Shufang Liu1,2,3, Lin Zhang3,4, Pauline Ferry3,4, Andrei Codreanu5, Anne Menini2, and Freddy Odille3,4
1Institut für Informatik, Technology University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 2GE Global Research, Munich, Germany, 3Imagerie Adaptative Diagnostique et Interventionnelle, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France, 4U947, INSERM, Nancy, France, 5Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Synopsis
This work present a robust motion correction framework for T1 mapping and ECV mapping. Motion correction within one series and between different series are discussed. Validation is performed on 2 patient data and 6 volunteer data.Background
Extracellular volume (ECV) can provide a quantitative assessment
of the myocardial fibrosis. To obtain the ECV map, T1 weighted series before
and after contrast agent injection need to be acquired and pixel-wise curve fitting
is used to get the T1 maps. Despite the patients are instructed to hold their
breath, motion can still be observed both within one T1 series (termed
intra-series motion) and between the pre- and post- contrast series (termed
inter-series motion). Nonrigid image registration
can be used to correct the inter-image motion [1,2]. Despite these advances, robust
registration in both inversion recovery (IR) and saturation recovery (SR)
techniques remains challenging due to the drastic contrast changes and due to
the large motion between pre- and post- contrast images (typically acquired at
10-15 min interval). In this work we propose a post-processing framework with
minimum user input for robust correction of both intra- and inter-series motion,
based on non-rigid registration. Improved robustness is obtained by a preprocessing
the images to minimize contrast changes and landmark tracking is used in order
to deal with large deformations.
Methods
Intra-series correction: First
images are preprocessing including a) removing
large contrast changes by subtraction of a low frequency version of the images,
b) histogram matching. And then the sum-of-squared-differences (SSD) metric is minimized
to extract the motion field [3]. Additionally, a predictive motion model is
investigated to further improve the registration results. In this method, a
region of interest (ROI) containing the heart is detected by thresholding a
reduced resolution T1 map from the raw data. Registration in this ROI is likely
to fail in frames near the nulling point of the IR or SR curve. Motion inside
this ROI is assumed to be correlated with motion outside the ROI. A statistical
model is therefore constructed by partial least-squares regression (PLSR), using
frames far away from the nulling point (training frames). Then in the other
frames (prediction frames), motion inside the ROI is predicted from the outer
region using the learnt statistical model (Figure 1).
Inter-series
correction: To correct the inter-series motion, several landmarks
are picked on the pre-contrast images by the user. The corresponding points on
the post-contrast images are detected automatically by block matching methods.
Then the global non-rigid motion is estimated by interpolating the motion from
the landmarks. Finally the motion is
refined using non-rigid registration.
MRI data: Preliminary
results from 2 patients and 6 volunteers with both pre- and post- contrast
images (GE 3T MR scanners) are processed. For each volunteer, both IR (MOLLI)
and SR (SMART1map) single-shot sequences are acquired during repeated
breath-holds. Images before motion correction were manually segmented by a
cardiologist. DICE overlap measures [2] and Myocardial Boundary Error (MBE) in
pixel units were computed to quantify the improvement after motion correction.
Result
Figure 2 shows
the DICE score and MBE of each series before and after the intra-series registration
step. When the prediction step was turned off, the average DICE score was
improved from 0.969±0.014 to 0.974±0.009 (p = 0.0694), and the MBE decreased
from 0.917±0.372 to 0.746±0.233 (p = 0.0133) for overall series. Results were
similar with the predictive model on, with DICE scores of 0.975±0.008 and MBE
of 0.741±0.219. However the differences between results obtained with and
without the predictive motion model were not statistically significant. Figure 3
illustrate the registration result between pre- and post- contrast images of a
patient with anteroseptal infarction by computing the ECV map. Before registration,
the ECV map is corrupted by the inter-series motion, after motion registration,
the infarction area can be clearly observed. Figure 3c gives a quantitative
measurement of the DICE coefficient for the inter-series registration from all
the datasets including SMART1map and MOLLI from both patients and volunteers,
the DICE score increased from 0.88±0.09 to 0.96±0.02 (p=0.001).
Conclusion
The proposed post-processing framework can be used to
calculate ECV maps in T1 mapping clinical studies based on either IR or SR
techniques. More patient datasets will be necessary in order to conclude
whether the predictive model can bring a significant improvement to the
software. In future work we will investigate an automatic selection of the
landmarks.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]
Xue, 2014,MRM; [2] Roujol, 2015, MRM; [3] Odille, 2014, JMRI