Xinqiang Yan1,2 and Xiaoliang Zhang3
1Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 3Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using regular microstrip resonators as RF array elements for traveling wave parallel imaging. In the proposed microstrip array, electromagnetic decoupling between the array elements is sufficient for the practical use. Additionally, geometric factors and diverse B1 fields from individual array elements can be obtained in a relatively large area in the magnet bore. Furthermore, in non-accelerated imaging applications, this decoupled multi-channel traveling wave method could improve sensitivity of traveling wave MRI, which is currently a main issue for traveling wave MRI.Purpose
It has been demonstrated that parallel imaging can be realized in
traveling wave MRI [1] by using multiple patch antennas on the whole body 7T MR
[2]. The physical size of the patch antennas is relatively big, particularly
when using them as RF array elements. This potentially limits the number of
channels. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using relatively small
microstrip resonators [3, 4] as RF array elements for traveling wave parallel
imaging. This
multi-channel array method can be also used as a way to alleviating the low SNR
problem of the traveling wave MR. In the proposed design, all the microstrip resonators are arranged
along the circumference of the magnet bore. This arrangement would provide more
diverse B
1 distribution from each array element in the imaging area and help to
gain parallel imaging performance. It also provides easy access for patients to
the magnet.
Methods
A copper cylinder bore with a diameter of 63 cm and a length of 160
cm was used as waveguide, as shown in Fig. 1. Microstrip array with 8
elements was placed at one end of the bore. Each element is a typical quarter-wavelength
microstrip line resonator, with one end terminated with tuning and matching
capacitors and the other end shorted. The widths of ground and stripe
conductor are 2.54 cm and 0.635 cm, respectively. Compared with traditional
half-wavelength resonators [3], quarter-wavelength resonators have a reduced dimension
and alternate magnetic/electric field distributions, which ultimately decrease
the coupling between adjacent elements.
Simulations
were performed using a full-wave electromagnetic software (HFSS, ANSYS,
Canonsburg, PA, USA). S-parameter performance, noise correlation matrix and B
1
field distribution were evaluated in the simulation. G-factors for 1D SENSE
were calculated by the method in Pruessmann et al [5].
Results
Fig. 2A
shows the reflection coefficients (S11) of each element and transmission
coefficients (S21) between any two elements. It is clear from Fig. 2A that all microstrip
elements were well matched to 50 ohm, with S11 better than -30 dB. This ensures
the accuracy of the simulation. S21 is about -29 dB between adjacent elements
and better than -40 dB between non-adjacent elements, indicating excellent
decoupling performance. This excellent decoupling performance has also been
validated by the noise correlation matrix (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 3A shows
that sagittal B1+ field in empty bore when all eight elements was driven with circular
polarization (CP) mode. It is clear from Fig. 3A that B1 distribution along
z-direction was quite homogeneous, illustrating “traveling wave” behavior. Fig.
3B and 3C show the transverse B1 profiles of eight elements when fed individually.
The axial planes in Fig. 3B and Fig. 3C are 50 cm and 100 cm away from the microstrip
array, respectively. Each element shows different B1 profile, making it
possible to perform parallel transmission and parallel imaging.
Fig.
4 shows the axial g-factor maps on a water phantom. These axial planes are 40
cm to 120 cm away from the microstrip array. Average g-factor values are marked
in red color in Fig. 4. For most of the slices, the average g-factor at can be
better than 1.1 when R=2. Fig. 5 shows the SNR maps from all eight channels (top
row) and a single channel (bottom row). SNR was calculated by the method in
Kellman et al [6]. Due to the excellent decoupling performance (Fig. 2A and B),
SNR can be significantly improved by using all eight channels simultaneously.
Conclusions
In
the proposed microstrip array traveling wave imaging, geometric factors and
diverse B
1 fields from individual array elements can be obtained in a
relatively large area in the magnet bore. Additionally, electromagnetic
decoupling between the microstrip elements is sufficient for the practical use.
This result shows that it is possible to use microstrip resonators as RF array
elements for traveling wave parallel imaging. The proposed method provides a
way to increasing channel number in traveling wave parallel imaging using
multi-channel RF arrays. In non-accelerated imaging applications, this decoupled
multi-channel traveling wave method may be a way to improve sensitivity of
traveling wave MRI, which is currently a main issue for traveling wave MRI.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH
R01 EB016695.References
[1]
Brunner DO, et al. Nature 2009; 457:994-9. [2] Pang Y, et al. MRM 2012; 67(4):
965–978. [3] Adriany G, et al, MRM 2005; 53:434–445. [4] Zhang X, et al, MRM
2001; 46: 443–450. [5] Pruessmann KP, et al. MRM. 1999; 42 (5):952-62. [6] Kellman
P, et al. MRM. 2005; 54(6): 1439–1447.