Mohammed Goryawala1, Bhaswati Roy2, Rakesh K Gupta2, and Andrew A Maudsley1
1Department of Radiology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurgaon, India
Synopsis
Calculated
differences between two images of differing T1 or T2 contrasts, or subtraction
images, have been presented as a way to improve image contrast for imaging of
brain tumors. In this study the performance of subtraction images for differentiation
of tumor, edema, and normal appearing white matter (NAWM) is compared to traditionally
acquired anatomic MRIs, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), perfusion weighted
imaging (PWI) and MR spectroscopy imaging (MRSI). Results showed a significant
increase in contrast for differentiating between enhancing tumor and edematous
regions from NAWM using the ΔT1 map and ΔT2 map, respectively, as compared to
other parametric maps. Purpose
Primary aim of
this study was to assess if subtraction maps generated using CE T1-weighted,
non-enhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted images offered better contrast in
differentiating tumor and edema from normal appearing white matter (NAWM) as compared
to traditionally acquired anatomic, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), perfusion
weighted imaging (PWI) and MR spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) sequences.
Methods
The study
involved retrospective data analysis of 46 subjects with untreated gliomas
histologically verified with World Health Organization classifications of grade
II (n = 18), III (n = 11) and IV (n = 17). Subjects underwent a 50-minute MR
imaging protocol at 3T (Signa HDxt; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin)
comprising of pre- and post-CE T1-weighted MR, DTI, CE perfusion measurement
(DCE-MRI), T2-weighted MR imaging, and whole-brain MRSI. Details of subject
selection and imaging methods are previously reported [1, 2]. Maps were generated
by digital subtraction of non-enhanced T1-weighted images from Contrast
Enhanced (CE) T1-weighted images (ΔT1 map) and non-enhanced T1-weighted images
from T2-weighted images (ΔT2 map). Prior to subtraction images were Gaussian
normalized (GN) and spatially registered.
Figure 1 shows
subtraction images for a subject with a grade IV glioma. Manually drawn regions
of interest (ROI) were positioned in (1) NAWM in the contralateral hemisphere
to the gross tumor, (2) enhancing tumor region (ER) as seen on CE T1-weighted
imaging, (3) hyperintense regions (HR) on T2 images located in the gross tumor
volume but not in the enhancing or necrotic regions, (4) necrotic region (NR),
(5) immediate peritumoral region (IPR) defined as a 1 cm wide band around the
enhancing region, and (6) distal peritumoral region (DPR) defined as a band
approximately 2 -3 cm away from the enhancing region. ROIs drawn on CE
T1-weighted images and T2-weighted images were transferred to DTI maps (ADC,
FA), PWI CBV map, MRSI maps (Cho/Cr, NAA/Cr) and generated subtraction maps,
which were all registered to the pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging using the
MIDAS software (http://mrir.med.miami.edu)
[3, 4]. Mean
intensity for each MR map within study ROIs was calculated. Relative signal
contrast (RSC) was estimated as the difference in the mean intensities between
the ROI under consideration and contralateral NAWM. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was
used to estimate if mean calculated RSC for a particular tissue type was
significantly different across image types with post-hoc analysis carried out
with Tukey's test for pair-wise comparisons.
Results
In Figure 2 is
shown the mean RSC for all image series and for each of the six contrasts,
accounting for tumor grade. ΔT1 maps offer significantly higher contrast as
compared to other parametric maps in differentiating the ER from contralateral
NAWM (p < 0.001). Tukey's pair-wise comparisons demonstrated that CBV,
Cho/Cr and ΔT2 maps all provided equal contrast for differentiating ER from
NAWM (p > 0.05). In differentiating edematous regions from NAWM it was found
that ΔT2 maps offer the highest contrast (p < 0.001) with significantly
higher contrasts in high grade tumors as compared to low grade tumor. Although
subtraction maps using T2-weighted (ΔT2) and T1-weighted (ΔT1) do offer the
highest contrast in distinguishing IPR and DPR from NAWM, respectively, they
fail to reach a significance level of 0.05 on ANOVA analysis. For Grade II and
Grade III tumors, ΔT2 maps provided the highest contrast in differentiating IPR
from NAWM, however, for grade IV tumors CBV maps provided the highest optical
contrast among all imaging modalities. In discriminating between ER and Edema
ΔT1 maps provide excellent contrast as compared to other parametric maps (p
< 0.001). Moreover, it is seen that in contrasts involving ER (ER versus
NAWM and ER versus Edema) CBV maps provide the second highest mean RSC among
the different parametric maps, only second to ΔT1.
Conclusion
The main
finding of this study was that subtraction maps generated using a combination
of pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging provided
better contrast in identifying various regions of the gross tumor area than
other parametric images/maps generated using DTI, PWI or MRSI.
Acknowledgements
NIH R01CA172210References
[1] Maudsley AA, et al. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014;35:S31-36
[2]
Roy B, et al. Neuroradiology
2013;55:603-613
[3]
Maudsley AA, et al. NMR in Biomedicine
2006;19:492-503
[4] Maudsley AA, et al. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009;61:548-559