Synopsis
Diffusion-weighted
imaging (DWI) intrinsically suffers from low SNR due to diffusion-induced
signal losses. Multiple acquisitions have to be averaged to attain reasonable
SNR level in high-spatial-resolution DWI images. However, subject motion during
diffusion-sensitizing gradients creates varying phase offsets between repeated
acquisitions, prohibiting a direct complex averaging of the image repetitions. Here,
we propose a phase-correcting non-local means denoising filter that combines
multiple DWI acquisitions while effectively reducing noise and phase
cancellations. Results are demonstrated in vivo in the cervical spinal cord at
3T, using a reduced field-of-view DWI with 0.9 x 0.9 mm2 in-plane
resolution. Purpose
To combine multiple diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquisitions while effectively reducing noise and phase cancellations.
Introduction
Diffusion-weighted imaging
(DWI) intrinsically suffers from low SNR due to diffusion-induced exponential
signal losses. Hence, multiple acquisitions have to be averaged to attain
reasonable SNR level in high-spatial-resolution DWI images. However, subject motion
during diffusion-sensitizing gradients creates varying phase offsets between
repeated acquisitions
1. Consequently, a direct combination of image
repetitions through complex averaging causes phase cancellations and a signal
loss. Here, we propose a phase-correcting non-local means denoising filter that combines
multiple DWI acquisitions while effectively reducing noise and phase
cancellations.
Methods
In vivo DWI images of the cervical spinal cord were acquired in the sagittal
plane, on a 3T GE MR 750 scanner using 6-channel cervico-thoracic-lumbar (CTL)
coil. To achieve high in-plane resolution, the fied-of-view (FOV) in the
phase-encode (PE) direction was reduced using a 2D echo-planar RF excitation
pulse 2-5. Single-shot EPI readout with 192x48 imaging matrix, 62.5% partial
k-space coverage in the PE direction (i.e., 40 PE lines in EPI readout) were
utilized. Diffusion weighting was applied in three orthogonal directions (S/I,
A/P, R/L) with $$$ b = 500 \frac{s}{mm^2} $$$ . Other imaging parameters were: 0.9 x 0.9 mm2 in-plane resolution, FOV= 18x4.5cm2, 4 mm
slice thickness, 6 slices, TE = 51.3 ms, TR = 3600 ms, NEX = 16 averages, total
scan time of 3 min 52 sec.
K-space data from each slice
and each coil were extracted and processed individually with a custom image reconstruction
routine implemented in MATLAB. 16 repetitions (NEX) of this data (each with low
SNR) were first phase corrected using a refocusing reconstruction 6 using the
fully-sampled central 12.5% of k-space data. After this preprocessing step, five
different reconstruction methods were compared:
a)Each repetition is processed with a POCS algorithm for partial k-space
reconstruction 7. Absolute value average of the resulting images is taken
(Fig. 2a).
b) Image from (a) is denoised via an optimized non-local-means (NLM) filter 8,9 (Fig. 2b).
c) A complex averaging is performed in k-space, followed by a POCS algorithm
for partial k-space reconstruction (Fig. 2c).
d) Image from (c) is denoised via an optimized NLM filter (Fig. 2d).
e) Proposed method: Phase-corrected complex-valued
images are processed with a modified NLM filter: 16 repetitions are
concatenated in image domain, and the search volume (11x11 pixels) for finding
similar neighborhoods (3x3 pixels) is expanded to include the corresponding
positions in the repetition images. This modification significantly improves
the performance of NLM with minimal increase in reconstruction time. Resulting images
are deconcatenated, individually processed by a POCS algorithm for partial
k-space reconstruction, and averaged to form the final image. This process is
outlined in Fig. 1 and the resulting image is shown in Fig. 2e.
For NLM filters, the tuning
parameter that determines the noise vs. resolution trade-off is automatically
set using the method described in 9, without user intervention.
