Tom Hilbert1,2,3, Tobias Kober1,2,3, Jean-Philippe Thiran2,3, Reto Meuli2, and Gunnar Krueger2,3,4
1Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology (HC CMEA SUI DI BM PI), Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2Department of Radiology, University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland, 3LTS5, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Phase-encode ghosting artifacts frequently occur
in magnetic resonance imaging, especially in spin-echo sequence derivatives
such as fluid-attenuated inversion recovery. The appearance of these artifacts may
cause misinterpretation as tissue pathology, e.g. a lesion. We propose an
algorithm to automatically detect these artifacts by analyzing the consistency
of the acquired k-space with respect to the assumption of GRAPPA that a k-space
sample is a linear sum of its neighboring samples. The performance of the
technique is shown in three volunteers. It may help to avoid potential
misinterpretation in the future, both for radiological readers and automated
post-processing algorithms.Introduction
A typical artifact in magnetic resonance imaging with Cartesian sampling
is phase-encode (PE) ghosting. It is a result of spins moving between phase encoding
and data sampling in an MR acquisition. This k-space inconsistency manifests as
ghosting along the PE direction and bears the risk to be misinterpreted as a disease-induced
tissue alteration. This detrimental effect is of particular importance in both Fluid
Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) and Rapid Acquisition with
Relaxation Enhancement (RARE)-type
imaging since these sequences are often employed to identify small pathological
foci, e.g. multiple-sclerosis lesions. In brain images, the artefacts often appear
at the posterior fossa and may significantly aggravate after a gadolinium
injection due to the amplified blood signal
1.
We suggest a method to automatically detect PE ghosting in order to prevent
potential misinterpretation of these artefacts by a reader as well as to
provide additional information to image post-processing algorithms applied on these
images.
Materials & Methods
After obtaining written consent from three healthy volunteers, a fully
sampled product 2D FLAIR sequence (TR/TI/TE 10s/2.6s/9.3ms, resolution
0.7x0.7x3mm3, number of slices 43, slice gap 0.3mm) was acquired at 3T (MAGNETOM Skyra,
Siemens Healthcare, Germany) using a commercially available 20-channel head/neck
coil. Using the k-space raw data of this scan, Generalized Autocalibrating
Partially Parallel Acquisition (GRAPPA)
2 kernels where trained on
the k-space center and subsequently used to calculate every k-space sample
based on the weighted sum of its neighbors to generate a second k-space dataset.
Afterwards, the original and GRAPPA-reconstructed k-space sets were subtracted,
inverse Fourier-transformed and coil-combined using sum of squares. This yielded
an image (“artifact map”) containing only signal energy that violated the
GRAPPA assumption, i.e. that a k-space sample is a linear combination of its
neighboring samples. Among others, noise and PE ghosting do not correspond to
this assumption and thus appear in this artifact map. In order to separate PE ghosting
from noise, every outlier in the artifact map (defined as voxels >2*standard
deviation of the artifact map), was labeled in a binary mask. Finally, the
severity of PE ghosting per PE column was quantified by counting the number of
outliers in this column
3. Finally, the columns with detected PE
ghosting were marked in the original image according to the suspected artifact
severity (see Fig. 2). A flowchart of this algorithm is illustrated in Fig. 1.
Results & Discussions
A slice of the posterior fossa is shown in Fig. 2. Zooming into the cerebellum reveals a
ghosting artifact caused by blood flow pulsation of the posterior inferior cerebellar
artery, which may be misinterpreted as an MS lesion. The algorithm successfully
detected these image columns as affected by PE ghosting, which is indicated by
the red severity-scaled overlay bars. Additional artifacts at the brainstem
caused by the vertebral arteries were as well detected.
In current clinical routine, the acquisition of FLAIR images is usually
accelerated using parallel imaging techniques. In that case, the k-space does
not meet the requirement of being fully sampled anymore. However, the PE-ghosting
detection could be applied after a standard GRAPPA reconstruction. Simulations
indicate, however, that the sensitivity of the algorithm will be reduced
because the ghosting will be more spread in the artifact map and may not exceed
the outlier cut-off level.
Conclusion
The presented technique uses GRAPPA to create a duplicate of an acquired
k-space. The original and the duplicate image differ where the assumption that
the k-space data point is a linear combination of its neighbors is
violated. Obtained difference maps
reveal corresponding artifacts, e.g. spatial locations where PE ghosting
artifacts occur and may provide an indication about their expected severity.
This may help to avoid misinterpretation of artifacts as disease effects by
providing additional information to the radiological reader or to automated
post-processing algorithms such as morphometric analysis or lesion detection
techniques.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1Vrenken, H., et
al. "Recommendations to improve imaging and analysis of brain lesion load
and atrophy in longitudinal studies of multiple sclerosis." Journal of
neurology 260.10 (2013): 2458-2471.
2Griswold, Mark
A., et al. "Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions
(GRAPPA)." Magnetic resonance in medicine 47.6 (2002): 1202-1210.
3Mortamet, Bénédicte, et al. "Automatic
quality assessment in structural brain magnetic resonance imaging."
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 62.2 (2009): 365-372.