Shajan Gunamony1, Jens Hoffmann1, Gregor Adriany2, Kamil Ugurbil2, and Klaus Scheffler1
1Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany, 2Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Synopsis
Transmit elements arranged in multiple rows are beneficial
in extending longitudinal coverage and achieve whole brain excitation at
ultra-high field strengths. Furthermore, studies have shown that dual-row
arrays produce less local SAR. Receive arrays shaped to the contours of the
anatomy improves the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the image. In this work, we
develop a 2x8 transmit array for spin excitation in combination with a
32-channel high sensitive receive array for human brain imaging at 7T. Critical
coil performance parameters like transmit efficiency and SNR were
evaluated. Introduction
It is well established that transmit arrays
are essential to mitigate B
1+ inhomogeneities at
ultra-high field (UHF, ≥7T) [1, 2]. Furthermore, dual-row transmit arrays
provide better RF performance in terms of reduced local SAR compared to single
row transmit arrays [3-5]. In this work, we develop a 2x8 transmit array for a
7T 16-channel parallel transmit (pTx) system. Compared to our previous
inductively decoupled design [5], we evaluated here transmit array with
geometrically overlapped larger transmit elements. For high sensitivity during
reception, a 31-channel tight fitting receive array was combined with the
transmit array.
Methods
Experiments were performed on a Siemens 7T
(297.2MHz) whole body MR scanner.
Transmit
array:
Sixteen loops were arranged in two rows, covering 20cm along the Z-direction,
on a 275mm tube with 2.5mm wall thickness. Increasing the sample loading and
integrating the receive array without influencing transmit performance were the
factors that determined the configuration of the transmit array (Fig.1).
Adjacent elements (transverse and longitudinal) were geometrically decoupled
and the diagonal elements were decoupled using inductors. The two rows were
stacked along Z-direction, without any angular rotation between them. This
provides a straight forward solution to route the receive array cables through
the middle of the transmit elements. Each loop consisted of 12 capacitors, two
decoupling inductors and a PIN diode for active detuning.
Receive
array:
31-receive elements were arranged in four rows on a helmet shaped former (L/R –
186mm, A/P – 220mm, S/I – 220mm) [5]. Receive elements were arranged around the
helmet, following the contours of the brain anatomy. The top two rows had 10-elements
each, forming a complete ring while 3rd and 4th row formed
partial rings with 7 and 4 elements, respectively. Adjacent elements within the
row were inductively decoupled. Each element of the lower row geometrically
overlapped with two elements of the upper row. A figure-8 coil, with eye cut-outs,
is planned for the 3rd row. This might contribute to enhancing the
central SNR. A protection fuse (315mA) was installed in each receive channel. The
entire receive electronics with preamplifiers (WanTcom, MN, USA), cable traps
and scanner interface were assembled on to a holder mounted on top of the
helmet, above the FOV of the transmit array (Fig.2).
Scanner
interface: The coil can be interfaced to either single channel
transmit or 16-channel pTx system. The initial results presented here were
acquired in the single channel mode by driving the coil through a 1x16 splitter
(Werlatone, NY, USA). For CP mode, the two coils in the same column had same
phase and adjacent elements within the row had 45° phase increments. For active
detuning, 16 of the 32 PIN-bias lines were routed to the transmit coil and the
remaining 16 controlled the 32-receive channels.
SNR
maps and B1+ maps were acquired using a head and shoulder phantom filled with
tissue equivalent solution [5]. For performance evaluation, a commercial
8Tx/32Rx array was used as the baseline.
Results and Discussion
Highest coupling in the transmit array was between
the adjacent elements within the row (-8 to -11dB). The average isolation
between the overlapped elements in the same column and the diagonal elements
was -20.6dB and -24.8dB, respectively. All receive elements were matched to
better than -18dB and the average preamplifier decoupling was 21.9dB. The
unloaded Q of a single isolated receive element was 194 and the Q-ratio varied
from 10 to 6 for a distance of 10 to 20mm from the phantom. The average active
detuning of the transmit and receive array was 32dB and 36dB, respectively.
The
transmit efficiency of the dual-row coil is within 7% of the baseline coil (Fig
3). It is interesting to note that the B1+ profile in CP mode drops abruptly
towards the end of the coil, though outside the brain volume. However, the dual-row
configuration provides additional degrees of freedom to extend the longitudinal
coverage, if required.
The
SNR of the 31-channel receive array was better in the periphery, especially in
the dome of the helmet. Similar SNR was achieved in the center of the brain
(Fig.4). This gain is most likely due to the continuous arrangement of coil
elements around the helmet and additional receive elements in the dome (20
coils in top two rows). Whole brain coverage with sufficient uniformity was
achieved as demonstrated in the spin-echo in-vivo images (Fig. 5).
Conclusion
Initial
performance evaluation of the developed coil array in CP mode shows whole brain
coverage and high SNR. The full RF capability of the dual-row coil setup will
be evaluated in a 16-channel pTx system.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Mark Ladd and Andreas Bitz of DKFZ,
Heidelberg for generous allocation of scan time to validate the coil. NIH Grant
support P41 EB015894, P30 NS076408, S10
RR026783.References
[1] Van de Moortele P.F et al. MRM 54 :1503-1518 (2005), [2] Adriany G et al. MRM 53 :
434-445 (2005), [3] Wu X et al. Proc. 22nd
ISMRM p543 (2014),
[4] Adriany G. et al. Proc. 15th ISMRM p168 (2007,
[
5] Shajan G et al. MRM 71 870-879
(2014)