Ganna Blazhenets1,2, Farida Grinberg1,3, Ezequiel Farrher1, Xiang Gao1, Mikheil Kelenjeridze4, Tamo Xechiashvili4, and N. Jon Shah1,3
1Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany, 2Institute of Nuclear Physics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 3Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, JARA, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, 4Department of Physics, Georgian Technical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
Synopsis
We compare the
sensitivity and applicability of two methods for the estimation of mean
kurtosis in a multi-sectional,
anisotropic diffusion phantom using conventional diffusion kurtosis imaging and
a fast protocol for rapid mean kurtosis metric estimation suggested by Hansen
et al. (2013). Both methods provide similar image quality and it can be
concluded that fast estimation of mean kurtosis is a useful tool that can be
used as a fast method for clinical applications. An interesting finding of this
work is a stronger dependence of fast computed kurtosis metrics on the
orientation of fibres with respect to the static magnetic field than of
the conventional method.Target
Audience
Two
methods for measuring diffusional kurtosis images were compared regarding
their perfomance using an anisotropic synthetic fibre phantom. Our results can be
of interest for researchers investigating water
diffusion properties in biological tissues.
Purpose
Diffusion magnetic
resonance imaging is widely recognized to be a unique, powerful and
non-invasive technique for fibrous tissue microstructure investigation,
particularly the human brain. Usually, water diffusion in biological tissues is
quantified via diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), which uses a Gaussian
approximation for the probability distribution of molecular displacements.
However, the displacement probability distribution can considerably deviate
from the Gaussian form for increasing diffusion weightings ($$$b$$$-values). The propagation of water
molecules is impeded by interaction with tissue components, confinements,
anisotropy, and is modulated by interfacial interactions with the cell
membranes. Due to the heterogeneity and complexity of the tissue
microstructure, the various contributions to the average MRI signal in
in vivo studies cannot be easily separated
from each other. Estimation of the next term in the cumulant expansion of the
MRI signal, proportional to the so-called kurtosis, has lately become a popular
method to quantify diffusion beyond the Gaussian information offered by DTI. Diffusional
mean kurtosis (MK) was suggested to be a sensitive marker for tissue pathology,
although, it requires longer acquisition times compared to DTI. A robust and
rapid method for estimating MK, with a protocol adapted on commercial scanners,
was proposed by Hansen et al.
1, and proved to be feasible in
clinical use. Several recent studies demonstrated its reproducibility,
comparable to the usually obtained MK metrics, in the rat and human brain, as
biomarker for glioma subtypes
2. The primary purpose of this study
was to perform a comparative analysis of the mean kurtosis metrics, obtained
with a conventional and a fast protocol for a highly anisotropic medium with a
well-known structure, such as a synthetic phantom and to investigate the effect
of self-induced susceptibility gradients at different orientations on of the
fibres in the static magnetic field.
Materials and methods
The construction of a
fibre phantom with a fibre-density gradient region is described in Ref
3.
Imaging was performed on a whole-body 3T Siemens MAGNETOM Trio Scanner
(Siemens, Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) using a 12 channel phased-array
receive head coil. Diffusion-weighted images were measured with the fibre axis
oriented at three angles with the static magnetic field: parallel (0°),
perpendicular (90°) and at 45°. The double-refocused diffusion-weighted spin-echo
EPI pulse sequence was used for acquiring the signal over 64 field gradient directions.
For the fast protocol only 13 diffusion-weighted images (described in
Ref.
1) were acquired for three $$$b$$$-values
(0, 1000 and 2500 s/mm2). The bias in the diffusion-weighted images
due to the background noise was corrected using the power-images method
4.
Conventional DKI parameter maps were computed with ExploreDTI
5 for
conventional kurtosis imaging and with the help of in-house Matlab scripts
(Matlab, The MathWorks) for fast DKI. The number of averages for fast kurtosis
was 20 in order to equal the number of diffusion-weighted volumes in
conventional DKI experiments.
Results and discussions
Fig.1 shows a
comparison of the conventional MK metric and the fast mean kurtosis parameter, $$$\bar{W}$$$, in two structurally different platforms of the
phantom. The phantom was positioned in such a way that the fibers were aligned
at 45 degrees to the main magnetic field. One can see a similar quality for the
images in both methods with minor detectable differences. Fig.1(c) presents a quantitative comparison of
the data in both platforms as scatter plots. In voxel by voxel comparison we
clearly observe significant correlations between the two maps. However, the
spread of points around the $$$MK = \bar{W}$$$ identity line is larger than that reported for
brain
1, probably due to the larger anisotropic effects of the
synthetic fibers. Fig.2 demonstrates the same quantitative and qualitative
comparison of both DKI methods for two platforms in the phantom. Here, the phantom
was positioned perpendicularly to the direction of a static magnetic field.
According to a strong dependence of absorption ability of fibers on the
orientation to magnetic field, we see a lower quality of the maps computed by
fast kurtosis method in this orientation.
Conclusion
The close correspondence of new measure $$$\bar{W}$$$ of kurtosis with the conventional MK was investigated
for an anisotropic synthetic phantom. Fast estimation of diffusion kurtosis
metric has the potential to constitute a useful tool for kurtosis imaging and
become a beneficial microstructural biomarker. We also
observed a strong dependence of the image quality on the orientation of fibers
with respect to the magnetic field, that is, the fast method is sensitive to
the susceptibility differences arising at interfaces.
Acknowledgements
References
1. B. Hansen, T. Lund, R. Sangill, S. Jespersen,
Experimentally and computationally fast method for estimation of a mean
kurtosis, Magn. Reson. Med. 00:000-000 (2013); 2. A. Tietze, B. Hansen et al.,
Diffusional Kurtosis in Patients with Glioma: Initial Results with a Fast
Imaging Method in a Clinical Setting, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015
Aug;36(8):1472-8; 3. E. Farrher, J. Kaffanke, A.A. Celik, T. Stocker, F.
Grinberg, N.J. Shah, Novel multisection design of anisotropic diffusion
phantoms, Magn. Reson. Imaging, 30 (2012) 518-526; 4. Miller, A.J.,
Joseph, P.M., The use of power images to perform quantitative analysis
on low SNR MR images. Magn. Reson. Imaging 11,
1051–1056. 5.Leemans
A, Jeurissen B, Sijbers J, and Jones DK. ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for
processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data.17th Annual Meeting of
Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, p. 3537, 2009