Results & Discussion
Figure 2 shows the results
of the proposed image reconstruction, in comparison with four alternative
techniques. As seen in Fig. 2a, in case of low SNR, absolute value averaging
causes an accumulation of noise in the background, which makes it difficult to
distinguish low SNR regions in the inferior parts of the cervical spinal cord
(blue arrow). A subsequent NLM filter fails to relieve this problem (Fig. 2b). The
complex averaged image in Fig. 2c, on the other hand, suffers from signal
cancellations (red arrows). Note that these signal cancellations appear despite
the prior refocusing algorithm, which can only fix slowly varying phase terms. Local
and rapid phase variations on the spinal cord could be a manifestation of the motion around the spinal cord due to CSF pulsation, or oscillatory
spinal cord motion synchronized to cardiac cycle
10. This artifact is especially problematic, as
it can be mistaken for an increased diffusion region on the spinal cord. A
subsequent NLM filter fails to correct the signal cancellation problem (Fig.
2d). Finally in Fig. 2e, the proposed method does not suffer from signal
cancellations, as local phase variations are detected and dealt with using the
modified NLM filter. Furthermore, background noise level is significantly reduced,
enhancing the depiction of the inferior parts of the cervical spinal cord.
Conclusion
We demonstrated a
multi-stage image reconstruction algorithm that combines phase correction with
a modified non-local-means (NLM) filter performed on complex-valued images.
This method visibly improves the image SNR, while avoiding signal
cancellations.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by
the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey through TUBITAK
3501 Grants (114E167, 114E546) , by the European Commission through FP7 Marie
Curie Career Integration Grants (PCIG13-GA-2013-618834, PCIG13-GA-2013-618101),
by the European Molecular Biology Organization Installation Grant (IG3028) and
by the Turkish Academy of Sciences through TUBA-GEBIP 2015 program.References
1. A. Anderson and J. Gore, "Analysis and correction of
motion artifacts in diffusion weighted imaging," Magnetic Resonance
in Medicine, no. 32, p. 379–387, 1994
2. EU. Saritas, C. Cunningham, J. Lee, E. Han and D.
Nishimura, "DWI of the spinal cord with reduced FOV single-shot
EPI," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, no. 60, p. 468–473, 2008.
3. G. Zaharchuk, EU. Saritas, J. Andre, C. Chin, J.
Rosenberg, T. Brosnan, A. Shankaranarayanan, D. Nishimura and N. Fischbein,
"Reduced field-of-view diffusion imaging of the human spinal cord:
comparison with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging," Am J
Neuroradiol, no. 32, p. 813–820, 2011
4. J. Andre, EU. Saritas, G. Zaharchuk, J. Rosenberg, S.
Komakula, S. Banerjee, A. Shankaranarayanan, D. Nishimura and N. Fischbein,
"Clinical evaluation of reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted
imaging of the cervical and thoracic spine and spinal cord," Am J
Neuroradiol, no. 33, p. 1860–1866, 2012.
5. EU. Saritas, D. Lee, T. Cukur, A. Shankaranarayanan and
D. Nishimura, "Hadamard Slice Encoding for Reduced-FOV
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, no.
72, pp. 1277-1290, 2014.
6. K. Miller and J. Pauly, "Nonlinear phase correction
for navigated diffusion imaging," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, no.
50, pp. 343-353, 2003.
7. E. Haacke, E. Lindskogj and W. Lin, "A fast,
iterative, partial-fourier technique capable of local phase recovery,"
J Magn Reson, no. 92, pp. 126-145, 1991.
8. A. Buades, B. Coll and J. M. Morel, "A review of
image denoising algorithms, with a new one," Multiscale Modeling
& Simulation, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 490-530, 2005.
9. P. Coupe, P. Yger, S. Prima, P. Hellier and C. Kervrann,
"An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising Filter for 3-D
magnetic resonance images," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.
4, no. 27, pp. 425-41, 2008.
10. D. Mikulis, M. Wood, O. Zerdoner and P. B, "Oscillatory
motion of the normal cervical spinal cord," Radiology, no. 192,
pp. 117-121, 1994.