Synopsis
Image-based model generation methods demonstrate the value
of creating realistic human head models based on high-resolution MRI data. Head
models created by the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory and Simpleware (Exeter,
UK) are being used to study head impact and traumatic brain injury; this offers
a solution to the problem of limited experimental testing. Results from the modelling
methodology and simulation demonstrate a good level of accuracy when compared
to experimental benchmarks. The methodology and models have been extended for
use in areas such as examining head impact in sports including American
football, rugby and cricket.PURPOSE
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious condition
affecting multiple groups, from soldiers to athletes engaged in activities
involving blunt force to the skull. Long-term neurological and other motor
disorders are present in between 14% and 20% of veterans of the Iraq and
Afghanistan wars
,1 while TBIs have been widely reported in relation
to sports injuries. Although significant research has been carried out into the
mechanisms of TBI, this has been limited by cadaver and other experimental
samples. Numerical modelling using computational models from MRI data offers
potential for flexible yet robust research into TBI and other forms of head
impact.
METHODS
Solutions to the challenge of creating computational models of the human
head from scans have typically involved producing computer-aided design (CAD)
models, with an idealised geometry used to produce a numerical model, or mesh,
suitable for finite element analysis of impact. CAD methods, however, produce
issues with complex anatomies and internal structures, leading to a large
amount of manual fixing. The majority of models are also designed for specific
applications.
For example, a head model has been created from 14
cross-sectional MRI slices and processed using C++ code before being converted
into CAD coordinates and spline data,2 while models have been
produced by automotive companies to handle particular inputs like crash impact.3
These models have the limitation of being ‘fixed’ for their applications and
not easily adapted for new inputs. The NRL-Simpleware model produced from MRI
data is designed to solve this flexibility issue by creating finite element meshes
from pre-segmented image data, rather than working with pre-defined meshes.
The model was developed by acquiring a whole head in vivo
MRI scan of a 25-year old male volunteer at the Exeter MR Centre, UK. The
T1-weighted scan produced coronal plane image slices with a resolution of
1.03516 mm x 1.03516 mm, with a slice-to-slice separation of 1.4001 mm. The
DICOM image series was imported from the MRI scanner to Simpleware ScanIP
software for image processing (Fig 1).
Regions
of interest (ROIs) within the greyscale data were segmented and labelled,
including brain, skull and muscles. A range of image processing tools were used
to fully reconstruct the geometry of the head, skull and neck. Parts not
available from the scan, such as facial and neck muscles, were imported into
the software for conversion to image masks. This method also allows new
objects, such as helmets, to be incorporated within the segmented anatomical data
(Fig 2).
Multi-part meshes were generated from the segmented data,
with options available for automatically converting ROIs into volumetric FE models
using a multi-part Extended Volumetric Marching Cubes (EVOMAC) approach, and
for multi-part surface decimation technique that allows control over the size
of the model.4 The particular NRL-Simpleware model used for simulation
of TBI was produced as an unstructured, all-tetrahedral mesh with 3.72 M
volumetric elements.
The NRL-Simpleware model was set up for specific blunt impact
(low-to-mid rate) and blast overpressure (mid-to-high rate) simulations in FE
solver Abaqus/Explicit. Blunt impact simulations were validated against
experimental data in the literature5 and blast overpressure simulations
conducted using established thresholds.6, 7
RESULTS
The blunt impact study involved post-processing of the
simulation data to quantify injured brain volume as a function of event time
based on injury threshold measures in the literature.
8 Python
scripting was used to calculate evolution of these volumes based on a pressure threshold
of 173 kPa
9 and a shear strain threshold of 5%,
7 with good
agreement found with the literature. For blast overpressure loading, a frontal
loading with a Friedlander wave profile
10 was used with a peak
pressure of approximately 430 kPa (Fig 4).
DISCUSSION
Blunt impact loading simulations using the NRL-Simpleware model that were validated
against experimental data showed excellent agreement with benchmark results.
Blast overpressure results, designed to reproduce conditions associated with
military and explosive weaponry, also demonstrated good results for predicting
brain injury as a function of both location and time.
CONCLUSION
The NRL-Simpleware model demonstrates promise for both
military and clinical research into TBI and other forms of head impact. The
novel ability to easily generate new finite element meshes from the segmented
image data means that the model can be tailored for specific applications,
including electromagnetic simulation. Moreover, the head model is being used in
sports research, for example in American football and for studying the effect
of cricket ball impact, and is generating promising insights into the mechanics
of head injuries and other scenarios that can be modelled from MRI and other image data.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) through the US Naval Research Laboratory's Basic Research Program, and the Department of Defense (DoD) High Performance Computing Modernization Program (HPCMP) using the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Major Shared Resource Center (MSRC) under project 416, subproject 231.References
1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Traumatic brain injury: a guide for patients. http://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs.tbi.pdf. Accessed November 10, 2015.
2. Mehta, BV, Rajani, S. Sinha, G. Comparison of image processing techniques (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scan and ultrasound) for 3D modeling and analysis of the human bones. J. Digit. Imaging. 1997; 10: 203-206.
3. Takhounts, EG, Ridella, V, Hasija, RE, Tannous, JQ, et al. Investigation of traumatic brain injuries using the next generation of simulated injury monitor (SIMon) finite element head model. Stapp Car Crash J. 2008; 52:1-31.
4. Young, PG, Beresford-West, TBH, Coward, SRL, et al. An efficient approach to converting three-dimensional image data into highly accurate computational models. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008; 366:3155-3173.
5. Nahum AM, Smith, R, Ward, CC. Intracranial pressure dynamics during head impact. Proc. Of the 21st Stapp Car Crash Conf. 1977: 339-366.
6. Kang, HSR, Willinger, R, Diaw, N et al. Validation of a 3D anatomic head model and replication of head impact in motorcycle accident by finite element modeling. SAE Trans. 1997; 106(6):3849-3858.
7. Margulies, SS, Thibault, LE. A proposed tolerance criterion for diffuse axonal injury in man. J Biomech. 1992; 25(8):917-923.
8. Besenski, N. Traumatic injuries: imaging of head injuries. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12(6):1237-1252.
9. Zhang, L., Yang, KH, King, AL. A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. J Biomech Eng. 2004: 126(2):226-236.
10. Dewey, JM. The shape of the blast wave: studies of the Friedlander equation. 21st international symposium on military aspects of blast and shock. 2010.