Ahmad Joman Alghamdi1,2, Hari K Ramachandran3, Ian M Brereton1, and Nyoman D Kurniawan1
1Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2College of Health Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia, 3Computer Science and Engineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur, India
Synopsis
DTI has been used to measure changes in spinal
cord WM, but lacks the specificity in measuring changes in GM and axonal
diameter. This study aims to apply NODDI and AxCaliber techniques to measure
characteristics of the lumbar spine in C57BL/6 mice, in-vivo at 9.4T and ex-vivo
at 16.4T. The GM orientation distribution index is 3 times that of the WM, and the
correlation of ODI to FA is r=–0.9, P<<0.01 for GM and r=–0.56, P<<0.01
for WM. AxCaliber analysis determined WM axon diameter populations with an average
of 1.55±0.15mm (in-vivo);
and 1.37±0.20 mm (ex-vivo). Target audience
Neuroimaging researchers interested in
microstructural changes of neurological disease models that affect the mouse
spinal cord.
Purpose
Axons and dendrites, which are
collectively known as neurites, are cellular building units of the central
nervous system (CNS)1.
Axonal damage due to injury, autoimmune or neurodegenerative diseases can
affect sensory and/or motor functions which result in a dramatic impact on patient
quality of life and health outcomes 2.
Clinically, white matter (WM)
pathology has been investigated by MR diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to assess microstructural
changes. However, DTI indices alone are not adequate to describe changes in the
complex architecture of CNS tissue. Novel high-order diffusion MRI techniques,
such as Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) and
AxCaliber have been developed to provide distinct information to complement DTI.
NODDI provides neurite dispersion, neurite density and CSF measurements that are
important to characterise changes in GM1,3.
AxCaliber provides information about the axon diameter distribution of WM
tracts4. Until recently, such information was only accessible through
histological examination using invasive tissue biopsy.
This project aims to apply NODDI
and AxCaliber techniques to the in-vivo and ex-vivo imaging of mouse lumbar spinal cord at ultrahigh magnetic
fields. This study also assesses the feasibility and the sensitivity of these
techniques as a first step in the study of disease models that affect the spinal
cord.
Methods
MRI acquisition: Four control adult male mice (7 weeks old) were
imaged in-vivo using a 30cm 9.4T MRI scanner (Bruker Biospin, Ettlingen,
Germany) equipped with a rat head phase array receive/quadrature 86 mm coil and
BGA-S12 gradient (440mT/m). Ex-vivo imaging
was performed using a Bruker 16.4T vertical wide-bore microimaging system equipped
with a Micro2.5 gradient (1.5T/m) and 20 mm volume coil (M2M Imaging, Brisbane,
Australia). In-vivo NODDI experiments were acquired using the Stejskal-Tanner
diffusion Echo Planar Imaging (DWI-EPI), and DWI-Spin Echo images were acquired
ex-vivo. AxCaliber acquisition used stimulated-echo diffusion EPI (ST-DWI-EPI).
Three b-values of 750, 1500 and 3000 s/mm2
were used for NODDI, whereas AxCaliber employed 10-12 b-values with six incremented diffusion times from 15-100ms. Details
of acquisition parameters are shown in Table 1. The same slice positions were
used for in-vivo and ex-vivo NODDI and AxCaliber experiments starting
at vertebral level T11 and ending at L1 which is equal to the spinal level
L1-L6 4.
Image processing: NODDI was processed using the NODDI Matlab
toolbox developed by UCL 3.
DTI parameters were calculated using the b=1500
s/mm2 dataset. NODDI/DTI data was analysed using ROIs manually drawn
based on Sengul and Watson 5 gross anatomy of the mouse spinal cord (Figure
3).
AxCaliber data was processed using a custom program
written in Matlab as described by Assaf et
al 6. ROIs were drawn manually using regions similar
to those described by Assaf et al 7.
Results and discussion
NODDI: The relative amount of orientation diffusion dispersion (ODI),
axonal density (represented by intracellular volume fraction (ICVF)) and the
estimated isotropic diffusivity (ISO) within the extra axonal space are shown
in Figure 1. ODI showed high WM/GM
contrast, in which GM ODI values are three times the value of WM across all subjects (Figure
2), indicating a high degree of neurite dispersion in the GM compared to the
WM.
AxCaliber: Our protocol determined major peaks of axon
diameter populations of 0.25, 1.5 and 2.5 microns (in-vivo) and 0.5, 1.25 and 1.75 microns (ex-vivo) for various ROIs of the mouse lumbar spinal cord. The axon
diameter average in these ROIs were 1.55±0.15mm (in-vivo)
and 1.37±0.20 mm (ex-vivo) (Figure 4 bottom row). This difference
may be resulted from physiological motion in-vivo or fixation effects for ex-vivo samples.
Overall, our results appear similar to those reported for an
ex-vivo q-space imaging (QSI) study performed
to measure the mouse spinal cord axon diameter (Figure 4 top row) 8. At the cervical level C6 – C7, QSI
measurements showed high correlation with axon diameters obtained from
histology in the range 0.81-1.82 microns (ex-vivo).
Conclusion
We have successfully applied AxCaliber and NODDI protocols to measure axons diameter distribution
and tissue microstructure
in-vivo and
ex-vivo in the mouse lumbar spinal
cord. These measurements will be compared to histology to further validate these
findings.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from the Queensland NMR Network
and Australian National Imaging Facility. Ahmad Alghamdi is sponsored by Taif
University scholarship.References
1. Winston,
G.P., The potential role of novel
diffusion imaging techniques in the understanding and treatment of epilepsy.
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 2015. 5(2): p. 279-287.
2. Duval,
T., et al., In vivo mapping of human
spinal cord microstructure at 300 mT/m. NeuroImage, 2015. 118: p. 494-507.
3. Zhang,
H., et al., NODDI: practical in vivo
neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain.
Neuroimage, 2012. 61(4): p.
1000-1016.
4. Harrison,
M., et al., Vertebral landmarks for the
identification of spinal cord segments in the mouse. NeuroImage, 2013. 68(0): p. 22-29.
5. Sengul,
G. and C. Watson, Chapter 13 - Spinal
Cord, in The Mouse Nervous System,
C.W.P. Puelles, Editor. 2012, Academic Press: San Diego. p. 424-458.
6. Assaf,
Y., et al., Axcaliber: A method for
measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion MRI. Magnetic Resonance
in Medicine, 2008. 59(6): p.
1347-1354.
7. Assaf,
Y. and D.C. Alexander, Chapter 3.3 -
Advanced Methods to Study White Matter Microstructure, in Quantitative MRI of the Spinal Cord,
J.C.-A.A.M. Wheeler-Kingshott, Editor. 2014, Academic Press: San Diego. p.
156-163.
8. Ong,
H.H. and F.W. Wehrli, Quantifying axon
diameter and intra-cellular volume fraction in excised mouse spinal cord with
q-space imaging. NeuroImage, 2010. 51(4):
p. 1360-1366.