Image-based estimation of point spread function in distorted EPI images
Seiji Kumazawa1, Takashi Yoshiura2, Akihiro Kikuchi1, Go Okuyama1, Daisuke Shimao1, and Masataka Kitama1

1Hokkaido University of Science, Sapporo, Japan, 2Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan

Synopsis

To correct the distortion in EPI due to field inhomogeneity, the information regarding the signal from adjacent points within each voxel is needed. The PSF approach can provide this information. Our purpose was to develop an image-based-method for estimating the PSF images in the distorted EPI image using T1WI. Our method synthesizes the distorted image to match the measured EPI image through the generation process of EPI image according to a single-shot EPI k-space trajectory and field inhomogeneity. The results demonstrate that the PSF image for each voxel in distorted EPI image can be estimated by proposed method using segmented T1WI instead of additional acquisitions for PSF measurement.

PURPOSE

Echo-planar imaging (EPI) suffers from geometric distortion due to magnetic field inhomogeneity. Among the distortion correction methods, the most commonly used method is the field map based approach, which provides the one-to-one correspondence relationship between points in the original space and the distortion image.1 However, the relationship between the original and the distorted space is not one-to-one but many-to-one.2 To correct the distortion, the information on the contribution to signal from adjacent points within each voxel is needed. The point spread function (PSF) approach can provide the information of the signal contribution of a voxel for the neighboring voxels because this approach can obtain the PSF imagefor each voxel.3,4 However, this approach needs long scan time.5 In this study, our purpose was to develop a novel image-based method for estimating the PSF images in the distorted EPI image using T1 weighted image (T1WI).

METHODS

Our basic idea for estimating the PSFs in EPI is to reproduce the distorted EPI image based on MR imaging physics. Our method synthesized the distorted image to match the measured EPI image through the generation process of EPI image according to a single-shot EPI k-space trajectory and field inhomogeneity. The field inhomogeneity was estimated by the image-based method6 using segmented T1WI. To synthesize the distorted EPI image, an MR signal was simulated on a voxel-by-voxel basis based on the tissue in segmented T1WI. The MR signal in the presence of field inhomogeneity ΔB is given by $$S(k_{m},k_{n},\Delta B)=A\sum_{i=0}^{M\times N-1}K_i (k_{m},k_{n})\cdot D_i (k_{m},k_{n},\Delta B_i) \hspace{95pt} [1],$$where Ki and Di are given by $$K_i (k_{m},k_{n}) = \rho_i \cdot \exp \left\{-\frac{TE+m \Delta t_x + n \Delta t_y}{ T_{2i}} \right\} \cdot \exp \left\{ -j2 \pi (k_m x_i + k_n y_i)\right \}\hspace{3pt} [2]$$ $$D_i (k_{m},k_{n}, \Delta B_i) = \exp \left\{-j 2 \pi \left( \frac{k_m}{ G_x} + \frac{k_n}{G_y} \right) \Delta B_i\right\}\hspace{110pt} [3].$$Ki represents the contrast and position information of the tissue in voxel i, and corresponds to the k-space data from a single voxel without field inhomogeneity. Di represents the field inhomogeneity in voxel i causing the distortion, and corresponds to the Fourier Transform of the PSF.3 The synthesized EPI image was reconstructed by taking the 2-D inverse Fourier Transform of S. The field inhomogeneity was estimated by minimizing the least-square cost function using the synthesized EPI image and the measured EPI image. By taking the inverse Fourier Transform of Di calculated from the estimated field inhomogeneity map, we obtained the PSF image for each voxel. The spin echo (SE) EPI and T1WI data of a healthy volunteer were acquired using a 1.5-tesla clinical scanner (Magnetom, Symphony, Siemens) with an 8-channel phased-array coil. The SE EPI data was obtained by a single-shot EPI pulse sequence (FOV: 230 mm, TR=8600ms, TE=119ms, 128×128 in-plane resolution, 3 mm thickness). Three dimensional T1WI covering the same area in EPI was obtained by MPRAGE sequence (FOV: 230 mm, TR=2090ms, TE=3.93ms, TI=1100ms, FA=15°, 256×256 in-plane resolution, 1 mm thickness).


RESULTS

Figure 1(a, b and c) shows the measured SE EPI image from a healthy volunteer, the synthesized EPI image by our proposed method, and the absolute difference image between them, respectively. The estimated field map by the image-based method6 is shown in Fig. 1 (d). The image shown in Fig.2a was reconstructed by the sum of the signals from i=0 to the middle of the total voxels in Eq. [1]. It can be seen that a signal from a voxel affects the neighboring voxels. Figure 2b shows the examples of the PSFs in the voxels of the synthesized EPI image shown in Fig.2a.

DISCUSSION

The synthesized EPI image by our proposed method (Fig. 1b) was very similar to the measured EPI image (Fig. 1a). Figure 1 (c) demonstrates that our method can produce a reasonable synthesized EPI image using the estimated field inhomogeneity map (Fig. 1d). As shown in Fig. 2, our method can obtain the PSF image for each voxel. Each PSF image provides the information regarding the intensity distribution and the displacement of the voxel center due to the field inhomogeneity. Based on the PSF images obtained by our method, it could be possible to correct the geometrical distortion in EPI image using an appropriate deconvolution procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed an image-based estimation method for the PSF images in the distorted EPI image using the segmented T1WI and the field inhomogeneity map estimated by the image-based method. Our results demonstrate that the PSF image for each voxel in distorted EPI image can be estimated by our method using segmented T1WI instead of additional acquisitions for PSF measurement.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 15K08695 and 26293278.

References

1.Jezzard P, Balaban RS. 1995. Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations. Magn Reson Med 34:65-73.

2.Jones DK, Cercignani M. 2010. Twenty-five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data. NMR Biomed. 23:803-820.

3.Robson MD, Gore JC, Constable RT. 1997. Measurement of the point spread function in MRI using constant time imaging. Magn Reson Med. 38:733-40.

4.Zeng H, Constable RT. 2002. Image distortion correction in EPI: comparison of field mapping with point spread function mapping. Magn Reson Med. 48:137-146.

5.Holland D, Kuperman JM, Dale AM. 2010. Efficient correction of inhomogeneous static magnetic field-induced distortion in Echo Planar Imaging. Neuroimage. 50:175-183.

6.Kumazawa S, Yoshiura T, Honda H. 2015. Image-based estimation method for field inhomogeneity in brain echo-planar images with geometric distortion using k-space textures, Concept Magn Reson B. 45:142-152.

Figures

Figure 1: (a) Measured SE EPI image from a healthy volunteer, (b) the synthesized EPI image by our proposed method, (c) the absolute difference image between the measured and the synthesized EPI images, and (d) the estimated field map by the image-based method6.

Figure 2: (a) The synthesized EPI image from data of the sum of the signals from i=0 to the middle of the total voxels, and (b) the examples of the PSFs in the voxels of the synthesized EPI image shown in (a).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1916