,4]. Here we investigate
this design concept for body imaging. A hybrid array was optimized in simulation, candidates for
both
transmit and receive were dipole, loop, and birdcage arrays. The optimal
array was build
and initial images were acquired.
Optimization
Imaging performance of a coil array for body imaging of the 50
percentile man [5] and smaller was optimized in EM simulations (HFSS, Ansoft),
choosing an elliptical phantom (38x29cm, length=60cm) with average body
properties (ɛ
r=32,
σ=0.4S/m)
as an imaging target. Coil conductors were placed ≥3cm from the subject for load
stability, 2cm beneath an elliptical shield (48x40cm, 40cm length) used for
cable stabilization and patient safety. Type, size, and lumped element
distribution were subject to optimization.
The 8ch array candidates were a dipole, a loop, and a birdcage array. The
dipole array was optimized for inductor length and location, assuming half
wavelength resonance; the loop array was optimized for length and width of
individual elements; and the 8-port driven birdcage was optimized for length as
well as lumped element capacitance and location. Distance between lumped
elements was ≥5cm, and individual elements were evenly distributed
around the coil.
The 8ch transmit coil configuration was
optimized first, based on the trade-off between power and local SAR sensitivity
in the central voxel. Load stability was verified on the optimal model. Receive
coil performance was then optimized for an 8ch receive coil, added to the chosen
transmit array, aiming to maximize SNR for the central voxel. Co-simulation was
used to optimize lumped element distribution, and all elements were matched to
50Ω.
Optimization Results
A
dipole array (30cm elements length, inductors 5cm from the feed point) was
found to have optimal transmit performance, with reasonable trade-off between
power and SAR sensitivity [Figure1]. A birdcage array (20cm length, 4 pF end-ring
capacitance, 20pF leg capacitance) produced optimal SNR for the central voxel
[Figure2].
Construction
A shield, made of sixteen 30cm long PCB shield elements attached to a
3D printed holder, acted as structure both for interior coil conductors and the
exterior DC and RF cabling [Figure 3]. The top and bottom sections of the array are
separable for patient accessibility. The shield and the birdcage coil are
connected with socket connectors at the split. Conductors are routed at a feed
point behind the shield for both arrays, with a two wire line connected to a
lattice balun for dipole elements, and a preamp board including detuning for
the birdcage elements (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Both the preamplifier board and the lattice balun
were mounted outside the shield elements. Special care was taken in constructing
the lattice baluns used to match the
dipole elements, to avoid cable currents. Baluns were characterized in a
separate
3 port measurement fixture [Figure3c], to ensure a 180 degree phase
shift and equal
amplitude at the differential port. The shield was slotted and shorted
with 470pF SMD capacitors, to avoid eddy currents at gradient frequencies. The
eight birdcage channels were routed through an ODU. Transmit coils were matched
to a body sized phantom with tissue equivalent properties, and connected to an in
house built T/R interface box. Passive
detuning circuits were placed in the end-rings in addition to the active
detuning in the feed port of the birdcage coil, to ensure invisibility from the
dipole array during transmit and to maintain transmit efficiency. Power matching and pre-amplifier input match was performed using a body sized phantom (23x33cm length=43cm) filled with tissue simulating liquid.
Experimental Data
Initial imaging experiments were performed on a 7T system (Siemens, Erlangen,
Germany), with low power localizers used
to show expected field distributions in quadrature drive [Figure 4].
Conclusion
An extensive optimization of different coil designs was performed for
abdominal imaging at 7T, and the
optimal coil array was constructed. Preliminary
results showed that imaging with an 8ch dipole transmit, 16ch dipole/birdcage receive
coil is possible. However, additional active detuning of the birdcage coil,
on-coil TR switches, and pre-amplifiers for the dipole elements are still
forthcoming, so coil performance is not yet optimal. Currently, the long cables
used in the transmit path degrade the usable input power to the coil as well as
the receive signal for the dipole elements, and a solution to this will be
explored in future work.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Vaughan J, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 61:244–248 (2009)
[2] Wiggins G. Proc. ISMRM 2013 p2737
[3] Lattanzi R, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 68:286–304 (2012)
[4] Schnell W, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 48, No. 3, 418-428 (2000)
[5] Henry Dreyfuss, The measure of man & woman, John Wiley & Sons (2002)