Dal Mo Yang1, Hyun Cheol Kim1, Sang Won Kim1, and Geon-Ho Jahng1
1Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
Accurate assessment
of prostate cancer aggressiveness is important for deciding treatment strategy. Functional MRI sequences such as DWI and DCE have been shown to provide
information about tumor aggressiveness. Patients with high Gleason
scores exhibited lower ADC values. In this study, we evaluated the potential of IVIM imaging to predict histologic prognostic
parameters by investigating whether various IVIM parameters correlate with the Gleason
score. The result indicates D is the
best IVIM parameter for discriminating prostate cancers with low GS from
prostate cancers with intermediate or high GS.
Introduction
Prostate cancer is
the second most common cancer among men worldwide; moreover, the incidence of
prostate cancer is rising in Asia and Eastern Europe. The accurate
assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness is important for deciding the most
appropriate initial treatment strategy. The Gleason score is an important
preoperative predictor of response to treatment and patient outcomes. However,
biopsy determination of the Gleason grade is invasive and often does not accurately
reflect the final Gleason score. Recently,
functional MRI sequences such as DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)
imaging have been shown to provide information about tumor aggressiveness.
The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is negatively correlated with the Gleason
score for prostate cancer. Specifically, patients with high Gleason
scores have tumors with lower ADCs. This relationship is likely because tumors
with high Gleason scores exhibit increased cellularity.Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MR
imaging quantitatively assesses the microscopic translational motion that occurs
in each image voxel on MR imaging scans. Both pure molecular diffusion
(D) and microcirculation-related
diffusion, otherwise known as pseudodiffusion (D*), can be distinguished using IVIM MR imaging, as can the blood
flow fraction (f). Recent
studies with IVIM imaging showed that reduced ADCs for prostate cancer are due to
decreased molecular diffusion and to a decreased perfusion fraction. However,
studies on the relationship between IVIM parameters and Gleason scores are rare. Therefore,
this study evaluated the potential of IVIM imaging to predict histological and prognostic
parameters by investigating whether IVIM parameters correlated with Gleason
score.
Materials and Methods
The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and informed consent was waived. A total of 41 patients with histologically proven prostate cancer who underwent prostate MR imaging using a 3T MRI machine were included. For 8 DWI b-values (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 800 sec/mm2), a spin-echo echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence was performed. D, f, D*, and ADCfit values were compared among three groups of patients with prostate cancer: Gleason score 6 (n = 9), 7 (n = 16), or 8 or higher (n = 16). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for D, f, D*, and ADCfit to assess the ability of each parameter to distinguish cancers with low Gleason scores from cancers with intermediate or high Gleason scores.
Reslts
Pearson’s coefficient analysis revealed significant negative correlations between Gleason score and ADCfit (r = -0.490, P = 0.001) and Gleason score and D values (r = -0.514, P = 0.001). Gleason score was poorly correlated with f (r = 0.168, P = 0.292) and D* values (r = -0.108, P = 0.500). The ADCfit and D values of prostate cancers with Gleason scores 7 or 8 were significantly lower than values for prostate cancers with Gleason score 6 (P < 0.05). ROC curves were constructed to assess the ability of IVIM parameters to discriminate prostate cancers with Gleason score 6 from cancers with Gleason scores 7 or 8. Areas under the curve were 0.671 to 0.974. ADCfit and D yielded the highest Az value (0.960–0.956), whereas f yielded the lowest Az value (0.633).To optimize the diagnostic accuracy of each parameter, cutoff values of ADCfit < 1.29 x 10-3 mm2/s, D < 1.18 x 10-3 mm2/s, D* < 27.97 x 10-3 mm2/s, and f < 18.42% were used.
Conclusions
ADCfit and D strongly correlated with Gleason scores for prostate cancer. The best IVIM parameter for discriminating prostate cancers with low Gleason scores from cancers with intermediate or high Gleason scores was D, which expresses pure molecular diffusion.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
Shinmoto H, Tamura C, Soga S, Shiomi E,
Yoshihara N, Kaji T, et al. An intravoxel incoherent motion
diffusion-weighted imaging study of prostate
cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:W496-500.
Pang Y, Turkbey B, Bernardo M, Kruecker J,
Kadoury S, Merino ML, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR
imaging for prostate cancer: an
evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from
different b-value combinations. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:553-62.
Döpfert J, Lemke A, Weidner A, Schad LR. Investigation of prostate cancer using
diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29:1053-8.
Kuru TH, Roethke MC, Stieltjes B, Maier-Hein
K, Schlemmer HP, Hadaschik BA, et al. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Diffusion Imaging in Prostate Cancer - What Does It Add?
J Comput Assist Tomogr 2014;38:558-64.
Zhang YD, Wang Q, Wu CJ, Wang XN, Zhang J,
Liu H, et al. The histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted intravoxel
incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging for differentiating the Gleason grade of
prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 2015;25:994-1004.