Silvia De Santis1, Yaniv Assaf2, and Derek Jones1
1Cardiff University, CUBRIC, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 2Department of Neurobiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Synopsis
With the increasing popularity of multi-shell diffusion techniques to
measure axonal density and diameter, the investigation of the exact origin of
the contrast has become a hot topic. Here, we investigate the impact of the
echo time in measuring the axonal density and show that the two water
compartments are characterised by a different relaxation time T2, making the
measures of the volume strongly dependent on the echo time. This suggests
caution when comparing data acquired with different setups and introduces a new
way of measuring the differential T2 properties of intra- and extra-axonal
water pools.PURPOSE:
The lack of specificity of diffusion tensor MRI
(DT-MRI) arises mainly from its inadequacy to characterise more than one fibre
population within a voxel and its implicit assumption of there being a single
tissue compartment. This has motivated the search for more sophisticated
approaches to modeling diffusion in complex tissue. Hybrid models like CHARMED
[1] and NODDI [2], expressing the signal as a summation over intra- and
extra-axonal compartments, have proven particularly useful in this context. The
intra-axonal volume fraction is often considered a proxy for the axonal
density. These frameworks have been extended to characterize axonal diameters
[3,4], providing the opportunity to non invasively map the distribution of
axonal calibres within the brain, increasing the specificity of diffusion MRI
even further. When measuring the signal coming from different water pools, one
assumes the T2 relaxation time of every pool to be the same; if that’s not the
case, the measured compartment fraction will be weighted by the corresponding
T2, and experiments performed with different echo times (TE) would return
different values for the axonal density (and, as a consequence, bias the
measures of the axonal diameter). Normally, TE is chosen automatically as the
minimum allowed by the sequence and is thus very likely to be different from
one scanner to the other. Here, we
investigate the influence of the echo time on the intra-axonal volume fraction
as measured with the CHARMED model.
METHODS:
1 rat underwent a diffusion MRI protocol at 9.4T
comprising a diffusion-weighted spin echo with b-value 1000 and 3000 s/mm2, 15
directions in each shell and 3 b=0 scans. The protocol was run with the TE
minimisation on, which gave TE=30ms and a single average. Then, a second protocol
was acquired with TE=50ms and 2 averages. Assuming an average T2 relaxation of
45ms [5], the increased number of averages compensates for the increased
attenuation to have the same SNR in the two scans. Data were analysed in native
space using custom software written in Matlab R2012b (The Mathworks) using
conventional DT-MRI and the CHARMED model, to generate maps of the fractional
anisotropy (FA) and of the intra-axonal volume fraction (FR), respectively.
Then, the FA maps were nonlinearly warped to a rat template in stereotaxic
coordinates [6] using FSL [7] and the same transformation was applied to the FR
maps. Mean values and associated standard deviations were calculated for 31
regions of interest (ROI) segmented on the template; then, for each ROI, the
difference between FA/FR calculated at the shortest TE and the same parameters
calculated at the longest TE was calculated.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
While FA does not show any particular trend for
increasing TE, FR shows a clear trend where all ROIs except 2 have largest FR
for the largest TE. Paired t-test confirms that FR mean values across all ROIs
calculated at different echo times are statistically different (p<0.01),
while FA values are not. The mean FR difference across all ROIs is -12%. This
is compatible with the intra-axonal water being proportionally less attenuated
for increasing TEs, i.e., a longer T2 for the intra-axonal water. In addition,
the difference between intra- and extra-axonal T2 relaxation times is
compatible with results obtained with other methods [8].
CONCLUSION:
The obtained results
indicate that 1) caution is needed when comparing results for the restricted
water fractions obtained using different sequences, or acquired in different
centres; and 2) T2 relaxation properties of intra- and extra-axonal water
pools, believed to be so similar to be indistinguishable, can be instead
accessed using diffusion. This can give access to a new kind of contrast that
has not been explored before: by collecting more datapoints, the full T2 decay
can be measured for the two pools. In areas of crossing fibres, there is also
potential to combine T2 relaxation with diffusion, as already done for T1
relaxation [9], to get fibre-specific values of T2. The acquisition of more
samples and more TEs is in progress.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Assaf and Basser MRM
52:965 (2004) [2] Zhang et al. NI
61:1000 (2012) [3] Assaf et al. MRM 59:1347
(2008) [4] Alexander et al. NI 52:1374 (2010) [5] de Graaf et al. MRM 56:386
(2006) [6] Paxinos and Watson, The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates,
Academic Press (2006) [7] Jenkinson
et al NeuroImage 62:782 (2012) [8] Dortch et al MRM 70:10 (2013) [9] De Santis et al MRM doi:10.1002/mrm.25644 (2015)