Reducing Time Samples Needed for MR Elastography
Roger Grimm1, Jun Chen1, and Richard Ehman1

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States

Synopsis

A 3D gradient recalled echo sequence has been developed that samples the three shear wave displacement polarization at 3 time points for a total of 9 image samples. A multi-coil recon generates phase difference images and then uses a 3 point discrete Fourier transform to provide the complex displacement fields. The sequence is shown in breast and head applications.

Purpose

The purpose of this work is to develop a 3D MR Elastography pulse sequence that minimizes the acquisition samples needed for 3 displacement polarizations while also minimizing image artifacts. The complex wave fields sampled for Elastography contain 3 unknowns in the acquired phase. There is a static term and an in-phase and out-of-phase term for the wave field. These 3 unknowns require 3 samples for each of the 3 displacement fields, thus a total of 9 samples are needed. This approaches the 8 samples used for tetrahedral acquisition schemes and, more recently, SLIM-MRE1. Additionally, acquisitions using 2D SE-EPI (Spin Echo Echo Planar Imaging) are increasingly being used for 3D processing. The data from EPI scans have periodic slice-to-slice phase artifacts. These artifacts require filtering2 and can reduce the apparent stiffness. This work uses a 3D GRE (Gradient Recalled Echo) to sample the displacement fields. Given the 3D nature of the acquisition, no filtering is needed.

Methods

Previously3, a 3D GRE sequence using 4 time points and 12 total samples was presented. This work extends this technique to 3 time points. The sequence does not invert the MEG (motion encoding gradients) gradients and instead uses the TR to advance the phase of the complex displacement field. The timing schedule of the acquisition is seen in figure 1. The image reconstruction of the 3 phase difference images follows the standard vascular reconstruction5 for a multi-coil data set and is schematically seen in figure 2. When a phase difference is calculated for time samples 180° apart, the phase values double. However, when the samples are separated by 120° the increase is $$$\sqrt{3}$$$. To preserve scaling of the phase to physical motion, this difference is noted in the reported MENC values. After phase unwrapping, a 3 point discrete Fourier transform can then be used to generate the complex displacement field. If a vector curl is applied during processing, a static phase term needs to be removed from the y and z encoded fields due to there relative shift in the complex plane. The constant $$$e^{-iN2\pi/9}$$$ is multiplied to the y encoded field, where N is the number of motions cycles covering the 9 acquired samples. Twice the phase is multiplied to the z encoded field.

Results

Mayo Clinic IRB approved scans were obtained of head and breast anatomy. Scans were performed on a GE 3.0T scanner. The breast MRE parameters used a fat/water in-phase TE/TR= 18.176/22.2, mechanical vibration=40Hz, a fractional 1-2-1 MEG pulse for flow compensation, MENC=12.3μm/rad, FOV=380x380x160mm, acquisition size=96x96x40, resolution=4x4x4mm, flip angle=8, ARC phase reduction factor=2, scan time=5:39minutes. The results are seen in figure 3. The breast scans show ample wave sensitivity and image quality. Reducing the needed samples to 9 allows for full coverage in a reasonable scan time of 5:39.

The head 3D sagittal GRE scan parameters TE/TR= 28.4/35.2, mechanical vibration=60Hz, a 1.43 cycle MEG pulse that provides flow compensation, MENC=11.5μm/rad, FOV=220x220x180mm, acquisition size=74x74x60, resolution=3x3x3mm, flip angle=12, 2D ARC reduction=2x2, scan time=6:46minutes. The GRE head scan was compared to 2D axial EPI parameters of TE/TR= 62.3/3601, mechanical vibration=60Hz, two 1-2-1 MEG pulses, MENC=6.5μm/rad, FOV=240x240x144mm, acquisition size=74x74x48, resolution=3.2x3.2x3mm, ASSET reduction=3, scan time=6:47minutes. The comparison is seen in figure 4. In the head application the EPI scans show residual banding artifact in the sagittal reformatted images even after processing to remove them. These bands would appear as high frequency shear waves to inversion algorithms and result in reduced apparent stiffness estimates. The GRE scans show no slice-to-slice banding in the reformatted axial images. While the GRE scans showed reasonable penetration, the sensitivity to motion and SNR were limited.

Conclusions

Tetrahedral sampling strategies and SLIM-MRE can acquire all three displacement fields in 8 samples. However, as noted previously5, imaging and MEG gradients can cause table motion and induce shear waves in the body. The three repeating pulse sequence acquisition units, x-y-z, are only updated for phase encoding throughout the scan. This provides the same motion history, including induced table motion, and MEG induced eddy currents for all samples of a given polarization. This should be seen in a flatter divergence field compared to other minimum sample strategies.

The GRE sequence is the sequence of choice in our current breast studies. The head scans were performed using gradients with a maximum performance of 4 Gauss/cm. It would be desirable to use higher performance gradients with the GRE sequence. This would allow for both lower TE times and higher sensitivity to motion.

Acknowledgements

Grant EB001981

References

1. Klatt D, et al. Sample interval modulation for the simultaneous acquisition of displacement vector data in magnetic resonance elastography: theory and application. Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58(24): 8663–8675.

2. Murphy M, et al. Measuring the Characteristic Topography of Brain Stiffness with Magnetic Resonance Elastography. PLoS One. 2013;8(12): doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081668.

3. Grimm R, et al. Matching Motion Sensitivity with TE and TR in Elastography for Faster Scans. Proc ISMRM. 2013; 2446.

4. Bernstein M, et al. Reconstructions of Phase Contrast, Phased Array Multicoil Data. MRM. 1994; 32:330-334.

5. Gallichan D, et al. TREMR: Table-Resonance Elastography with MR. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2009; 62:815–821.

Figures

figure 1: Schedule to play out the 3 displacement polarizations. By interleaving the 3 directions as seen in a), the samples will distribute equally around the complex plane providing the needed phase advance b). The integer multiple, N, must not be a multiple of 3 to prevent the phases from collapsing on themselves and providing no phase advance.

figure 2: Phase difference generation for 3 phases is generalized from the 4 phase case.The 4 phase case is seen in a) where samples 180° apart are used to generate the phase difference. For 3 phases, successive sample are used in a circular fashion b).

figure 3: Comparison of 4 phase samples with 3 phase samples. The reduced time samples for the 3 phase scan allowed more slices to completely cover the breast in the same scan time.

figure 4: Comparison of 2D SE-EPI and 3 phase 3D GRE. Both have been reformatted to display the acquired slice direction. Red arrows point out the residual banding artifacts that remain in the SE-EPI images despite the correction process to remove the slice-to-slice phase variations.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1954