Jennifer C Wakefield1,2, Jessica M Winfield1,2, Veronica Morgan2, Alison MacDonald2, Susana Banerjee1,2, Andrew N Priest3, Rebecca A Quest4, Susan Freeman3, Andrea G Rockall4, and Nandita M deSouza1,2
1Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, 2The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom, 3Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 4Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Synopsis
The utility of Diffusion-weighted MRI
(DW-MRI) in defining response by volume reduction or for determining the
time-course of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes indicative of
response has not been evaluated in patients with relapsed ovarian or peritoneal
cancer. We evaluated post-treatment change in volume and ADC in lesions
classified by RECIST criteria as responders and non-responders. We found
responding lesions show greater change in volume and equivalent change in ADC
to non-responding lesions after one cycle of chemotherapy. In non-responding
lesions, the change in these parameters continued at the same rate post-first
cycle of chemotherapy, indicating a delayed response.BACKGROUND:
In advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), peritoneal and
omental deposits are often sub-centimetre, ill-defined or confluent in nature
on T
2-weighted imaging,
1 which
makes their response to chemotherapy difficult to assess by Response Evaluation
Criteria In Solid Tumours version 1.1 (RECIST) criteria. Preliminary
single-centre studies have demonstrated the potential role of DW-MRI in EOC,
not only because of its superior soft-tissue contrast in defining peritoneal disease
extent but also as a quantitative biomarker for early treatment response
assessment.
2,3 However, the utility of the technique has
not been exploited in relapsed disease for defining response by lesion volume
reduction or for determining the time-course of apparent diffusion coefficient
(ADC) changes indicative of response when re-challenged with platinum-based
chemotherapy.
PURPOSE:
To evaluate change in volume and ADC in lesions
classified by RECIST criteria as responding and non-responding in patients with
relapsed EOC or primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) re-challenged with
platinum-based chemotherapy.
METHODS:
Study protocol: 21 patients with relapsed EOC or PPC, scheduled to
receive platinum-based chemotherapy, were recruited from three institutions as
part of an ongoing prospective multi-centre clinical trial (DISCOVAR, NCRN
portfolio number 11182) and gave their written consent to participate. Each patient underwent an MRI prior
to commencement of chemotherapy and following their first and third cycles of
chemotherapy.
Imaging
protocol: Following administration of hyoscine
butylbromide (20mg i.m.), free-breathing axial single-shot echo-planar DW-MRI (b-values
0,100,500,900smm-2, slice thickness 6mm, pixel size 3x3mm) and
slice-matched T1-weighted and T2-weighted anatomical imaging
were acquired in the abdomen and pelvis on a 1.5T scanner.
Analysis:
Up to ten lesions were
analysed per patient using in-house software.4 Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn by region growing around
lesions (Figure 1) on consecutive computed high b-value axial DW-MRI images (b=1000smm-2
derived
from b-values:100,500,900smm-2) encompassing the whole lesion, generating a volume of interest (VOI).
The ROI included regions of impeded diffusion arising from residual tumor.
Cystic or necrotic areas were excluded by visual matching with the
morphological MRI sequences. ADC parameters (median, 25th percentile) and
volume of each lesion were calculated from the individual pixel ADC values and
total pixel number respectively within the VOI on the baseline and
post-treatment imaging. The post-treatment change after one and three cycles of
chemotherapy was expressed as percentage change from baseline or previous
cycle,
and paired t-tests were performed taking p<0.05 to indicate a statistically significant
difference. Per-lesion chemotherapeutic response was determined on the morphological
MR images at baseline and after three cycles of chemotherapy according to
RECIST criteria, whereby a reduction in longest diameter of at least 30%
denoted response.5 Per disease site ADC histograms in RECIST
responding and non-responding lesions were produced after summation of
individual pixel ADCs of all lesions falling into each disease site and response
group. The histograms were normalised for total disease burden to account for
changes in volume post-treatment.
RESULTS:
55 lesions were classified as responding
on RECIST (42 peritoneal nodules, 12 lymph nodes, 1 liver metastasis), and 28
as non-responding (25 peritoneal nodules, 3 lymph nodes). Three lesions were
non-measurable after the first cycle of chemotherapy, and a further nine were
non-measurable after the third cycle of chemotherapy and were excluded from the
analysis at these timepoints. Volume decrease after the first cycle of
chemotherapy was five-times greater in responding lesions than non-responding
lesions, this difference reduced to three-times after three cycles. The
percentage increase in median ADC after the first cycle of chemotherapy in
residual tumor from responding and non-responding lesions was equivalent. However,
the rate of volume reduction in responding lesions slowed after cycle one, and
ADC values in residual tumor did not change further. In contrast, the volume in
the non-responding lesions continued to decrease at the same rate between cycle
one and three and the level of ADC change in non-responding lesions was
sustained after three cycles of chemotherapy indicating a continued delayed response.
On histogram analysis, responding peritoneal disease showed a greater shift to
the right of the ADC histogram (Figure 2) than nodal disease (Figure 3).
DISCUSSION &
CONCLUSIONS:
In relapsed EOC/PPC, lesions classified as “responding” by RECIST criteria show
greater change in volume and equivalent change in ADC to RECIST “non-responding” lesions after one cycle of
chemotherapy. However, in “non-responding”
lesions, the change in these parameters continued at the same rate after the
first cycle of chemotherapy, indicating a delayed response. ADC histograms of
individual lesions may be a more sensitive biomarker of response in peritoneal
lesions than nodal disease and may be useful to evaluate differences in
site-specific response. DW-MRI may be useful in longitudinal studies to detect
platinum resistant lesions early.
Acknowledgements
We
acknowledge funding from CRUK in association with MRC and Department of Health
and NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and Clinical Research
Facility in Imaging.
We would like to thank
the radiographers at the three institutions who scanned the patients.References
[1] Nougaret S, Addley HC, Colombo PE, et al. Ovarian carcinomatosis:
how the radiologist can help plan the surgical approach. Radiographics. 2012 Oct; 32(6):1775-800.
[2] Kyriazi S, Collins D, Messiou C, et al.
Metastatic ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: assessing chemotherapy
response with diffusion-weighted MR imaging – value of histogram analysis of
apparent diffusion coefficients. Radiology. 2011; 261(1):182-192.
[3]
Sala E, Kataoka MY, Priest AN,
et al. Advanced ovarian cancer: multiparametric MR imaging demonstrates
response- and metastasis-specific effects. Radiology. 2012;263(1):149-59.
[4] Blackledge M, Leach M, Collins D, et al. Computed
diffusion-weighted MR imaging may improve tumour detection. Radiology. 2011;
261(2):573-581.
[5] Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent
D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised
RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45(2):228-47.