Utility of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient value for distinguishing pituitary atypical adenomas from typical adenomas
Mariko Doai1, Naoko Tsuchiya1, Hisao Tonami1, and Osamu Tachibana2

1Radiology, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Japan, 2Neurosurgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Japan

Synopsis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value for distinguishing pituitary atypical adenomas from typical adenomas. The ADC maps were reviewed using Ziostation2, and placed a 3D volume-of interest on the tumor. The entire tumor were computed. Histogram parameters were then compared between atypical adenomas (n=3) and typical adenomas (n=11). Skewness and kurtosis of ADC histogram were significantly lower for atypical adenoma as compared with typical adenoma. ADC histogram analysis on the basis of the entire tumor volume can be useful in distinguishing atypical adenomas from typical adenomas.

Purpose

Pituitary atypical adenomas have been referred to have aggressive behavior, such as invasiveness and high rate of recurrence (1,2). From a clinical point of view, preoperative discrimination between atypical adenomas and typical adenomas is important. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value for distinguishing pituitary atypical adenomas from typical adenomas (3,4,5).

Method

Between 2012 and 2015 , eighteen patients with pituitary macroadenoma underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (TR/TE, 2500/66ms; b values, 0 and 1000 sec/mm2) and corresponding ADC maps were obtained. Among them, four cases with extensive cystic or hemorrhagic changes were excluded from the analysis. In all cases, pathological confirmations including immunohistochemical examination were obtained from the surgically resected specimen. The ADC maps were reviewed using Ziostation2 (Ziosoft Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and placed a 3D volume-of interest (VOI) on the tumor superimposing contrast enhanced MR images (Figure 1). All ADC values were within in the VOI were used to compute the average ADC within the tumor. The ADC values were binned to construct the histogram. Using the histogram mean, mimimum,maximum, quartile, skewness, kurtosis, and percentile ( 5th,10th,25th,50th,75th, 90th,95th ) of ADC of the entire tumor were computed. Histogram parameters were then compared between atypical adenomas (n=3) and typical adenomas (n=11).

Results

Skewness and kurtosis of ADC histogram were significantly lower for atypical adenoma as compared with typical adenoma ( 0.118 ± 0.493 vs 1.419 ± 0.556×10-6 mm2/sec, P=0.011; 0.720 ± 0.948 vs 3.479 ± 1.353×10-6 mm2/sec, P=0.011, respectively). No significant differences of ADC histogram were found at other parameters (Table 1). Figure 1 show the representative cases.

Discussion and Conclusion

The present study showed that histogram parameters including skeweness and kurtosis had additional value for distinguishing pituitary atypical adenomas from typical adenomas. Skewness and kurtosis describe the degree asymmetry and sharpness of a histogram, respectively. We hypothesize that the diffusion pattern of the water molecules is more heterogenous and more non-Gaussian in atypical adenomas than in typical adenomas.

In conclusion, ADC histogram analysis on the basis of entire tumor volume can be useful in distinguishing atypical adenomas from typical adenomas.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1.Zada G, Woodmansee WW, Ramkissoon S, et al. Atypical pituitary adenomas:incidence, clinical characteristics,and implications. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:336-344

2. Matsuno A, Murakami M, Hoya K, et al. Molecular status of pituitary carcinoma and atypical adenoma that contributes the effectiveness of temozolomide. Med Mol Morphol. 2014;47:1-7

3.Mahmoud OM, Tominaga A, Amatya VJ, et al. Role of PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the evaluation of pituitary adenomas. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:412-417

4. Mohamed FF, Abouhashen S. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in assessment of pituitary macroadenoma cosistency. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine.2013;44:617-624

5.Pierallini A, Caramia F, Falcone C, et al. Pituitary macroadenomas:Preoperative evaluation of consistency with diffusion-weighted MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology. 2006;239:223-231

Figures

Table 1. ADC histogram parameters of atypical pituitary adenomas and typical pituitary adenomas. The mean values of difference in the imaging parameters were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test . * Statistically significant with P<0.05

Figure 1. (A)Atypical adenoma (B) Typical adenoma

Histogram analysis data of ADC maps were obtained by fusing in contrast enhancing VOIs from MR imaging examinations with ADC maps. 3D image of only extracted tumor (C) ADC histogram of atypical adenoma (D) ADC histogram of typical adenoma




Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1985