Daniel Christopher Hoinkiss1, Matthias Guenther1, and David Andrew Porter1
1MR Physics, Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany
Synopsis
Diffusion Tensor
Imaging is frequently affected by long-term subject motion. Intermediate pseudo-trace-weighted
images enable a real-time image registration with low sensitivity
to contrast variation between diffusion-weighted images. These registration results are used to correct the imaging
parameters of the ongoing scan. The algorithm was evaluated on three individual
subjects using a dedicated diffusion-weighted imaging sequence. The prospective
motion correction was able to reduce the typical long-term motion to a band of approximately ±0.2mm for translational and ±0.2° for rotational motion, which is far below
voxel size, without increasing the total scan time or changing the set of
diffusion vectors.Purpose
Long-term subject motion is a major challenge for Diffusion Tensor Imaging
(DTI). It is common practice to perform a retrospective motion correction, but
overall results are likely to improve using a prospective motion correction to
minimize the motion to be corrected by post processing. Registration-based
prospective motion correction is well established in BOLD imaging
1, but application to diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging
2 is problematic due to large contrast variation between images. Previous
work
3,4 proposed intermediate, pseudo-trace-weighted (psTW)
images for fast, real-time image registration with low sensitivity to the
contrast variation; this approach was shown to provide reliable motion
estimates for b-values up to 3000s/mm
2. This abstract describes,
for the first time, the use of these intermediate, psTW images to perform
prospective motion correction in DW imaging.
Subjects and Methods
Before scanning, the diffusion-gradient directions are reordered to
provide a new acquisition scheme in which each set of three consecutive
directions are highly mutually orthogonal. During the scan, a psTW image is
calculated from the current and the two preceding DW images by taking their
geometric mean. The psTW images are used as input for a rigid-body motion
detection related to the first psTW image using a least-squares cost-function.
This results in rapidly calculated motion estimates without the influence of contrast
variation between DW images.
The calculated results are then fed back to the sequence and used to
adapt the slice position and orientation during the ongoing scan (Fig. 1). In
this procedure, the motion estimates are used to derive a linear
transformation, related to the average slice position and orientation5
of the three images used to calculate the psTW image.
This includes a quaternion multiplication to acquire the new orientation and a
linear shift, weighted with the measured rotation, to get the new position. To maintain a consistent relationship between imaging and
diffusion gradients, the diffusion-gradient direction is also adapted to fit
the new imaging plane.
The method was evaluated using a dedicated DW imaging sequence with 64
diffusion-gradient directions at 3T (Skyra, Siemens Healthcare). A b-value of
b=1000s/mm2 and GRAPPA factor of 2 were used (TE=86.47ms/TR=5524.80ms)
at 48 slices with 2mm isotropic voxel size. No correction was applied for
frequency drift during the scan. As gold standard reference, b=0s/mm2
images were interleaved between the DW images to estimate the true subject motion;
these were not used by the prospective motion correction. Three individual
subjects were scanned; all with and without enabled motion correction. There
was no head restraint or intentional head movement.
Results
Figure 2 demonstrates the reduction of contrast
variation by calculating psTW images (right) from the acquired DW image volumes
(left).
Figure 3 shows the estimated motion parameters
from the interleaved b=0s/mm2 images with and without the prospective
motion correction based on psTW images. The motion correction was able to reduce the motion to a band of approximately ±0.2mm/±0.2°. In contrast, the graphs
without motion correction show the typical long-term motion of the subject.
During the scans, there was a significant frequency drift, leading to a
corresponding image shift in the phase-encoding direction without motion correction
(Fig. 2a/d/g). This component of apparent motion was also removed when scanning
with the prospective correction procedure. However, the graphs also demonstrate
a low-level fluctuation in motion parameters, which is not evident in the
uncorrected data; particularly noticeable in the rotation parameter plots of figures
2c and 2e.
The related trace-weighted images and color FA
maps (Fig. 4, proband two) indicate an improvement of overall image quality due
to the enabled prospective motion correction.
Discussion
The fluctuations in the rotational motion
parameters are not fully understood. The motion detection estimates of previous
work showed smoother curves using the psTW images, which implies a systematic
error in the correction of the imaging slices.
The temporal resolution of the motion
correction was lowered by the interleaved b=0s/mm2 images, which
were used as gold standard reference. Without these, the temporal resolution of
the method is only affected by the moving window of three averaged DW images.
The update rate is the same as the temporal resolution of the measurement.
Conclusion
The motion detection using intermediate,
pseudo-trace-weighted images was successfully transferred to a prospective
motion correction using the motion parameters to correct slice position and
orientation of ongoing scans. The long-term subject motion was reduced to a
band of approximately ±0.2mm for translations and ±0.2° for rotations, shown by the gold
standard reference, without the need of increasing the total scan time or
changing the set of diffusion-gradient directions. The method increases the
image quality of calculated parameter maps and fiber-tracking analyses.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1: Thesen et al., MRM 2000;44:457
2: Benner et al., MRM 2011;66:154
3: Porter and Huwer, ISMRM 2014;22:1603
4: Hoinkiss and Porter, ESMRMB 2015;28:322
5: Gramkow, IJCV 2001;42:7