Tongxin Chen1, Fuyixue Wang1, Zijing Dong1, Haikun Qi2, Shi Wang3, Huijun Chen2, and Kui Ying3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 2Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 3Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging, Ministry of Education, Medical Engineering and Institute, Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
Radial sampling is sensitive to
trajectory errors and can cause image distortions. To investigate the effect of
trajectory errors on temperature imaging, we first evaluated the use of
Trajectory Auto-Corrected Image Reconstruction (TrACR), a method to reconstruct
radial images without trajectory errors, for radial temperature imaging. Then,
we examined the feasibility of TrACR with only one calibration on dynamic
temperature imaging based on the assumption that gradient errors are
time-invariant. Through phantom heating experiments, we validated that both of
the TrACR and the single-calibration TrACR can correct the errors of normal and
golden angle radial sampling and provide improved temperature accuracy.Target audience
Scientists and clinicians interested in MR
Thermometry.
Purpose
Radial k-space sampling is insensitive to motion
due to its efficient coverage of k-space. However, radial sampling is
particularly sensitive to trajectory errors, and thus is likely to cause image
distortions. Recently, Trajectory Auto-Corrected Image Reconstruction (TrACR)
1 has been proposed as a general method to reconstruct radial images free of
trajectory errors. In this work, we first evaluated the effect of TrACR for
radial temperature imaging. Then, we examined the feasibility of this method on
dynamic temperature imaging with only one calibration in order to reduce the
computation time based on the assumption that gradient errors are
time-invariant
2.
Methods
A cooling down process of a 1% agar
phantom was scanned by an 8 channel head coil (Invivo Corp, Gainesville) after the
phantom was heated to about 50℃. The data were acquired respectively
by a normal radial sequence and a golden angle radial sequence on a Philips 3T
system (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherland). An optic fiber was inserted
into the phantom to collect the temperature data as a reference. Imaging
parameters for the phantom experiment: acquisition matrix size = 80 × 80, FOV =
160mm×160mm, slice thickness=3mm, TR = 50ms, TE = 10ms, flip angle = 15°, number
of projections=100, 160 k-space samples each projection.
TrACR
is a method to correct trajectory errors based on SENSE parallel imaging reconstruction.
Our evaluation and analysis were divided into two steps. In the first step, the
fully sampled data were corrected by TrACR in which the calibration for
trajectory correction was done in every time frame. In the second step, single-calibration
TrACR was performed in which all images used the same trajectory estimation derived
from the image of first frame. Temperature maps were calculated using proton
resonance frequency shift method 3 based on a fully-sampled reference. Subsequently,
the data without correction, and the data corrected by TrACR and single-calibration
TrACR were evaluated and compared.
Results
Temperature maps reconstructed from the initial
data, the data corrected by TrACR and single-calibration TrACR with normal
radial and golden angle radial are shown in Figure 1 respectively. Figure 2 shows
and compares the temperature evolution curves. The curve corrected by TrACR and
the curve corrected by single-calibration TrACR are closer to the reference
than the curve without correction, especially with golden angle radial. Table 1 shows
the temporal root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of the temperature evolution
curves showed in Figure 2. The difference between RMSEs of conventional TrACR
and single-calibration is less than 0.05℃.
Discussion and
Conclusion
According to our results, the trajectory errors
can lead to obvious temperature errors, thus it is necessary to correct
trajectory errors for accurate temperature imaging. Both of the TrACR and the single-calibration
TrACR can correct the errors, and the results of golden angle radial sampling
could be better corrected by these two methods. The single-calibration TrACR in
this work can acquire similar results to the ones corrected by TrACR with calibration
in images from every time frame, but costs less time due to fewer calibration
processes. The results indicate that the
single-calibration TrACR is feasible for dynamic temperature imaging and the
assumption that gradient errors are time-invariant may be meaningful.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China, 61571257.References
1. Ianni, J. D., & Grissom, W.
A. (2015). Trajectory Auto-Corrected
image reconstruction. Magnetic resonance in medicine.
2. Brodsky, E. K., Samsonov, A. A.,
& Block, W. F. (2009). Characterizing and correcting gradient errors in non-cartesian imaging: Are gradient errors
linear time-invariant
(LTI)?. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 62(6), 1466-1476.
3.
Grimault, S., Lucas, T., Quellec, S., & Mariette, F. (2004). Quantitative
measurement of temperature by proton resonance frequency shift at low field: a
general method to correct non-linear spatial and temporal phase deformations.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 170(1), 79-87.