Ludovic de Rochefort1, Geneviève Guillot1, Rose-Marie Dubuisson1, and Romain Valabrègue2
1Imagerie par résonance magnétique médicale et multi-modalités, IR4M, UMR 8081, CNRS-Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France, 2CENIR, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06 UMR S 1127F, Paris, France
Synopsis
Fast steady-state
sequences combine RF and gradient spoiling to modulate contrasts in MRI. The steady-state
depends on many physical and acquisition parameters. Here, in vivo feasibility on
brain is shown to map proton density, background phase, flip angle, relaxation
rates and apparent diffusion coefficient from such sequences. Multiple volumes were
acquired with various optimized prescribed flip angle, spoiling gradients and
phase increments, and the complex signal was fitted to the Bloch-Torrey signal model
with free diffusion using efficient calculation algorithms. The acquisition of
full 3D co-localized multi-parametric maps of relevant MR physical parameters
in a realistic scan time is demonstrated.Purpose
Fast sequences
involving repeated RF pulses sensitize signal to a variety of MR parameters [1].
Various parametric mapping approaches based on fitting signals acquired with
different RF cycling, spoiling gradients or flip angles have been proposed for
e.g. flip angle, T1 and/or T2 mapping [1-5]. Here, a refined modelling of the
Bloch-Torrey equation with free diffusion was used to enable 3D co-localized
mapping of proton density, background phase, flip angle, relaxation rates and apparent
diffusion coefficients based on fast low angle sequences. Optimization
approaches based on the Fisher information matrix were applied to define
acquisition parameters minimizing the error on the expected parameters in a
realistic scan time feasible in vivo.
Methods
Forward model and signal
fitting: To model the Bloch-Torrey equation in such RF and gradient spoiled
sequences, the configuration state formalism [6] was used. This formalism
enables to handle free diffusion as a repetitive Gaussian filtering [7] and a fast
calculation of the steady-state can be derived [8]. Based on several
acquisitions with different acquisition parameters, the measured complex signal
was fitted using least-squares and the Fisher information matrix provided the
expected variance on the 6 fitted parameters: proton density, background phase
at TE, flip angle, relaxation rates and apparent diffusion coefficient.
Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to demonstrate the ability to fit
unbiased parameters and fully predict noise propagation.
Experiments: Imaging was
performed at 1.5 T using an 8-channel head coil for reception on a healthy
volunteer. A 3D gradient echo sequence was modified to allow sequential
acquisition of volumes with different flip angles, RF phase increments and
spoiling gradients. The spoiling gradient was restricted to the readout
direction and was characterized by the effective dephasing distance applied
during each TR, a, which was varied
from volume to volume. Fixed scan parameters were: TE=3 ms, acquisition matrix
160x120x20 and voxel size 1.25 mm x1.25 mm x5 mm, reconstructed
voxel size 0.7 mm x0.7 mm x2.5mm, bandwidth 293 Hz/pix, Tacq =30 s per volume, acquisition
of the k=0 state. To demonstrate the ability
to fit all parameters with fixed TR (12 ms), prescribed flip angle amplitude
(25°) and spoiling gradients (a=312 µm),
series 1 was acquired with 28 phase increments (0°/1°/-1°/2°/-2°/4°/-4°/8°/-8°/16°/-16°/180°/90°/-90°/45°/-45°/0°/117°/-117°/150°/-150°/32°/-32°/64°/-64°/128°/-128°/0°) leading to a
total scan time of 14 min. To demonstrate the ability to control and enhance the
precision on the fitted parameters, series 2 was acquired with 13 volumes in
6.5 min with TR=12.5 ms, flip angles (26°/18°/26°/33°/14°/9°/6°/50°/22°/16°/17°/2°/26°),
a (312, 125, 312, 312, 312, 179, 312,
312, 125, 140, 125, 312, 312 µm) and phase increments (0°/-2°/3°/180°/-1°/-1°/180°/0°/-3°/2°/2°/177°/0°).
The acquisition parameters were obtained by minimizing the sum of the relative
errors provided by the inverse of the Fisher information matrix for a range of
expected relaxation and diffusion parameters. The minimization was performed
with a stochastic optimization algorithm [9], and with predefined bounds on
maximum flip angle and a, and a fixed
TR.
Results
Table 1 and 2 provides
the results of a Monte-Carlo simulation considering realistic physical
parameters. The average fitted values are unbiased, the simulated standard
deviation on the parameters corresponded to the theoretical one (square root of
the diagonal elements of the inverse Fisher information matrix) indicating that
the precision can be predicted theoretically, and that optimization approaches
can be used to define acquisition parameters providing preselected precision on
the fitted parameters.
Both protocols were
able to recover parametric maps (reconstruction time ~min/slice). Exemplary in vivo images obtained using series 2
are shown in Fig.1. As can be seen, the signal is modulated in a complex way
mixing all contrasts. The reconstructed parametric maps are displayed in Fig. 2
demonstrating the feasibility to map in
vivo all 6 parameters with tractable precision.
Discussion/Conclusion
Co-localized multi-parametric
mapping using fast low flip angle sequences with various flip angle amplitudes,
phase cycling and gradient spoiling is feasible in vivo. Proton density, background phase, effective flip angle, apparent
diffusion coefficient and relaxation parameters can be measured accurately and
precisely. Error propagation can be analyzed to estimate the fitted parameter precision,
and to optimize the acquisition protocol for a realistic scan time in vivo with targeted precision on
preselected parameters. This work generalizes previous parametric mapping
approaches, notably including free diffusion and the effective flip angle, and
could be further extended to take into account partial voxel, exchange or magnetization
transfer, and restricted diffusion to further provide the ability to map the
associated parameters using fast low angle sequences.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Zur
et al. MRM 1991-21:251. 2. Fram et
al., MRI 1987-5:201. 3. Heule et
al., MRM 2013-71:1137. 4. Ganter et
al., MRM 2009-62:149. 5. Deoni et
al., MRM 2011-65:1021. 6. Weigel, JMRI
2015-41-266. 7. Kaiser et al. The
journal of Chemical Physics 1974-60:2966. 8.
de Rochefort, ISMRM 2015. 9. Zelinka
I. SOMA—Self organizing migrating algorithm. In Babu BV and Onwubolu G,
editors, New optimization techniques in engineering. Springer, 2004.