Synopsis
We propose a generalized Shinnar-Le-Roux transform that maps T1, T2 and frequency selective pulses to multi-dimensional polynomials. We show that the polynomial mapping is one-to-one and hence designing these RF pulses reduces to multi-dimensional polynomial design. We describe a convex approach to the multi-dimensional polynomial design and show preliminary T2 and frequency selective pulses.Purpose
To extend the Shinnar-Le-Roux (SLR) algorithm for designing joint
T1,
T2, and frequency selective RF pulses.
Introduction
Designing radio frequency pulses is in general a non-linear problem. The SLR transform
1,2 introduces a one-to-one mapping between frequency selective pulses to polynomials and hence allows us to design frequency selective pulses using linear filter design tools. Recently, Logi et al.
3 further extends the SLR transform to
T2 selective pulses. In this work, we propose a generalization of the SLR transform and map a joint
T1,
T2 and frequency selective pulse to multi-dimensional polynomials. This enables us to create
T1,
T2 and frequency selective pulses using convex optimization filter design tools.
RF pulses to polynomials
For illustration, we focus on the case where T1 can be neglected. Derivation with T1 is shown in figures.
To account for T1 and T2, we consider the standard representation of magnetization (Mxy,Mz) instead of spinors. We assume the hard pulse model (Figure 1), where the RF pulse is parametrized by hard pulse flip angle magnitude θn and phase ϕn with spacing Δt for free precession, T2 decay, and T1 recovery. We define z2 to be exp(Δt/T2+i2πfΔt). Then, expanding the forward equation in Figure 1 recursively, we can express the magnetization after the nth hard pulse as:
Mxy,n(z2,z∗2)=∑i+j≤nbn[i][j] z−i2z∗2−jMz,n(z2,z∗2)=∑i+j≤nan[i][j] z−i2z∗2−j Moreover, these polynomials satisfy constraints that are invariant to the RF pulse: Since Mz,n is real, an[i][j]=a∗n[j][i]. The polynomials can also be verified to satisfy:
ℜ[Mxy,n(z2,z∗2)M∗xy,n(1/z∗2,1/z2)]+Mz,n(z2,z∗2)Mz,n(1/z∗2,1/z2)=1
which reduces to the original SLR energy conservation constraint (|Mxy,n|2+|Mz,n|2=1) when T2 is neglected.
Polynomials to RF pulses
More importantly, any pair of two-dimensional polynomials that satisfies the invariant constraints can be mapped back to a T2 and frequency selective pulse. In particular, if we go though the inverse equation in Figure 2, each polynomial must reduce its degree by one. By matching with the invariant constraints, one unique hard pulse angle can be found to reduce the polynomial degrees: (θnϕn)=(tan−1(|bn[0][0]|an[0][0])∠(−ibn[0][0]an[0][0]))=(tan−1(|2an[0][n]||bn[n][0]|−|bn[0][n]|)∠(ian[0][n]bn[n][0]))
Because of limited space, we omit the detailed derivation. By iterating through the inverse equations, we can show that there is a one-to-one mapping between a T2 and frequency selective pulse and a pair of two-dimensional polynomials. A similar procedure can show that a T1, T2 and frequency selective pulse can be mapped one-to-one to three-dimensional polynomials, which are summarized in Figure 3.
Polynomial design via Convex Relaxation
We have now reduced the general pulse design to multi-dimensional polynomial design. However, one challenge is that multi-dimensional minimum phase decomposition does not exist and the invariant constraint becomes difficult to incorporate within the filter design. In this abstract, we consider a convex relaxation approach4,5 as shown in Figure 4. However, more work is still needed to consistently design multi-dimensional polynomials.
Small tip angle region
We also consider the small-tip angle region, where
sin2(θn/2)≈0. By propagating through the forward equation, the polynomial coefficients can be found to be mostly zeros, except
bn[i][0],
an[i][0] and
an[0][j]. Hence, the two-dimensional polynomials can be approximated as one-dimensional polynomials and the small-tip
T2 and frequency polynomial can be easily designed using the z-transform as shown in the results.
Results
Because of the complexity of designing multi-dimensional polynomials, we have only implemented our method successfully with small-tip T2 and frequency pulses, where the design reduces to a one-dimensional z-transform. Figure 2a shows minimum phase TBW=6 pulses designed to excite a bandwidth of 600 Hz for T2 = 10000 ms and T2 = 1ms separately, with Δt=50μs and n=20. Note that the z-transform of the short T2 pulse shows how the polynomial compensates for the short T2 by shifting the zeros to the left, which results in a sharp frequency selective profile. Figure 2b shows a minimum phase pulse designed to null T2=1ms with frequency =0Hz and =−100Hz, using the proposed method with ΔT=250μs and n=20. Note that the z-transform of the polynomial shows that the zeros are placed exactly at the corresponding z2 null points.
Acknowledgements
We thank the following funding sources: NIH Grants R01EB009690, Sloan Research Fellowship, Okawa Research Grant and the NSF graduate fellowshipReferences
[1] M. Shinnar, S. Eleff, H. Subramanian, and J. S. Leigh, “The synthesis of pulse sequences yielding arbitrary
magnetization vectors.” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 74–80, Oct. 1989. [Online]. Available:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mrm.1910120109/abstract
[2] J. Pauly, P. Le Roux, D. Nishimura, and A. Macovski, “Parameter relations for the Shinnar-Le Roux selective excitation
pulse design algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 1991. [Online]. Available:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=75611
[3] L. Vidarsson, C. Cunningham, G. E. Gold, and J. M. Pauly, “T2-Selective Magnetization Preparation Pulses,”
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 981–989, Jul. 2007. [Online]. Available: http:
//ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4265756
[4] B. Dumitrescu, “Positive trigonometric polynomials and signal processing applications,” 2007. [Online]. Available:
https://books.google.com/books?id=9gLXILJUm4QC
[5] E. J. Candes, Y. C. Eldar, T. Strohmer, and V. Voroninski, “Phase Retrieval via Matrix Completion,” SIAM Journal on Imaging
Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 199–225, Feb. 2013. [Online]. Available: http://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/110848074